
Originally Posted by
GreySeerZ
I love how everyone thinks in absolutes and avoids the actual tactics of the game, though I do understand theorycrafting is all hypothetical. Armies (with several small exceptions) will most likely have 1 character with KB and 1 unit that have KB weapons. Your assuming that every game my opponent can and would take that unit/character and b-line it for my lord, make it to him, and kill him. You are also assuming that I, during setup, would place my character in a position opposite a unit I know has killing blow, or across from the opposing lord or special character that I know has KB... If he is dumb enough to make his focus killing my lord, he has lost. If I am dumb enough to set my lord up to die, I'm an idiot.
I have an entire army of deadly units/characters moving across the board. While he is focusing on repositioning his units to get KB in base contact with my Lord while my Sorc lord, hellcannons and warriors chew through his units, thats fine by me. People assume that KB is the be all end all of warhammer, and that Lords without KB protection are guaranteed to die, when simple tactics and thought while deployment should negate it 90% of the time. The times my lord will die from KB, which is probably somewhere close to one out of every ten games, I would like to believe that the rest of my army will succeed in some way, most likely due to a change of tactics on my opponents behalf.
The nine other games, where my Lord is chewing through units and hardly takes a scratch makes me believe that it is a viable tactic. I've played 7 games with this lord in 8th and have yet to come into contact with a model armed with KB. He has also never died in any of these games (playing against a competitive group with VC, DoC, Skaven, Empire and HE). The closest hes come to dying is against magic that causes stat tests and a couple cannon shots to the face, which luckily I was able to save or the wound d6 was low.