Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 85

Thread: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

  1. #41
    Commander prowla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    FIN
    Posts
    886

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    By the way, there's a bit in A Thousand Sons where Ahriman sees a strong glimpse of future, and one part of it are "Ravens of Blood". Not to mention Ahriman's fellowship is The Corvidae and their symbol a black raven's head.

    There's been a lot of mentions in HH series about the two missing legions. Maybe they'll get themselves written, one day

  2. #42
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    90

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kenzaburo View Post
    it has been widely speculated that the blood ravens might be descendants of the thousand sons. it has been hinted at in the games time and time again and even mcneill played with that idea in thousand sons - during prospero's destruction i think, there was a vision of a raven and whatnot.
    In one of the HH short story compilations there is a Thousand Sons VS World Eaters piece set in the aftermath of Prospero Burns. Basically a Thousand Son makes his way beneath one of the great libraries and makes off with a psychic staff of some kind with a Raven clutching a drop of blood as the head of the staff.

  3. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    London
    Posts
    90

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by prowla View Post
    There's been a lot of mentions in HH series about the two missing legions. Maybe they'll get themselves written, one day
    We know that one of the missing legions was wiped out by the Space Wolves. Can't remember which short story it's from though.

  4. #44

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by Israfael View Post
    Honestly, I've been part of this hobby for years - and never seen anyone take advantage of this. Every DIY chapter I've encountered - in several different clubs - are always a successor of one of the current originals.

    I'm starting to wonder if anyone ever did.
    Didn't say it was well executed just that the intent was for people to be able to do it. I think people get quite abit of comfort out of having set rules/fluff from the existing chapters, and see the lack of rules and fluff as drawbacks.

    Quote Originally Posted by Twisted Ferret View Post
    I don't think it's ever stated he was reunited with the Primarchs of the II and XI legions; they were created, and either something went wrong, or they were scattered with the rest of the Primarchs and simply never found. I think the only reference they get in the HH series is that bit showing the creation of all the Primarchs - they're certainly never spoken of by any of the other Primarchs or legions.
    They're mentioned abit, just not by name. Pretty sure its implied that the ultramarines absorbed quite a bit of one of the missing legions.

    Quote Originally Posted by prowla View Post
    By the way, there's a bit in A Thousand Sons where Ahriman sees a strong glimpse of future, and one part of it are "Ravens of Blood". Not to mention Ahriman's fellowship is The Corvidae and their symbol a black raven's head.

    There's been a lot of mentions in HH series about the two missing legions. Maybe they'll get themselves written, one day
    I highly doubt it, the missing legions are interesting because we know nothing about them. Combine that with all the existing fractions that people want more stories about and I don't see them being expanded any time soon.

  5. #45
    Chaplain The Red Pilgrim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    The Eye of Terror
    Posts
    284

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by althathir View Post
    They're mentioned abit, just not by name. Pretty sure its implied that the ultramarines absorbed quite a bit of one of the missing legions.
    That's an in-universe rumor; It's not true. Or at least it's not according to the author - Aaron Dembski-Bowden.
    Quote Originally Posted by Betrayer Extract View Post
    Kharn was killing the jerks in slow-motion, and Fire It Up by Black Label Society started playing, and **** was so cash.
    Quote Originally Posted by Aaron Dembski-Bowden View Post
    Lorgar laughed. He laughed like a winner. “This is why I don’t have tabletop rules, man. Because I’m H to the Ardcore.”

  6. #46
    Better than you Lothlanathorian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Solving Robot Ham's problems.
    Posts
    4,254

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by Idaan View Post
    Well, the totalitarian state that is the modern Imperium needs to create a public enemy for the populace to oppose. It needs Chaos Traitors to exist, even if they don't.

    The only issue I have with this is that under the older fluff, the Imperium's general populace didn't know about Chaos Marines, the Horus Heresy or Chaos. The =][= hunted down and would annihilate whole civilizations to wipe out a Cult, Space Marines were mind wiped after fighting daemons and whole populations/IG forces were either put to death or rendered infertile and stuck in labor camps and worked to death if they had knowledge of The Great Enemy. This was one of the big points over the First War for Armageddon. The =][= did this to Imperial citizens and Logan Grimnar almost started a small war over that fact.

    In modern fluff, though, it seems things aren't nearly quite so...serious.
    ...............................This is a link to the Forum Rules.,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,A Tale of Guilders plog
    Quote Originally Posted by salty View Post
    You people make baby Batman cry. And by cry, I mean punch people in the crotch. Because Batman doesn't cry. Ever. Not even baby Batman.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mannimarco View Post
    Arrogant egotistical insane sadomasochists do not make good team players.

  7. #47
    Get a tustom citle 'ere! blackcherry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Cheltenham
    Posts
    1,729

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    I think thats something that started in BL books from the early 2000s onwards(the first word bearers novel for example, has basic pdf troopers having full knowledge of the traitor legions) and has leaked sideways into the design studio. Its a bit of a disconnect from the old fluff for me, but it seems to have kept to the BL section for the most part. I think the toning down of the punishments for encountering chaos more to do with the universe becoming a bit more black and white. Can't have the good guys doing things bad guys do. That makes them morally questionable .
    Quote Originally Posted by On the subject of Jervis Johnson.
    That's not to say I wouldn't drive up onto the curb and run him over with my car if I ever saw him walking down a street regardless
    ^This is why parts of GW may not like the internet^

    I have a plog now! Now with actual painted models

  8. #48

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Killing troops exposed to chaos wasn't punishment, it was insurance. The Imperium believes allowing such people to live causes an unacceptable risk of daemonic insurrection.
    Sent from my Astropath using Tele Talk

  9. #49
    Commander Phunting's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    791

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by blackcherry View Post
    I think the toning down of the punishments for encountering chaos more to do with the universe becoming a bit more black and white. Can't have the good guys doing things bad guys do. That makes them morally questionable .
    As much as I hate to disagree with some good old 'it was better in my day' logic, I don't really see it. The Imperium is still constantly morally questionable, this has been reinforced time and time again. The 'exterminate everything' policy was, to be fair, a bit silly and utterly impractical. The idea that the Imperium was continually exterminating planets, guard regiments, even marine chapters due to chaos contact is an utterly unsustainable position; all GW have done in toning this down is make Imperial policy a little less simplistic which, IMHO, makes them less, not more, black and white.

  10. #50
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    587

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Agreed with the above. The Imperium is huge, but obliterating any and all forces that came into contact with Chaos is unsustainable.

    As for black and white... I really think that you would be hard pressed to justify calling any faction in 40k cut and dry 'good' or 'evil' with an unbiased, objective viewpoint.
    Quote Originally Posted by Azazyll View Post
    I've been wanting a fighter mage for years, and what we get is a model whose tripping over his feat trying to catch an octopus.
    elves in the snow
    a blog of Wood Elves and Warhammer

  11. #51

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by MyNameDidntFit View Post
    I really think that you would be hard pressed to justify calling any faction in 40k cut and dry 'good' or 'evil' with an unbiased, objective viewpoint.
    What could you possibly call "good" about Chaos?

  12. #52
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    587

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    I never said all factions were 'good', rather that they are not fitted to cookie-cutter moulds of black and white perceptions. Chaos is perpetually scheming to further itself at the cost of all others, but of which faction can you honestly say this is not true?

    By the standard upheld in the grim darkness of the far future, Chaos is no more evil than the Imperium--seeking it's own survival and the destruction of all others, no matter the cost to the galaxy at large.
    Quote Originally Posted by Azazyll View Post
    I've been wanting a fighter mage for years, and what we get is a model whose tripping over his feat trying to catch an octopus.
    elves in the snow
    a blog of Wood Elves and Warhammer

  13. #53

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by randian View Post
    What could you possibly call "good" about Chaos?
    Freedom from the totalitarian, tyrannical Imperium of Man? The power to make your own destiny, rather than be shackled to your birth-world in an existance of pure tedium? The power to strike back at the universe, rather than meekly accept your fate?
    Quote Originally Posted by Imperialis_Dominatus View Post
    And anytime you think to yourself, "no one could be that stupid/lacking in common sense/unreasonable/etc."... tell yourself, very loudly, "I AM WRONG," and slap yourself in the face. Hard. Because you are wrong. Because someone out there is, in fact, that stupid, unreasonable, lacking in common sense, etc. I assure you.

  14. #54

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by shadowhawk2008 View Post
    Gav Thorpe made it quite clear at BLL during the HH seminar that the HH authors will not be talking about the lost primarchs period, as in offering any revelations or anything. This was due to the fact that the hints so far (ATS, TFH, Rebirth) have been pretty heavy-handed and there is a danger of ruining the charm of the whole idea. The other panelists pretty much nodded :-)
    Thank goodness for that
    Quote Originally Posted by Baaltor View Post
    Selfishness and evil don't make a chaos space marine, they didn't turn to chaos because they decided stapling babies to their heads was cool.
    Proud fluffbunny - Playing 40k for 17 years (not in one sitting)

  15. #55

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by StraightSilver View Post
    I guess that's down to interpretation, I took as as much confirmation as was needed.

    The fact that he has red power armour with a raven's head on the shoulder pad searching for lost arcane items and swears to form a brotherhood of fellow TS marines and that their watch words would be "knowledge is power" was as good as saying "we will now be called the Blood Ravens".

    But ok, it doesn't explicitly say that, but I didn't feel it needed to.
    If that's what it says that is pretty much explicit isn't it lol
    Quote Originally Posted by Baaltor View Post
    Selfishness and evil don't make a chaos space marine, they didn't turn to chaos because they decided stapling babies to their heads was cool.
    Proud fluffbunny - Playing 40k for 17 years (not in one sitting)

  16. #56
    Commander Phunting's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    London
    Posts
    791

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by randian View Post
    What could you possibly call "good" about Chaos?
    As others have said, it's not about chaos as 'good', but just a different shade of grey. I acknowledge that unfortunately quite a few writers paint chaos as a one dimensional spiky cliche, but if we're talking about changes over time I'd say modern writers in showing sympathetic falling to chaos in the HH and in Black Crusade have done more than ever before to bring depth to the stereotype.

    Indeed most of the pre-Imperial 'chaotic' societies we've seen in the HH (Sarosh [from DofA], Colchis, and possibly Cadia spring to mind) seem much more stable and less oppressive than the Imperium does. I would suggest that a case could be made that it is Imperial dogma that makes chaos as nasty as it appears, not chaos itself. All of the worst chaotic societies we see are, after all post-Imperial. The organically grown chaos societies generally seem much more moderate.

    The rebel governors who are used to a society of brutalism and subjugation within the Imperium may well start skinning people alive as soon as they are given the freedom of chaos. But is this due to chaos itself, or is it analogous to keeping someone imprisoned and subjected to brutal violence their entire lives and then when they reciprocate violent acts upon gaining freedom, claiming 'you see, we should never give people freedom' as the answer?

  17. #57

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    It's probally because Slaanesh quite likes the idea of skinning people alive and thinks that you should give it a try to see how it feels.

    Although Khorne would be outraged at the waste of killing time and Tzeetch would say "what skin?". So they aren't all bad.

  18. #58

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    I was under the understanding that Blood ravens were from the Word Bearers from Dawn of War: Dark Crusade or at least they knew the origins of the Blood ravens.

    Thousand sons sounds about right though.

    EDIT:
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord-Caerolion View Post
    Freedom from the totalitarian, tyrannical Imperium of Man? The power to make your own destiny, rather than be shackled to your birth-world in an existance of pure tedium? The power to strike back at the universe, rather than meekly accept your fate?
    Also you have to remember all they have heard or seen is imperial propaganda and stories of great brutal psychopaths so when they go rogue i would speculate that with the new freedom their psyche attributes the brutalism and appalling acts of torture and grotesque things as being "Chaos" so they may carry it out in what they believe is "Worshiping the chaos gods".

    Organic Chaos societies may have festivals like the old celtic festival(for got its name) where men and woman were free from marriage and have intercourse with any one they wished and if the woman fell pregnant it would be the married couple's child. That would be considered worshiping Slaanesh. Just as Ritual combat between warriors for positions of 'head of the hunt' or something similar. Nurgle could be asking for deliverance from sickness of family members so they sacrifice animals and array them in "Beautiful" shrines.
    Last edited by @Nyxium; 08-04-2012 at 21:18.

  19. #59
    Librarian The Warmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Tasmania, Australia
    Posts
    455

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by Chem-Dog View Post
    It's not quite as black and white, the Blood Ravens' inception was something that took place somewhere round Late M36/Early M37.
    Not necessarily. Their records only go back that far (it's been said that almost all their records from before then have been destroyed). The chapter itself seems to be aware that its founding was earlier.

    I seem to remember a reference to them operating as far back as M32, perhaps in a discussion of one of the DoW books? (I've only read extracts, so I can't comment on the books themselves.)

    Quote Originally Posted by The Red Pilgrim View Post
    That's an in-universe rumor; It's not true. Or at least it's not according to the author - Aaron Dembski-Bowden.
    Like the Blood Ravens being founded from the TS, I thought Aaron said that the Ultras assimilating the lost Legions is just, as far as we can tell, a rumour, but didn't actually give a definitive answer either way. As for both them and the Blood Ravens-TS link, a lot of people seem to think his own doubts about the truth of these two claims are Word of God, which he has denied.
    Last edited by The Warmaster; 10-04-2012 at 06:06.
    Quote Originally Posted by atomictophat View Post
    "Hey, you got Warp Virus in my Mad Techpriest!"

    "You got Mad Techpriest in my Warp Virus!"

    "Now you can have both with new Obliterators!"
    Rap music may be bad, but many metalheads have a tendency to be judgmental and elitist. I should know - I am one.

  20. #60

    Re: Is GW hinting at a new Primarch with the Blood Ravens?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Warmaster View Post
    I thought Aaron said that the Ultras assimilating the lost Legions is just, as far as we can tell, a rumour, but didn't actually give a definitive answer either way.
    No, he was specific, he stated that if he knew people would take it as truth rather than malicious rumour, he wouldn't have included the lines. The Ultramarines never absorbed any Lost Legionnaires. Their large numbers were solely due to their recruitment practices, nothing more.
    Quote Originally Posted by Imperialis_Dominatus View Post
    And anytime you think to yourself, "no one could be that stupid/lacking in common sense/unreasonable/etc."... tell yourself, very loudly, "I AM WRONG," and slap yourself in the face. Hard. Because you are wrong. Because someone out there is, in fact, that stupid, unreasonable, lacking in common sense, etc. I assure you.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •