Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

  1. #1
    Veteran Sergeant Orion pax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    79

    Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    Veteran Gangs
    "The grouchy old men of the underhive"

    http://kenzie213.blogspot.com/2011/1...ecromunda.html

  2. #2
    Veteran Sergeant Orion pax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    79

    Re: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    If anyone has any ideas on how to improve or any additional ideas please let me know
    all feedback is welcome

  3. #3
    Chapter Master Askil the Undecided's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Shoreham, West Sussex, UK
    Posts
    1,869

    Re: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    Why not just re-roll dead too? I'd be easier than this invented pair of rather irritating turn-by-turn injuries?
    Quote Originally Posted by Spider-pope View Post
    Also, i think Askil should be hired by GW immediately and take over all future fluff development for 40k.
    Quote Originally Posted by blackcherry View Post
    I think this [...] goes to prove that if nothing else, Askil really should be in charge of the background for Chaos. He clearly gets just gets it.

  4. #4
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    1,935

    Re: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    Why not just re-roll dead too? I'd be easier than this invented pair of rather irritating turn-by-turn injuries?
    I agree with Askil on this one, those sound more annoying than anything else. If you're going to keep "Catatonia" though I think you need to clarify what you mean by the model cannot fight in combat. What happens if the fighter is successfully charged and engaged in HtH combat? Do they automatically lose and are taken straight Out Of Action?

    Something else which I think could be clarified, can you recruit a regular leader rather than a Veteran one? It isn't made 100% clear as you only state: "Leader: Your Veteran gang must have only one leader." If it is your intention the following makes it much less ambiguous: "Leader: Your Veteran gang must have one Veteran leader."

    Aside from that, it looks a reasonably good stab at shortcutting the development process a bit.

    One thought that does occur to me, as they're a Veteran Gang, surely they'll have had the chance to come across some of the more exotic equipment? Maybe allow them a fixed or variable number of rolls on the rare trade chart? I'd say maybe 4 or D3+2 rolls. I'd consider allowing them access to all Common items from the outset too.
    Quote Originally Posted by brightblade View Post
    If Marmite is Satan's toe jam (which it is) then Vegemite is certainly at least his gritty bellybutton goo.

  5. #5
    Veteran Sergeant Orion pax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    79

    Re: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    Hey Guys thanks for the feedback and i have amended some of the items

    Wanderlust : At the start of the turn roll a d6 On a roll of 1, the model moves its movement in a random direction indicated by the scatter dice, this model can still fight normally if it is successfully charged in close combat

    Underhive catatonia: At the start of the turn roll a d6, On a roll of 1 the model does nothing. it remains stationary and cannot fight in combat or become pinned. Attackers hit automaticly in close combat but still have to roll to wound, with armour saves allowed.

    i do agree with Simonr1978, and it the equipment is something i have been pondering fo a while.

    - half price weapons for initial buy (but still count as full price for gang rating)
    - d3 + Number of members in the Veteran gang rolls on the rare trade chart. (i see this as the old veterans using their contacts, so more contacts the better)

  6. #6
    Librarian
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    338

    Re: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    Does wonderlust prevent the model from preforming other actions that turn and does 'this model can still fight normally if it is successfully charged in close combat' mean that the model fights normally if it randomly charged or only that the model fights normally if charged. What happens to models already in cc?

  7. #7
    Veteran Sergeant Orion pax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    79

    Re: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    Quote Originally Posted by AsleepByDay View Post
    Does wonderlust prevent the model from preforming other actions that turn and does 'this model can still fight normally if it is successfully charged in close combat' mean that the model fights normally if it randomly charged or only that the model fights normally if charged. What happens to models already in cc?
    Good point!

    If the model is already engaged in close combat the dice for wanderlust and underhive catatonia dont need to be rolled.

    Wanderlust : At the start of the turn roll a d6 On a roll of 1, the model moves its full movement in a random direction indicated by the scatter dice, this model can still fight normally if it is successfully charged in close combat or if it randomly moves into base to base contact with an enemy model.'It can still preform any other actions.

  8. #8
    Chapter Master Askil the Undecided's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Shoreham, West Sussex, UK
    Posts
    1,869

    Re: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    It seem to me you've listened to and then totally misunderstood the initial criticism offered.

    Catatonia and wanderlust sound massively irritating as they are basically a low-risk head wound, but are determined on a turn by turn basis requiring frequent rolling.

    If you simply re-rolled results of Dead you would still have a range of injuries without having to invent some fiddly new ones.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spider-pope View Post
    Also, i think Askil should be hired by GW immediately and take over all future fluff development for 40k.
    Quote Originally Posted by blackcherry View Post
    I think this [...] goes to prove that if nothing else, Askil really should be in charge of the background for Chaos. He clearly gets just gets it.

  9. #9
    Veteran Sergeant Orion pax's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    79

    Re: Veteran Gangs - Grumpy gangers

    The main reasson that i kept them and why they can happen frequently in the games is that i deem it as one step up from the dead result. It is something that only verteran gangs can have. As far as new rules, they really aren't that complex to stall the game.

    The playtests i have had the players enjoyed there gangers doing unexpected things (good and bad). In most of the veteran gangs you are looking at maybe just the one ganger affected with one of the two results.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •