Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 91

Thread: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

  1. #1
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    822

    Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    OK, so quick heads up, this will be a long post. I'm hearing a lot of chatter about "Inner Circle Squads", "Plasma Predators", "Jetbike Units" and such in wishlisting threads for the new Dark Angel codex (which we've heard naff all about).

    So far, gathering rumours, we have the following;
    - Dark Angels and Chaos will be in the starter box for 6th
    - Dark Angels may, or may not be a Chaplain heavy chapter, with specific chaplain units offering bonuses like Sang. Priests or Wolf Guard.
    There is nothing else. GWs new rumour policy has hit us all. No confirmation that anyone is working on a Dark Angels book.

    Now. As far as the fluff goes, the Dark Angels are a Codex Adherent Chapter with the exception of the Deathwing and the Ravenwing.

    The Vanilla Space Marine book, though showing its age compared to Grey Knights and some of the newer books is still a competitive book (if only at tier 2) and is capable of a wide variety of armies.

    So, given GW's predeliction with releasing a Marine codex very close to a new edition release, to capitalise on "Little Timmy" wanting to be an 8ft tall superwarrior, it is a fair bet that both Chaos Legions and a marine codex of some description will come out just before or just after 6th edition hits. As Dark Angels are confirmed in the box set, this would mean the aforementioned Marine codex should be Dark Angels.

    Or would it?
    For a stand alone Dark Angels codex to be viable, there needs to be significant divergence from the current regular Space Marine codex or any one in the future. Ravenwing will need to be comparable power wise with White Scar bike armies (they currently aren't) and the tactical marines would have to be significantly different to justify a Dark Angels "Greenwing". This divergence brings with it complexity.

    Complexity is the issue. At first glance, Codex: Space Marines is a simple book. Tactical Squads at its core, battle company ethos. ATSKNF makes them more forgiving, combat tactics looks like a nice trick. The basic building blocks of the game are in this book, because they have to be. Most new players of the young variety will be picking Space Marines. As you know more about the game, then you can squeeze the power out of the book with Vulkan, Shrike and Khan, avoiding some of the more underpowered units in competitive play.

    A Dark Angels codex that is divergent enough to justify its own existence will not be like this, so it makes little sense for GW to put this up as the poster boy.

    [EDIT] By poster boy, I mean the chapter that gets "the push". In the box set, on the starter set of paints etc.

    It also means the following;
    - Black Templars, Space Wolves, Blood Angels, Dark Angels, Vanilla Marines
    - Imperial Guard, Tau, Orks, Eldar, Dark Eldar, Tyranids, Necrons, Daemons, Chaos Space Marines
    - Grey Knights
    - Sister of Battle

    16 factions. Given the design time needed on a book is upwards of 6 months (closer to 12 is my guess), your factions get updated less often, their models go through peaks and troughs of sales. This is ignoring any development on WHFB.

    Rolling the Dark Angels into the Vanilla Space Marine book frees up design time. That means better (and more regular) Xenos updates. Which means Space Marine players have a reason to buy another army, rather than just another codex. While the Space Marine line is hugely profitable and units go across the books, having players invest in another faction with guarenteed more regular updates would go a long way to GW developing a cross sell strategy.

    So how difficult would it be for Dark Angels to be incorporated into the current incarnation of Vanilla Marines? Well;
    - Tactical squads, predators, dreadnoughts, assault marines, librarians, masters (captains), devestators, land raiders, vindicators, whirlwinds, land speeders and scouts all get a straight port across (with the requisite points and options adjustments)
    - company veterans become sternguard or vanguard, respectively
    - Sammael is added as a special character with his jetbike or land speeder. He replaces combat tactics with scout.
    - Belial goes straight across. He replaces combat tactics with fearless and allowing terminator squads as troops (he gets a points bump)
    - Terminator squads no longer split into assault and tactical. The terminator squad costs X points (less than 200) for 5 terminators equipped with 4 powerfists, 1 power sword and 5 storm bolters. Upgrade to chainfist for 5 points per model. Upgrade to lightning claws for 5 points per model, upgrade to THSS for 10 points per model. Cyclone missile launcher, assault cannon and heavy flamer stay the same price. In this way, your THSS equiped squad is going to cost you more than it does now (and should appease some of the moaners), but you gain tactical flexibility. And if you want a mixed squad, you have to buy 2 kits (bonus for GW)
    - Ravenwing no longer exist. They are absorbed into the bike squad entry.
    - maybe room for a third DA special character, as we are the poster boys (Ezekiel or Azrael) who grant Stubborn in place of combat tactics, or in addition. Lose a couple of the lesser played UM SC - sicarius, the librarian. I'd keep Khan, but he may go also.

    So you get a codex with deathwing, a better ravenwing, can still build an army based on tactical marines thats effective and you don't affect the current space marine codex in a horrendous way.

    I appreciate everyone wants to be a unique flower, but when looking at the constraints on the design team already (who have to balance 16 factions in 40k and however many else in Fantasy), it makes sense from a business perspective and for the good of the game system to roll Dark Angels into the new Space Marine codex.

    [EDIT] Seeing as a lot of replies have been SOLELY related to my pointing out of the weaknesses of the Dark Angels book, I've removed it. It's not relevant to the argument.
    Last edited by ErictheGreen; 21-03-2012 at 17:20.

  2. #2

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    It wouldn't make sense for them to be the "poster boys". The DA are not the UM and the UM are the greatest chapter. Every chapter aspires to be them but they never will be because they are not UM.

  3. #3
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    822

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Obvious troll is obvious.

    Some feedback on the material in the OP would be appreciated.

  4. #4
    Chapter Master Bunnahabhain's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Edinburgh
    Posts
    11,959

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    No reason they wouldn't stay the poster boys. They're loyalist marines, so they already are.

    They're codex adherent, so spare them the harrowing of the background the current lead author of marine codices (I shall not speak his name) does so well, call them a codex chapter, and put them in the marine book.
    Occasionally accused of being helpful and constructive.
    One ring Book to rule them all, one ring place to find them, One ring Codex to bring them all, and in the Darkness future bind them. Time for the unified Marine Codex.

  5. #5
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    822

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    By "poster boy" I mean, they're in the 6th edition box set, the new starter paint set has dark angels rahter than ultramarines and so on.

    They are the marine army that gets the new player push.

    But no disagreements, Bunn. I shudder to think of what certain individuals will do to the Fallen fluff. Sisters of Battle will be butchered somewhere, for certainty.

  6. #6
    Veteran Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North East UK
    Posts
    84

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    agree that the Dark Angels will not become the poster boys for 40k the Ultarmarines have always had that honour as far as i know.
    how do you mean that CSM is showing its age,ive played against all the newer armys and have won more games than lost,with a pretty generic army that i take.
    Tactical Squads don't suck

  7. #7
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Canada Usually, South Korea Currently
    Posts
    1,567

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    to be honest, BAs weren't all that different from codex marines until more recently... and even now, the only real difference is the chapter specific units (SG and DC). The DC is old school, but the rest is pretty new. SW have also had different units, all though, for a very long time, and they gained a some new ones in their 5th upgrade. Ultras have also had many upgrades and new stuff added to them over 5th, namely the TFcannon, LSS, and ICDs.

    DAs haven't gotten any love over 5th edition. So I need to say to those who keep posting that the DAs are a codex chapter with the exception of this and that: The DAs unlike the rest of the SM books, have not gotten any of that 5th edition love that other SMs have got (each gaining at least 1 new, unheard of unit). Once the DAs get their turn in the upgrade schedule, I'm sure we'll see a greater divergence, with a couple more special chapter specific units, just like all the others have recently received.

  8. #8
    Chapter Master Sureshot05's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Croydon, London, UK
    Posts
    1,137

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Grit View Post
    agree that the Dark Angels will not become the poster boys for 40k the Ultarmarines have always had that honour as far as i know.
    how do you mean that CSM is showing its age,ive played against all the newer armys and have won more games than lost,with a pretty generic army that i take.
    Not true, just the last two.

    2nd Ed: Blood Angels
    3rd Ed: Black templar
    4 & 5th : Ultramarines

    I think GW has seen that the recent marine releases show that they don't need to focus on UM to be guarenteed marine sales.

    I think Dark Angels would make great poster boys.
    - have an interesting back story.
    - have several viable styles of play for one codex
    - compatible with all the marine range
    - gothic and photogenic marines.

    The greatest weakness with DA as poster boys is the "Hunt the fallen" focus that has pervaded their background. Whilst a key part of the DA, it neglects their other roles in defending the Imperium (and reduces the likelihood of them fighting, say, the tau).

    I also think that if they manage to make the Dark angel models with the sort of quality we've seen in space hulk then it will be an excellent starter.
    Warhammer Armies: Empire, Night Goblins, Dwarves, Daemons of Chaos
    40K Armies: Chaos, Imperial Guard, Ultramarines, Chaos Daemons, Tyranids, Tau
    Epic Armies: Imperial Guard, Ultramarines, Orks, Adeptus Titanicus.
    BFG Forces: Imperial Navy, Chaos.
    See them all here: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...-of-everything

  9. #9
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    822

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    In terms of the highest levels of competitive play (NOVA, for example), Codex: Space Marines is good, but not top tier. You can still be a bad player with a BA/GK/SW book (not that I'm saying all your opponents are bad, Grit).

    It has aged very well when you compare it to the likes of Tyranids and Orks, whose appearance on the top tables is becoming more of a rarity.

    This isn't to discuss the relative power level of the marine books though, this is purely about making a smart business decision - incorporating a faction into another (because they are essentially the same), to get more design time for more neglected books.

    Grit: ultramarines were in the Macragge box and the black reach box. They appear on the start paint set. Codex: Space Marines is really Codex: Ultramarines and cameo friends from other chapters. That's what made them poster boys, the push GW made for them to be the army new players picked up. If Dark Angels are in the 6th edition set and the new paint set, logically, they are the ones that will get that same push.

  10. #10
    Veteran Sergeant
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    North East UK
    Posts
    84

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by ErictheGreen View Post
    In terms of the highest levels of competitive play (NOVA, for example), Codex: Space Marines is good, but not top tier. You can still be a bad player with a BA/GK/SW book (not that I'm saying all your opponents are bad, Grit).

    It has aged very well when you compare it to the likes of Tyranids and Orks, whose appearance on the top tables is becoming more of a rarity.

    This isn't to discuss the relative power level of the marine books though, this is purely about making a smart business decision - incorporating a faction into another (because they are essentially the same), to get more design time for more neglected books.

    Grit: ultramarines were in the Macragge box and the black reach box. They appear on the start paint set. Codex: Space Marines is really Codex: Ultramarines and cameo friends from other chapters. That's what made them poster boys, the push GW made for them to be the army new players picked up. If Dark Angels are in the 6th edition set and the new paint set, logically, they are the ones that will get that same push.
    Agree there that you can be a bad player with a good dex. but generaly I do pretty well because i take alot of thigs people dont't rate and get confused as what to go for first,just the way I play. I always try to build a pretty balacned list with a certain plan in mind for all my units. Was talking to a friend about the army I take and he is confused as to why i do so well with it.

    I started 40k just as 3rd edition was coming to a close so didn't buy the starter box set so wasnt sure about who was fanboys at the time.
    I supose going by the whats in the new box set could be right about the new poseter boys. I just dislike the Dark Angels,could because my first marine army was Space Wolves who knows eh!

    My current list that have been using and thinking of taking to a local tournament http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...cal-Tournament
    Last edited by Grit; 21-03-2012 at 12:08.
    Tactical Squads don't suck

  11. #11

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Well Dark Angels are the Grim/Dark chapter of the loyalists which seems to be the way GW are taking the overall 40k universe further and further with each edition. To be honest if the background gets any more Grim/Dark the books will have to start carrying health warnings that you dont overdose on it.

  12. #12
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    822

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Beppo1234 View Post
    to be honest, BAs weren't all that different from codex marines until more recently... and even now, the only real difference is the chapter specific units (SG and DC). The DC is old school, but the rest is pretty new. SW have also had different units, all though, for a very long time, and they gained a some new ones in their 5th upgrade. Ultras have also had many upgrades and new stuff added to them over 5th, namely the TFcannon, LSS, and ICDs.

    DAs haven't gotten any love over 5th edition. So I need to say to those who keep posting that the DAs are a codex chapter with the exception of this and that: The DAs unlike the rest of the SM books, have not gotten any of that 5th edition love that other SMs have got (each gaining at least 1 new, unheard of unit). Once the DAs get their turn in the upgrade schedule, I'm sure we'll see a greater divergence, with a couple more special chapter specific units, just like all the others have recently received.
    The fluff for the blood angels has always been divergent - they prefer jump pack assault based tactics and they have the blood thing going on.

    The Dark Angels, bar the ravenwing (biggest divergence) and having enough suits of TDA to kit out the entirety of the first company have never been a particularly divergent chapter. They have the Fallen fluff and the inner circle, but that doesn't impact on battle organisation where they have largely been codex astartes adherent (aside from the randomly buggering off from battle thing).

    The point of the post is that it would not be a bad thing, for the game, for dark angels players or for GW as a business, for Dark Angels to be rolled into a unified space marine codex.

  13. #13
    Marine
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    plymouth UK
    Posts
    9

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    I just wish workshop did rules and codecs for free in form of downloads, and released stuff in the same way as privateer press, that way there would be more rules balance and always something for a player to buy.

  14. #14
    Marine Commitz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Northern Ireland
    Posts
    17

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Grit View Post
    agree that the Dark Angels will not become the poster boys for 40k the Ultarmarines have always had that honour as far as i know.
    how do you mean that CSM is showing its age,ive played against all the newer armys and have won more games than lost,with a pretty generic army that i take.
    Crimson Fists (Rogue Trader), Blood Angels (Second Edition), Black Templars (Third Edition) were the faces on the Warhammer 40k rulebooks/boxsets. Ultramarines have always featured fairly prominently in Space Marine stuff in general though.

    I'd be chuffed to see the Dark Angels on the cover of Sixth. They've been my favourite chapter since I got in to the game, and they provide a number of nice options to play with.

  15. #15

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Bunnahabhain View Post
    them a codex chapter, and put them in the marine book.
    I agree! DA use all the same kits that CSM use, and are not that divergent. Roll them into the marine book, keep their special characters and their rules for the wing detachments and call it a day. 1 less book to be outdated and would increase the DA playerbase.

  16. #16
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Southern New England (Formerly UK)
    Posts
    2,100

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Chaos Undecided View Post
    Well Dark Angels are the Grim/Dark chapter of the loyalists which seems to be the way GW are taking the overall 40k universe further and further with each edition. To be honest if the background gets any more Grim/Dark the books will have to start carrying health warnings that you dont overdose on it.
    Are you kidding me? It's the happiest it's ever been, with good guys smashing or allying with bad guys and all violence stripped off the books like a vulture picked it from the bones of the game's carcass in the desert. They've even changed the names of many moves to be more friendly and palatable.

    I think the Dark Angels pose a very simple fix, if you ask me: Terminators and Bikers are troops as standard. That would be pretty unique, yet still allow them to field a force that is similar in composition to a normal marine battle company force. In Elites and FA you could have "Veteran" versions of every unit that are better.

    The Dark Angels are the 1st Legion and I think that is rarely explored. They also do very little to explore or elaborate on the Fallen thing in game, and I could see a lot of cool stuff being done with this. The book, from what I have heard, will include the ability to field a force of Fallen.
    40k Supplements, Add-Ons & Events:
    [Campaign Special Character Pack] - [Dyer's Eve - 40k Zombie Apocalypse]
    More Coming Soon
    Quote Originally Posted by A.T.
    Special Rule - My Army
    If there are no units that I don't want to use in the army, the units I want to make more powerful may take what I want to have for free. In addition, everything else gets something else I want free too.

  17. #17
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    822

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Chapters Unwritten View Post
    The Dark Angels are the 1st Legion and I think that is rarely explored. They also do very little to explore or elaborate on the Fallen thing in game, and I could see a lot of cool stuff being done with this. The book, from what I have heard, will include the ability to field a force of Fallen.
    Heard? or read a wishlist? GW won't go that way.

    You might get a decent Fallen army from the Chaos book, though. They are rumoured to have cultists and renegades back, which would be nice.

  18. #18
    Chapter Master dean's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    misery... er Missouri, US
    Posts
    1,370

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Chapters Unwritten View Post
    The book, from what I have heard, will include the ability to field a force of Fallen.
    Quote Originally Posted by ErictheGreen View Post
    Heard? or read a wishlist? GW won't go that way.

    You might get a decent Fallen army from the Chaos book, though. They are rumoured to have cultists and renegades back, which would be nice.
    Way to missquote there shooley, I believe that this is how Eric's post should read. /\
    And he isnt a kid, I've watched him post in the Deathwing Tactica long enough to know.

    The truth is that we havent had the 5th ed treatment and yes everything new and fancy we did get was given to every new book after us thus negating our uniqueness. There will likely be a green codex and it will have unique stuff. Beyond that this entire thread needs to take a "wait and see".
    Quote Originally Posted by TheShadowGuard
    On wings of death they shall ride, to unleash hell and fury from above
    Sons of Johnson shall roll like a tide, in memory of the father and the lord they love
    Ammobunker Plog: "dean's somewhat less rarely updated log" (Deathwing, Cadian and Il-Kaithe)
    Warseer Plog:"dean's rarely updated plog"
    What's that GW? More Dark Angels?... Well if you insist.... (A 2nd battle company started...) What? Chaos resurgent and in the box too? (Long, long delayed 1ksons started)

  19. #19

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    So you're saying that because the Dark Angels codex was poorly made they should be axed as a stand alone army. Geez, there should be some kind of approval systems for gamers who play a particular army to avoid this conclusion. "Yeah yeah yeah, we know Dark Angels have been around for DECADES, but sorry guys, we screwed up, made their codex a little weaker than is balanced, so.... 'SQUATTED!'". The only thing that makes the current DA dex seem like it offers nothing new is because every other marine codex has stolen their unique rules over the years, and Jervis Johnson is an extremely conservative army designer (to a fault imo). I've played DA for 12+ years, the last thing anyone should advocate is GW getting rid of an army, simply because you "feel like they should be a vanilla chapter".
    I'm not opposed to reorganizing the space marine codexes in a way that you reduce the number to 3 general templates (Codex, Crusade, Divergent/Heretical), but I'll be damned if GW is going to axe a RT era codex simply because they got a bad deal this edition. Your argument that developing DA cuts into time for other armies is flawed, the Dark Angels are one of the oldest books in this edition, so they haven't been taking up any design time thanks to having been largely ignored.

    Perhaps if we all demanded that GW release a new edition and new codex books simultaneously we might get more balanced match ups, and more support for the hobby beyond "here look i haz new book dat beats all da old books!"

  20. #20
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    822

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    awwww.....shucks Dean.

    I wouldn't be opposed to a Green codex, by any means. It would have to differentiate us enough from Codex Marines for it to be viable, otherwise the book gets the same treatment it does now - it's a Deathwing codex.

    My argument was simply that, given the fluff and the physical restraints on the teams producing the material, it's not a huge leap, nor a bad decision to look at dark angels in the codex marine book.

    This thread has, I think, gone off on a couple of tangents.


    @Shooley; that's not my argument at all. Hell, Crimson Fists have been around since RT and they've never got their own codex. For that matter, so have Imperial Fists. Why? Because they follow the same battle doctrine as all the other codex adherent chapters. Screw the Wardian fluff about spiritual lieges, the Codex Astrates has been around in the game for ages. One of the old Space Marine books (3rd? 4th?) had a traits system that used to deal with slightly divergent chapters. No reason it can't be like that again (without the ridiculous lasplas crap).

    And my argument about development time is not flawed. It is precisely because Dark Angels haven't had an update in years that it will cut into development time of other codexes. When Tau, Orks, Nids and Eldar are desperately in need of an update as well. It is precisely because development time has been spent on Space Wolves, Blood Angels and Grey Knights that we have a multitude of power armour dexes. Cutting it by one increases development time available for ALL books. If you can't do the math on that, I don't know what to say.

    And I'm not arguing to squat them, either. I'm a Dark Angels player. I'm currently on the (very painful) path to trying to make regular Dark Angels work without resorting to multiple Deathwing Squads. You put Deathwing and Ravenwing armies into the Codex Marine book and you have exactly the same book for Dark Angels, but better. It's a win for everyone. I don't "feel" like they are a codex chapter. They are a codex chapter, bar the first and second companies. Spinning that out into a new book is not necessary.
    Last edited by ErictheGreen; 21-03-2012 at 15:25.

Page 1 of 5 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •