View Full Version : Ward Saves vs Regen. Clearing things up

26-08-2010, 06:25
Now, I have NO idea why I think this, but is there a difference between ward saves and regen saves?

Let's take a cannon, for example. It hits a character with a 4+ ward save. They take a ward save, fail and then take d6 wounds. However, I have it in my head that with regen you get hit, roll d6 wounds and regen each of those wounds individually.

Anyone clear this up or is regen just a crappier version of ward save?

26-08-2010, 06:34
just a crappier ward save.

26-08-2010, 06:38
Just to clarify Casshole's answer.

If you are hit with a cannonball and have a 4+ ward you would roll a die on a 1-3 you would take d6 wounds. A 4-6 means you are fine.

Same with regen.(assuming normal regen.)

The only thing "crappier" about regen is the ability of "flaming" attacks to negate your regeneration.

26-08-2010, 06:43
And KB still?

26-08-2010, 07:23
And KB still?

Yes indeed thank you sir

26-08-2010, 08:09
Ward Saves stacks with Magic resistance aswell, in addition to working vs fire. 6+ ward save and magic resistance 1 = 5+ ward save vs magic. 6+ regen and magic resistance 1 = 6+ ward save OR 6+ Regen.

Uhm, Killing Blow negates Regen aswell? Didnt know that.

26-08-2010, 08:34
Yeah, so regen isn't actually that good then compared to a ward save. Guess it was actually pretty clear to begin with./

26-08-2010, 08:47
Regeneration + the Dragonhelm/Dragonbane Gem is a good combo. Only downside is the KB vulnerability.

26-08-2010, 08:47
Ward Saves suffer against the Other Trickster's Shard. Regeneration's more reliable there.

26-08-2010, 09:46
Never thought of that.

28-08-2010, 04:39
Also consider the Goblin Tricksy Trinket. Regeneration will provide a save while ward saves will not. There's also a lizardman sword that negates wards, but regeneration is not actually a ward.