Page 98 of 146 FirstFirst ... 48 88 96 97 98 99 100 108 ... LastLast
Results 1,941 to 1,960 of 2903

Thread: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

  1. #1941
    Librarian Graystoak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    318

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by DeviLution View Post
    In the reality you live in, or the reality I live in?

    Seriously. Traitor guard are more than just Guard armies with spikes. Where's a traitor guard list that has marks? Mutants? Spawn? Daemons? Daemon Engines? Maybe even Marines as cannon fodder herders?

    And don't tell me Lost and Damned from the EoT book, either, because we both know there's zero point in using that.

    Try this: http://www.forgeworld.co.uk/Download...F/i/IA5_RH.pdf

  2. #1942

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Excessus View Post
    Jumping in on the traitor guard thing, sorry. Seriously, it takes an astartes to get +1A from khorne, what would a regular mortal get, +½A? I really don't know why marks would be something more than a visual and fluffy thing in renegade guard armies... I agree that they could use rules for daemons and such, but that's what apoc and double plays are for. I'm quite content with using the IG codex for my traitors, or the FW list.

    The rumours don't seem to support them being in the new codex anyway, and even the Alpha Legion don't need upgraded cultists, we use our deviousness in other areas anyway...
    Hmm, looking at it from that point of view... yeah, I can see that.

    Quote Originally Posted by Excessus View Post
    ...so, did I hear correctly that the new CSM codex was to be hardcover?
    Rumors elsewhere here on WarSeer, concerning the incoming price hike if I recall rightly, indicated that 40k army books would remain paperback.
    GW seems to me to be like... a trireme. One that's caught in a maelstrom, with accountants at the oars all on one side pulling for money, and gamers on the other pulling to get out of the maelstrom... and where Captain Jervis is sipping tea at the wheel, looking aft, thinking he's standing at the bow looking forward, with a wispy smile and a vacantly amused expression on his face, oblivious to it all. Who wins in the end... the gamers, or the accountants?
    Neither. The maelstrom wins.

  3. #1943

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by DeviLution View Post
    Hmm, looking at it from that point of view... yeah, I can see that.



    Rumors elsewhere here on WarSeer, concerning the incoming price hike if I recall rightly, indicated that 40k army books would remain paperback.
    Haven't been keeping up with the price hike threads, but I've seen it mentioned here, if anyone is interested. It's only a rumour from a redshirt, but it's worth considering.

    To be honest, I don't mind if it's hardcover or soft (and if it's full colour, then all the better!). Softcover at least suggests that they'll stay in the same price bracket.

  4. #1944
    Commander
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    525

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Graystoak View Post
    This makes a lot of sense now you say it, as players were esentially limited to a Marine or Deamon Troop option and a few other things that could have their mark. But compared to building a legion list with the 4th Codex? Now we're limits to a single troop choice and that's about it as your other list entries only have icons not marks. And to make matters worse the only points effective HQ in the current Codex is the Deamon prince which many feel is cheep as chips.
    The reason to why the current CSM Daemon Prince is cheap is because the CSM codex is little old and the other recent codex containing Monsterous creatures (Tyranids and Daemons) are more recent and have been given an enormus point increase beyond what they are really worth.
    The Tyranids MC are too expensive in pts and as well are Daemon Prince from the Daemon codex.
    They need to meet in the middle somewhere.
    But this is little too off topic anyway.
    Last edited by Dark Primus; 25-05-2012 at 16:05.
    Originally Posted by IJW
    "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... It's a demon, kill it! Kill it with fire!"

  5. #1945
    Marine SlippyFist's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Barossa Valley, South Australia
    Posts
    17

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    One thing i'm hoping for is they redesign oblits into a plastic kits and not get lazy and failcast them. the metal ones are expensive and ugly!
    Last edited by SlippyFist; 25-05-2012 at 20:42. Reason: rewording

  6. #1946
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    United States, Texas Currently.
    Posts
    1,233

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    My view (and I'm not happy about it) is that we are likely losing the Daemon Prince altogether. We will get to use them via "allies."

  7. #1947

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Cheexsta View Post
    Haven't been keeping up with the price hike threads, but I've seen it mentioned here, if anyone is interested. It's only a rumour from a redshirt, but it's worth considering.

    To be honest, I don't mind if it's hardcover or soft (and if it's full colour, then all the better!). Softcover at least suggests that they'll stay in the same price bracket.
    Hah! That was the post I was recalling. Right church (rumor), wrong pew (thread), hehe.
    GW seems to me to be like... a trireme. One that's caught in a maelstrom, with accountants at the oars all on one side pulling for money, and gamers on the other pulling to get out of the maelstrom... and where Captain Jervis is sipping tea at the wheel, looking aft, thinking he's standing at the bow looking forward, with a wispy smile and a vacantly amused expression on his face, oblivious to it all. Who wins in the end... the gamers, or the accountants?
    Neither. The maelstrom wins.

  8. #1948

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Caitsidhe View Post
    My view (and I'm not happy about it) is that we are likely losing the Daemon Prince altogether. We will get to use them via "allies."
    Daemon Prince is rather iconic for CSM, especially the Daemon Primarchs. The kit has parts to make it appear similar to Chaos Marines, with the backpack, armor, and shoulder pads. Daemon Princes will stay, just like Posessed and Obliterators, all of which are Daemon/CSM hybrids. Lesser and Greater Daemons, though, will likely be going away.
    "As I've always said, Wes is wise." - Scryer in the Darkness
    "Wes, if you keep this up you'll need to change your name to MajorWiseJanson." - Azzy
    "Many boffins died to bring us this information." - Forgeworld Announcement E-mail
    "Rest assured, Servitor 13 has your best interests at heart. Now let's fire up the lascannons." - GW changes their web privacy policy.

  9. #1949

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    At the risk of wishlisting, it wouldn't take much to make me happy on Word Bearers. An entry for a Dark Apostle with Chaplain-esque rules, and an entry for Cultists. I have the fluff on them a thousand times over, not the least of which was in their Chapter Approved article. All these rumors about them getting some sort of Daemonancer unit/character are just icing on the cake.

    I tend to think the same is true for most of the other Legions. Give the Iron Warriors their Warsmith and options for cybernetics. Give Alpha Legion something fitting their role in psyops and infiltrations missions. It doesn't have to be a huge amount of new options, just a couple special rules, a new unit, or a new HQ.

  10. #1950
    Commander Reivax26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Jamestown TN
    Posts
    536

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    If there is one group that should be able to take a few units out of the Daemons codex it should be Word Bearers. Everyone else I don't think really need it. I also would like to see Chaos Lords get to take Daemonic Gifts again and the Daemon Prince be 0-1. I want to be able to customize a Chaos Lord so that he isn't just a cheap alternative to a Special Character.

  11. #1951
    Librarian geoffkemp's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Essex,UK
    Posts
    493

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    On the subject of "allies", how did the deamonhunters and witchhunters handle the guard and space-marine components. I knew they could take them, but not sure of the mechcanic in the rule-book. Would this work with regard to deamons or traitor guard in a legion dex?
    Geoff
    Ah, hey everyone. I've been looking for a new roleplaying game ever since my Lord Of The Rings-club booted me for using an actual warhammer, so would anyone mind if I pretended to be Chief of Medicine while Kelso is out of town?

    The Janitor, Scrubs

  12. #1952
    Commander Reivax26's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Jamestown TN
    Posts
    536

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    I ran a custom chapter of Space Marines back in 4th that had a squad of Grey Knights being led by a Grand Master as an allies choice. They rocked. Basically back then it was 0-1 HQ, 0-1 Elites, -0-2 Troops, 0-1 Fast Attack. You couldn't take Heavy's from other books. None of the choices could be the compulsory choices either so you couldn't take the 2 allied troops as your 2 troops that you had to take. It would be really easy to do this for Chaos and let them do that with Guard or Daemons as their Allies. It wouldn't break the balance of anything. I'm sure people would cry the first time you borrowed a Bloodthirster or Fateweaver from the Daemons but oh well they would get over it. Guard could give you some Platoons or maybe Melta Vets. Well, the Vets wouldn't really do you more good than Plague Marines in Rhinos except that they would have Chimera's to ride in. Although the first time anyone used a Vendetta or Valkyrie as an allied unit people would scream "cheese" and ragequit. Now that I think of it....I want to see that!

  13. #1953
    Veteran Sergeant Alaric Stormblade's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Stuttgart, Germany
    Posts
    125

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by geoffkemp View Post
    On the subject of "allies", how did the deamonhunters and witchhunters handle the guard and space-marine components. I knew they could take them, but not sure of the mechcanic in the rule-book. Would this work with regard to deamons or traitor guard in a legion dex?
    You had the option to take a limited amount of choices from the Guard/Marines Codex, however they couldn't be any of your mandatory choices (so you had to take 2 of your own troops + a squad of Marines). Allied Marines were not allowed, if Grey Knights were present in the army, (same fpr Daemonhosts btw.). You had to take two of your allied troops choices, then you could take fast attack or support choices. And you couldn't have both Marines and Guard at the same time.

    However with the new Grey Knights and Sisters of Battle army lists GW abandonned that system. The reason being, that they wanted you to be able to play your army with just one book and not two. Also, as the new Guard Codex was released, there were a whole lot of issues with the entries you were allowed to take. As said before GW abandoned that system, so the only way we are going to see "true" daemons in the Chaos Marine book is by copying&pasting the entries from the Daemon book. This however is possible, as they already did it with the Harlequins for Eldar and Dark Eldar and the retinue in the Sisters of Battle and Grey Knights lists.
    Real gamers play face to face! With fully painted armies!

    Check out my Daemonhunters/Grey Knights Log. Thanks.

  14. #1954

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Reivax26 View Post
    I ran a custom chapter of Space Marines back in 4th that had a squad of Grey Knights being led by a Grand Master as an allies choice. They rocked. Basically back then it was 0-1 HQ, 0-1 Elites, -0-2 Troops, 0-1 Fast Attack. You couldn't take Heavy's from other books. None of the choices could be the compulsory choices either so you couldn't take the 2 allied troops as your 2 troops that you had to take. It would be really easy to do this for Chaos and let them do that with Guard or Daemons as their Allies. It wouldn't break the balance of anything. I'm sure people would cry the first time you borrowed a Bloodthirster or Fateweaver from the Daemons but oh well they would get over it. Guard could give you some Platoons or maybe Melta Vets. Well, the Vets wouldn't really do you more good than Plague Marines in Rhinos except that they would have Chimera's to ride in. Although the first time anyone used a Vendetta or Valkyrie as an allied unit people would scream "cheese" and ragequit. Now that I think of it....I want to see that!
    Given that 6th edition has been rumoured to include rules for allies (which I can only assume will be optional, for balance reasons), I could actually see something like that being applied as a general rule. CSM armies with a few units of Daemon support would be nice (as would Daemon armies with CSM support!), and if those rumours have a grain of truth in them, then it's entirely possible.

    It'd be a pretty nifty way for GW to actually encourage people to step outside of their comfort zone and get a few units from another army, and then become inspired to buy the rest of the army afterwards. Would certainly make cross-sales easier for GW employees, that's for sure.

  15. #1955
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Knoxville, Tn
    Posts
    1,579

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    those rumors seem largely sparked by a tournaments special rules, which were rules that it's had for a long time.

    Unless I'm mistaken and these have come from elsewhere, which I doubt.
    Win/Ties/Loss:
    Tau 27/2/8 2009, 5/0/2 2012, 1/0/0 2013
    Greyknights 17/3/4 2011, 47/4/11 2012

  16. #1956
    Librarian Graystoak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    London
    Posts
    318

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Think we're in danger of going off topic again here as this allies thing is more a 6th ed rumour than a chaos one...

    But if they do allow entries from the current Deamon codex (or Imp Guard for that matter) to be used in the new Chaos Marine Codex (see what I did there?), they'll have to heavily restrict the options. There would be some truly horrible combo's if people we're given free range of another Codex. A plague marine army led by Epidemius? Iron Warriors with Baneblades? Air born Khorne Berzerkers! I can't see it happening as the beards would kill the game with their rule bending.

  17. #1957

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Primus View Post
    The reason to why the current CSM Daemon Prince is cheap is because the CSM codex is little old and the other recent codex containing Monsterous creatures (Tyranids and Daemons) are more recent and have been given an enormus point increase beyond what they are really worth.
    The Tyranids MC are too expensive in pts and as well are Daemon Prince from the Daemon codex.
    They need to meet in the middle somewhere.
    But this is little too off topic anyway.

    I'm sorry, but the GK Dread Knight and DE Talos would like to have a word with you on that enormous point cost.

  18. #1958

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Graystoak View Post
    Think we're in danger of going off topic again here as this allies thing is more a 6th ed rumour than a chaos one...
    Fair call. I'll make any further comment on a potential Allies rule in the 6th edition thread, and encourage everyone else to do the same

  19. #1959
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Canada Usually, South Korea Currently
    Posts
    1,567

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Graystoak View Post
    Think we're in danger of going off topic again here as this allies thing is more a 6th ed rumour than a chaos one...

    But if they do allow entries from the current Deamon codex (or Imp Guard for that matter) to be used in the new Chaos Marine Codex (see what I did there?), they'll have to heavily restrict the options. There would be some truly horrible combo's if people we're given free range of another Codex. A plague marine army led by Epidemius? Iron Warriors with Baneblades? Air born Khorne Berzerkers! I can't see it happening as the beards would kill the game with their rule bending.
    The allies rumor solves a the problems with no demons in the CSM book, as well as cultists, which could be represented by IG. I'm sure if it is true, they'll clarify the rules a bit. Probably that you're main army has to be a certain portion of your army, as do your HQs. And with it being a new edition, they may reprice much, so that things add up better (or worse).

  20. #1960
    Commander
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    525

    Re: Codex: Chaos Legions rumours

    Quote Originally Posted by Draconis View Post
    I'm sorry, but the GK Dread Knight and DE Talos would like to have a word with you on that enormous point cost.
    Sure, I am happy to listen to Mr. GK Dread Knight and the DE Talos.
    Originally Posted by IJW
    "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck... It's a demon, kill it! Kill it with fire!"

Page 98 of 146 FirstFirst ... 48 88 96 97 98 99 100 108 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •