View Full Version : just a random thought on marks of chaos

27-04-2013, 03:56
Just want to share a thought... since GW is sharing a lot of rules on chaos (warriors/marines, that is) between 40k and FB, which is good, why not sharing marks of chaos? I personally think that 40k marks are so much better... tzeentch is pratically the same (ward/inv.save, althought they should get some bonus on psykic powers in 40k as they have on spells in FB), but why not the Nurgle T bonus and the Slaanesh I bonus? Khorne... frenzy, ok, that makes sense.


Gorbad Ironclaw
27-04-2013, 04:57
Tzeentch have always been the mark that changed the most (I don't think they really know what to do with it, in both WFB and 40K), I seem to remember it being a reroll power back about 4th/5th and I liked that better. The other three have from memory been a lot more settled and not changed much at all. But anyway I don't see any particular reason for why they should be the same. If you got a rule that works well within the confines of their ruleset, what is gained by making it identical to a rule in a rather different ruleset?