Page 115 of 217 FirstFirst ... 15 65 105 113 114 115 116 117 125 165 215 ... LastLast
Results 2,281 to 2,300 of 4324

Thread: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

  1. #2281
    Chapter Master Souleater's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    England
    Posts
    4,810

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    the entire squad has to upgrade. Shields are more than worth it, IMO.

  2. #2282
    Chapter Master Frankly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    ...this way... says the fox ....................
    Posts
    3,567

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by bebe View Post
    Really? I can field this ...

    Tervigon HQ
    3x 3 Hiveguard
    3x 10 Termagant
    3x Tervigon
    3x Trygon
    In 1850pts I play:

    2 x H.tryant + guard
    3 x Tervigons
    3 x 2 H.Guard

    All MCs with regen, you do actually want all they T6 units to sit on the same threat level and make your opponents target selection as hard as possible.

    I bring this up, because I think Necrons can do the same thing with MC's and wound allocation.

    I'm starting to build my soft theme list for softer 1750-1850pt tournaments, most likely looking like:

    HQ

    3 x scarabs

    2 x Immortals

    3 or 2 C'tans

    2 or 3 units of Spyders

    I played a few games each or 2 x Spyders and 3 x C'tan and the other way round.

    I ran Zahndrekh with Spyders with 3 units of 3 x beamers for some extra anti-tank pew pew, I think he's the most fun character for the list, shuffling around F.Charge on C'tans and T.Hunter and de-buffing is pretty fun.

    Having 9 Particle beamers in my Spyder units ate up my points but also changed how players viewed them on the tabletop, selecting to fire at them instead of scarabs or C'tan in positions they usually would be firing at Scarabs especially.

    Still, its very light on ranged anti-mech even for a fun list.

    The list mostly ran Thunder Bolt(fun the T.Hunter buff)+ L.o.Fire, W.Worldshape, M.o.Worlds + Pyreshards. I know Thunder bolt is costly, but its a heap of fun and again creates alot of threat for the unit.

    Anyhow fun to play, I had alots of terrain and chatted through most of the 6 games about army selection and so and so, but I really do like the feel of a Necron MC list.
    Last edited by Frankly; 18-12-2011 at 16:49.
    .......... alittle more ....... a little more.

  3. #2283
    Brother Sergeant
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    71

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Has anyone played against an eldar army composed of spam archons on motojet ?

  4. #2284
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Limerick
    Posts
    6,384

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by Souleater View Post
    the entire squad has to upgrade. Shields are more than worth it, IMO.
    They are, but it's too bad that in most lists the unit taking them isn't.

  5. #2285

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by GodlessM View Post
    And here it is again. I am starting to wonder if people are really stuck in a vacuum of hyperbole or if they just haven't read the Night Fighting rules, because people seem to think that it's a definite turn of safety, or in the case above, seem to think they'll have it all game.
    It's best to just ignore the absurd overstatements of Night Fighting in both directions. It seems to swing back and forth every couple of days. Monday through Wednesday it's "I have Imhotek! It is night! I am invincible!" and by Thursday it's "well SW/DE have Acute Senses so they don't even care, night fighting is pointless and stupid."

    Like I said before, it's a game mechanic most people just aren't accustomed to, at all. It was so rare for the DoW Night Fighting to actually affect a game that it's hard for people to see it in a larger context without swinging to one or the other extreme.

    Quote Originally Posted by a1elbow View Post
    A large portion of people posting on forums are not older players, but much younger players who are easily impressed with statements and opinions of older players. I see a lot of criticism of younger players, but probably those haven't been given a good example, either in their gaming area or on the internet.
    I've always wondered how much extra you have to pay for one of those internet connections that displays the age of everyone else on the internet, so as to enable you to make statements like this.

    Quote Originally Posted by a1elbow View Post
    Since my statement seems to be drawing much hate
    Well, what did you expect? The entirety of your first post containted nothing relevant to the thread--it was four paragraphs of "I don't normally post, but most of the people in this thread are annoying me, and I thought I'd chime in just to share that."

    I'm not sure where that would get you a positive outcome. Nonspecific hatred of vaguely-defined portions of the whole population you're addressing is unlikely to get you a round of applause or anything.

    It's one of those "if you don't have anything nice to say" scenarios.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aetaos View Post
    Has anyone played against an eldar army composed of spam archons on motojet ?
    This...will probably need a better translation. I think maybe you're talking about Warlocks? Like a Seer Council, presumably.

  6. #2286
    Brother Sergeant ascendedjesse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    72

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by meanmachine View Post
    i see most people arent liking tomb blades

    i think they are great for 20 points

    all i would do is take 5 with gause blasters for 100 points.

    20 points for a toughness 5, fast moving and coming back from the dead is a good deal to me

    the only reason i dont use them right now is because they have no model yet.

    at half the points of destroyers i would always take these guys over them.
    I love them, gives me something to do with my old destroyers. Of course I have been playing a hybrid lists, so their speed and shooting fits in nicely.

  7. #2287

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by GodlessM View Post
    Furthermore, what the hell does 'back it up with some numbers' mean? How can you back up the claim that there are too many annoying posters on a particular forum with numbers (short of counting everyone)?
    Mostly this:
    Quote Originally Posted by a1elbow View Post
    Suffice it to say, anyone who has been watching the discussion since the book hit the shelves has seen a ton of just stinker lists which include the Stormlord because the poster wanted to pretend NF would last more than half the game and lightning would smash everything apart.
    Stormlord with a solar pulse will have nightfight 3 turns 83% of the times (or zero, if he wants), which considering that game could end on turn 5, is more than half the game. a 2+ followed by a 3+ (56% chance) and then a solar pulse will extend nightfight to 4 turns, which is definately more than half the game.

    EDIT: Removed stuff that doesn't really pertain to a tactica discussion.
    Last edited by Infidel; 19-12-2011 at 02:26.

  8. #2288
    Chapter Master itcamefromthedeep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Davey Jones' Locker
    Posts
    2,108

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by meanmachine View Post
    i see most people arent liking tomb blades
    Tomb Blades are hilarious. Their background notes that they pretty much sit in the cockpit and press a button as the vehicle goes through a complicated pre-programmed route because the Necrons are *awful* pilots. It reminded me of that Lost in Space movie of all things: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NId8x0GyC4

    The unit is okay I guess. As I recall Tesla there sounds like a sucker-bet for now.

    ---

    Note: I just realized that a Night Scythe is like a clown car! This army took a turn for the AWESOME in my mind.

  9. #2289

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    The new Necrons are really good and I don't think many actually are able to take them out. The Deathray is a nice way to get rid of people that just droppoded, disembarked or otherwise deepstriked since the vehicles can move and shoot all their weapons.

    Tesla weapons is also a kick. Even though it's no AP, it's really dangerous for people with a lower save, like Orks, and even here the Death Ray will eat squads.

    The Monolith is still very good and a steal actually. Deepstrike it, keep it alive a round and then you might actually suck an entire unit, vehicle or whatever is in range if you're lucky.

    Scarabs Entropic is really dangerous for all of us.

    The ability to take away armorsaves for an entire game or make all their stats 1 is hilarious.

    And a 4+ save isn't bad, and ressurrect on 5+ isn't bad either. What should it be? 3+? You can ressurrect all damage!

    Your wraiths is never slowed down. Your boss can fly over and hit in the Movement phase.

    I can see no reason to complain as a Necron-player actually. All this stuff is really, really good.
    Last edited by Varulv; 19-12-2011 at 03:29.

  10. #2290

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by itcamefromthedeep View Post
    Tomb Blades are hilarious. Their background notes that they pretty much sit in the cockpit and press a button as the vehicle goes through a complicated pre-programmed route because the Necrons are *awful* pilots. It reminded me of that Lost in Space movie of all things: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NId8x0GyC4
    That's what they do in Star Trek too. The Captain chooses a maneuver that has been planned in advance and the helmsman basically hits the button. I believe they do that in the Honor Harrington universe too, because for semi-realistic space combat, you'd want to execute very high-G maneuvers and not everyone (if anyone) on the crew will be able to function during or immediately after such a maneuver, so everything is done by computer.

    Sure anyone can fly in a straight line or do a strafing run, but complex maneuvers with dozens or hundreds of other craft in formation at ridiculous speeds? I mean you could only use your best pilots for actual combat... or you could program in every single possibility and give the pilot the choice of which to execute at any given point. Then suddenly every pilot is an outstanding pilot.

    So yes, the warriors piloting the tomb blades may be terrible pilots in any other aircraft, but that's because they don't need to be good pilots. All one needs to "pilot" a tomb blade is to understand what each maneuvering package does and when to use it.

    I didn't think of their entry as "hilarious," but rather I saw it as insightful of Matt Ward to include that. Although I wonder why not just make tomb blades completely artificial intelligence rather than stick a warrior in it? Just have a single lord control an entire formation.
    Maneuver to create local superiority.
    Necron lists: Balanced (1.5k)

  11. #2291

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    The Batrep for my game against CSM is up, it can be found here.

    Any comment is welcome. Scythes is still a bit of a hit and miss for me, but their speed and damage potential is just unbelievable.

    Although, I am somewhat worried about any Tyranid lists with 9 hiveguards.

  12. #2292
    Brother Sergeant
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    71

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Yes DJ3 I was talking about warlocks sorry. I actually faced two units of those on motojets, and as i got completely crushed by this army, the warlocks being the main reason of my defeat, i wondered if we have anything in our dex able to hard-counter such a squad. I was thinking of wraiths: of course they are fast, strong and survivable, but ten warlocks and a farseer with chance guide is just too many singing spears. My own squad of six wraiths was send to oblivion in two turns ....
    Any thoughts about this. ?

  13. #2293

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sekhmet View Post

    So yes, the warriors piloting the tomb blades may be terrible pilots in any other aircraft, but that's because they don't need to be good pilots. All one needs to "pilot" a tomb blade is to understand what each maneuvering package does and when to use it.
    Actually that decision takes an amazing amount of insight, foresight and an insane amount of variables taking into account and is easily the hardest part about flying.

    The main reason necrons would be bad at it is because they're apparently slow. Which is rather silly because machines and computers being faster, more accurate and more reliable than the flesh is one of the main reasons we like to automate things. But hey, they needed a weakness.

  14. #2294

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by Aetaos View Post
    Yes DJ3 I was talking about warlocks sorry. I actually faced two units of those on motojets, and as i got completely crushed by this army, the warlocks being the main reason of my defeat, i wondered if we have anything in our dex able to hard-counter such a squad. I was thinking of wraiths: of course they are fast, strong and survivable, but ten warlocks and a farseer with chance guide is just too many singing spears. My own squad of six wraiths was send to oblivion in two turns ....
    Any thoughts about this. ?
    We do and it's called Scarabs.

    Their Witchblade is a weapon that always wounds on 2+ and does not ignore armour save, meaning that the unit will have to eat through the scarab swarms one wound at a time. If you have means to add bases to it, then that seer council is not going to be doing anything else for the rest of the game.

    Wraiths also do a good job bogging them down, but against (most likely) rerollable 3+/4++, your best bet is to tie them down and kill the rest of the army. Bike council is NOT cheap, not in the slightest.

  15. #2295
    Librarian
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    359

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by snottlebocket View Post
    The main reason necrons would be bad at it is because they're apparently slow. Which is rather silly because machines and computers being faster, more accurate and more reliable than the flesh is one of the main reasons we like to automate things. But hey, they needed a weakness.
    Machines are quicker, yes. But flying by 'feel' is a heuristic. Heuristics is one of the few things humans are absolutely amazing at, and our ability gets a huge increase with training.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sekhmet View Post
    That's what they do in Star Trek too. The Captain chooses a maneuver that has been planned in advance and the helmsman basically hits the button. I believe they do that in the Honor Harrington universe too, because for semi-realistic space combat, you'd want to execute very high-G maneuvers and not everyone (if anyone) on the crew will be able to function during or immediately after such a maneuver, so everything is done by computer.
    I accidentally deleted your 2nd paragraph also, on my phone, hard to get it back. The 'in a fleet' argument is incredibly relevant for flight patterns. But in the series you can also see pilots flying by hand, especially in a 1 on 1 fight and the LAC fights later in the series. I forget which novel, the chase fight has a pre-programmed S flight for chasing and sneaking in broadsides, but the pilot is tweaking it for better defensive and offensive ability based on how he's seeing the lead ship react.

    So, relating to Tomb Blades: There have been tremendous calculations and analysis to come up with these attack patterns with tons of considerations for survivability and damage output. The 'pilot' selecting the flight program does not have the processing power to create a better flight on the spot, and being a drone class necron, it does not have the personality left to do a heuristic adjustment.

    ~dy

  16. #2296
    Chapter Master fwacho's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    1,299

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by bebe View Post
    Thank you Sekhmet for sorting out my tongue in cheek post. Seriously, i do agree that footslogging lists can be very effective. Look at my sig. You see when everyone targets vehicles and you don't bring any suddenly your opponent has wasted a lot of points on units that are not so useful. A Nid list on foot can bring over 50 T6 wounds to the table almost all with cover saves turn one if played smartly.
    .
    someone stole my nid list. at 2500 pt 'ard boy format it can still have almost 167 wounds starting if you drop it down 36 T6 wounds. I haven't tried it against necrons though. i would guess gauss wouldn't affect it much not the difficult terrain shenagins, nor night fight (more of a help there)
    The OBJECT of the game is to win. The POINT of the game is to have FUN! Never confuse the two. --- Zoolander
    stolen from "Edonil"


    click on the link to see My attempted campaign. pic of army and link to my book there as well.

  17. #2297

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by fluffstalker View Post
    Phaz may I ask how do you run your lychguard, as in, how many warscythes versus shields and swords? Or do you go all war-scythes and rely on night fight and cover? I'm asking because I go up against a GK/BT player alot and he's awful tough in cc especially those BT LC termies. I just don't have enough attacks to kill him even on the charge before he shreds me...and taking out a crusader without melta to stop him charging is a bit of a pain without some very lucky rolling.
    All shields and a lord with a WS, Orb, and Mind Scarabs. This is the best way to run the unit, in my personal opinion. Trazyn just adds scoring and anti-horde to the mix.

  18. #2298

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by Wyked View Post
    So, relating to Tomb Blades: There have been tremendous calculations and analysis to come up with these attack patterns with tons of considerations for survivability and damage output. The 'pilot' selecting the flight program does not have the processing power to create a better flight on the spot, and being a drone class necron, it does not have the personality left to do a heuristic adjustment.

    ~dy
    In a deterministic system the victor of a simulation such as that of a tomb blade versus unguided ordanances will always be the side with more computing power, unless you introduce a degree of randomness.

    Having a single routine overseeing the flight pattern of a whole squadron of tomb blade is probably not idea - if the pattern is deciphered, then every tomb blade will easily fall to enemy ship's CIWS or air defense. How ever little, the individuality inherent in the Warriors will give you that randomness needed to defeat predictive systems.

  19. #2299
    Commander Necr0n's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Athens,GR
    Posts
    505

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Here's a random question I wanna ask you guys, anyone know when the new wave is out and what it's gonna come with?

  20. #2300

    Re: Tactica: 5th edition Necrons codex.

    Quote Originally Posted by Infidel View Post
    In a deterministic system the victor of a simulation such as that of a tomb blade versus unguided ordanances will always be the side with more computing power, unless you introduce a degree of randomness.

    Having a single routine overseeing the flight pattern of a whole squadron of tomb blade is probably not idea - if the pattern is deciphered, then every tomb blade will easily fall to enemy ship's CIWS or air defense. How ever little, the individuality inherent in the Warriors will give you that randomness needed to defeat predictive systems.
    Warriors are machines too. Yes, they started life as organic, but they are not organic anymore. Randomness can be simulated to a very good degree by computer systems, even today, without user input. You can even use quantum probability for 100% random number generation. You don't need life to get random results, so the warriors really can be cut out of the equation.
    Maneuver to create local superiority.
    Necron lists: Balanced (1.5k)

Page 115 of 217 FirstFirst ... 15 65 105 113 114 115 116 117 125 165 215 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •