Page 270 of 274 FirstFirst ... 170 220 260 268 269 270 271 272 ... LastLast
Results 5,381 to 5,400 of 5471

Thread: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

  1. #5381
    Commander destroyerlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tasmania, Aus
    Posts
    979

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    The KFF went back to 5+ for vehicles (we all knew that would happen), meks can opt to heal 1 hull point instead of weap destroyed or immob, the deff rolla has been errata'ed to work against vehicles, not just faq 'ed.
    Can models on bikes get an extra attack for 2 hand weapons? Regardless of the answer bike characters got a significant boost against instant death from fists and meltas. Obliterators have true T5 again too! Nice.
    Save the Whales!

    Quote Originally Posted by unclejoe
    Also, if my mighty Damp Piece of Hay is good enough to kill a magically pumped up enemy, I might decide to stick with the soggy option.
    Quote Originally Posted by Arkondak View Post
    Eating daemons might actually be a good idea. If what i hear about the new codex is correct, if you just cook them up with a can of lash spam, they should be cheesy and delicious.

  2. #5382
    Scout
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wrocław, Poland
    Posts
    6

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Ok I found something that is a huuuuge possible cheese. But I need you guys to think if it is possible.
    So Necron CCB got its "Sweep" rule wich allows a charachter on top to make 3 passing attacks.
    Then in 6th ed in got Chariot unit type which among other things gives it a "Sweeping attack" USR allowing the Char on top to make passing attacks equal to his profile.
    Necron FAQ does not state anything like "Page 52: Necron Catacomb Command Barge :Ignore Sweep Special Rule". And so I started to wonder is it possible to make 6 attacks with an Overlord on the CCB?
    I know its bending, streching etc. but what do you think?

  3. #5383
    Commander xerxeshavelock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    845

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Daoshifu View Post
    Ok I found something that is a huuuuge possible cheese. But I need you guys to think if it is possible.
    So Necron CCB got its "Sweep" rule wich allows a charachter on top to make 3 passing attacks.
    Then in 6th ed in got Chariot unit type which among other things gives it a "Sweeping attack" USR allowing the Char on top to make passing attacks equal to his profile.
    Necron FAQ does not state anything like "Page 52: Necron Catacomb Command Barge :Ignore Sweep Special Rule". And so I started to wonder is it possible to make 6 attacks with an Overlord on the CCB?
    I know its bending, streching etc. but what do you think?
    This may be a time where you invoke the phrase "If you have to ask..."
    Warseer - destruction testing 40k since 2005!

    "The more you playtest, the more you find out about playtesters" - Rick Priestley

  4. #5384
    Chapter Master Excessus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Ghorstangrad
    Posts
    1,640

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by destroyerlord View Post
    Obliterators have true T5 again too! Nice.
    Which codex are you using? That's not in mine...

  5. #5385
    Scout
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wrocław, Poland
    Posts
    6

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by xerxeshavelock View Post
    This may be a time where you invoke the phrase "If you have to ask..."
    What i meant is to ask if you guys see or know of anything in the rules that would prevent that. Aside of course of common sense.

  6. #5386
    Commander xerxeshavelock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Wiltshire, UK
    Posts
    845

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Daoshifu View Post
    What i meant is to ask if you guys see or know of anything in the rules that would prevent that. Aside of course of common sense.
    I don't have the rules to hand so it may be possible, however until it is clear that won't be my interpretation. You never know - they may decide they are meant to be badass and allow it.
    Warseer - destruction testing 40k since 2005!

    "The more you playtest, the more you find out about playtesters" - Rick Priestley

  7. #5387

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    As far as assaulting vehicles, is there any difference between assaulting a Rhino moving 3" and a Wave Serpent Moving 24"? I see they have WS now but does movement modify anything anymore?

  8. #5388
    Scout
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wrocław, Poland
    Posts
    6

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by mercury14 View Post
    As far as assaulting vehicles, is there any difference between assaulting a Rhino moving 3" and a Wave Serpent Moving 24"? I see they have WS now but does movement modify anything anymore?
    As far as I know if a vehicle moved it has WS1 if it didn't move it has WS0 (except walkers). You penetrate rear armor (except walkers). At the end of combat you count each glance as 1 wound and each pen as 2 wounds.

    Thats all I could find.

  9. #5389

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by althathir View Post
    Yep, as of now.

    its in the back of the book, they're classified as In (ch).

    So little warlocks can issue challenges? lol cool.

    So if a Warlock challenges Dante and he accepts and wins the duel 3-0, do those wounds count as part of the overall battle to determine which side wins?

  10. #5390

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Daoshifu View Post
    As far as I know if a vehicle moved it has WS1 if it didn't move it has WS0 (except walkers). You penetrate rear armor (except walkers). At the end of combat you count each glance as 1 wound and each pen as 2 wounds.

    Thats all I could find.

    If movement doesn't help skimmers avoid CC attacks and they just get walloped in their back armor as easily as if they were parked, that's utter crap.
    Last edited by mercury14; 01-07-2012 at 11:28.

  11. #5391

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Daoshifu View Post
    Ok I found something that is a huuuuge possible cheese. But I need you guys to think if it is possible.
    So Necron CCB got its "Sweep" rule wich allows a charachter on top to make 3 passing attacks.
    Then in 6th ed in got Chariot unit type which among other things gives it a "Sweeping attack" USR allowing the Char on top to make passing attacks equal to his profile.
    Necron FAQ does not state anything like "Page 52: Necron Catacomb Command Barge :Ignore Sweep Special Rule". And so I started to wonder is it possible to make 6 attacks with an Overlord on the CCB?
    I know its bending, streching etc. but what do you think?
    If you are going to those depths to rules lawyer then you are desparate indeed - it is clearly not the intent and that would be a constructive attempt to break the rules. Personally if you were playing me or in a tournament I was running I would tell you to GTFO. I am not going to even look at rules, because if a rules arguement starts it doesn't say it doesn't then it time to switch off and accept your playing one of 'those' gamers

  12. #5392
    Commander destroyerlord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Tasmania, Aus
    Posts
    979

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Excessus View Post
    Which codex are you using? That's not in mine...
    Oh. Whoops. I don't have my dex on me but I totally thought they were still 4(5). At least people might consider bike characters now for the extra T.
    Save the Whales!

    Quote Originally Posted by unclejoe
    Also, if my mighty Damp Piece of Hay is good enough to kill a magically pumped up enemy, I might decide to stick with the soggy option.
    Quote Originally Posted by Arkondak View Post
    Eating daemons might actually be a good idea. If what i hear about the new codex is correct, if you just cook them up with a can of lash spam, they should be cheesy and delicious.

  13. #5393
    Scout
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Wrocław, Poland
    Posts
    6

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Thuggrim View Post
    If you are going to those depths to rules lawyer then you are desparate indeed - it is clearly not the intent and that would be a constructive attempt to break the rules. Personally if you were playing me or in a tournament I was running I would tell you to GTFO. I am not going to even look at rules, because if a rules arguement starts it doesn't say it doesn't then it time to switch off and accept your playing one of 'those' gamers
    You know if you dont want tot start with "it does not say it doesn't" I may as well stick with " I apply what I see. so I see 2 different rules on the same model from two different sources. and I think of it as of getting +1 save from the weave item and +1 save from being on a chariot (not for OL of course as it would take him below 2+). Two different rules on the same model from two different sources.
    I'm not saying I'll use it I'm just saying I stpotted it and I know pleanty of guys that will use it along with +1 attack for Spyders or power axe for praetorians.

  14. #5394

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    I need to ask you a question about the fearless rule.

    In the french book we got something more :
    "Fearless units can't have more than 5+ cover save."

    Is there something like that somewhere in the UK version ?

    It's disturbing because a lot of units like, vindicares, lictors, imperial statue, night fight (and more) don't make sense anymore.
    Is there someone with another language (like spanish, german or italian) who can confirm this ?

    Thank you.

  15. #5395
    Chapter Master itcamefromthedeep's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Davey Jones' Locker
    Posts
    2,108

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Iblitz View Post
    I need to ask you a question about the fearless rule.

    In the french book we got something more :
    "Fearless units can't have more than 5+ cover save."
    I see no such clause under the Fearless entry on page 35. I also haven't seen that in the cover rules.

  16. #5396

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by itcamefromthedeep View Post
    I see no such clause under the Fearless entry on page 35. I also haven't seen that in the cover rules.
    I can give you a scan of the french paragraph if you need .

  17. #5397
    Librarian Toadius80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Brzcknell
    Posts
    326
    Must be a miss print.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
    www.bracknellwargamers.co.uk

    Quote Originally Posted by Count de Monet View Post
    What to use for a Deathstrike Missile Launcher? Easy. Chimera hull. Big slingshot. Chuck Norris.
    Trade thread: currently Warhammer Empire Army, Deamons, Orks, Warmachine
    http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=247177

  18. #5398

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Daoshifu View Post
    You know if you dont want tot start with "it does not say it doesn't" I may as well stick with " I apply what I see. so I see 2 different rules on the same model from two different sources. and I think of it as of getting +1 save from the weave item and +1 save from being on a chariot (not for OL of course as it would take him below 2+). Two different rules on the same model from two different sources.
    I'm not saying I'll use it I'm just saying I stpotted it and I know pleanty of guys that will use it along with +1 attack for Spyders or power axe for praetorians.
    Fair play, its that sort of stuff that made me step away from the tourney scene. Shame as you cn meet great people and see stunning armies

  19. #5399

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    Quote Originally Posted by Toadius80 View Post
    Must be a miss print.

    Sent from my GT-I9100 using Tapatalk 2
    A missprint ? who ?
    Something forgot from the original version ?
    Something wrongly translated from an invisible paragraph ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	sanspeur.jpg 
Views:	299 
Size:	17.9 KB 
ID:	144292
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	capturedcran20120630123.png 
Views:	298 
Size:	125.5 KB 
ID:	144293

    Here both of the complete paragraph, one from the french book (so you can see the last part with the cover save problem), and the original (complete) without the cover save part.
    Another language will help us so much
    Last edited by Iblitz; 01-07-2012 at 14:06.

  20. #5400
    Chaplain Bold_or_Stupid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Lancaster, UK
    Posts
    235

    Re: Official WarSeer Warhammer 40,000 6th Edition discussion thread

    What does two-handed on melee weapons do? Is it just purely you can't use anything else with them?
    Quote Originally Posted by Col. Tartleton View Post
    But they aren't a Chapter of Marines so much as a fraternity of the most murderous lycanthropic savages in the galaxy...

Page 270 of 274 FirstFirst ... 170 220 260 268 269 270 271 272 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •