Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 91

Thread: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

  1. #41

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    I'm emphatically against the DA codex being "rolled in" to vanilla. For one, we tend to get the codex that sets the standard for the later vanilla codex; not the other way around. We tend to pioneer the stuff that gets a revision and incorporation for the vanilla dex; plasma cannons being one example. We could fairly be called the space marine test chapter.

    Additionally, the Dark Angels have some meticulously crafted, very entertaining backstory. I never consider that sort of thing expendable. I refuse to even call it "fluff" because that implies that it just isn't important, that I shouldn't care whether I'm running dark angels or a pack of seahorses, as long as my statline is my focus. I never signed on for a statline. The DA won me over hook line and sinker because their backstory struck a chord with me, and I would never want to shortchange the depth of their background for anything. (I do worry about its incarnation in the next codex...)

    We deserve our own codex because we're not clones of those other chapters. My deathwing don't operate closely enough to vanilla terminators to be rolled in, and putting in a special sidebar of "if you're dark angels, THIS applies instead" for the DW, the ravenwing, the interrogator chaplains, et all would be wasteful. Why dilute a chapter that has so much character and individual definition like that? I know more Dark Angel players locally than I do for any other chapter, so there's business sense in keeping us apart. That's codex sales right there alone.

    As for using the same models, we also have our own. Ravenwing bike squad, Dark Angels veteran sergeants, DA company masters and so on. If we're to say "you use the same models" we could safely ignore every SM codex ever written in favor of one vanilla dex and I doubt you'll find many blood angels or space wolf players willing to sacrifice their dex taht way.

    Keep us separate. Just update us, for the Emperor's sake. I find little fault with the current DA dex but yeah, it definitely needs a shot in the arm. We're almost two editions behind now. But keep it separate. Keep the Dark Angels the Dark Angels.

  2. #42

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    If they roll DA into the vanilla codex then I'd like to see BA, SW, BT etc all rolled into the codex too. If they can be bothered to give BA all their special rules this time around then they can give DA some as well. It only needs a few bits, doesn't even need to be overkill like BA/SW for most people to be happy. The only people who want DA to be destroyed are those who either play BA/SW/GK or xenos players.

    As for not enough Xenos players, well that's because most people who play the game appear to think it's a sport and so must win at all costs (que BA, SW, GK players etc etc). If more people actually played to the fluff and played the force that they actually enjoyed you may find more people playing xenos armies.. Of course you may not and people may enjoy Long fangs, assault marines with priests running about counting as troops and dropping pretty much on the spot every time etc etc
    Last edited by Cricket1982; 21-03-2012 at 20:05.

  3. #43

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    its only a thought

  4. #44
    Chapter Master Promethius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Kernow, UK
    Posts
    1,528

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Saboreth View Post
    We deserve our own codex because we're not clones of those other chapters. My deathwing don't operate closely enough to vanilla terminators to be rolled in, and putting in a special sidebar of "if you're dark angels, THIS applies instead" for the DW, the ravenwing, the interrogator chaplains, et all would be wasteful. Why dilute a chapter that has so much character and individual definition like that?
    The same logic applies to lots of chapters that don't have codexes though. Iron hands have dreadnoughts as company commanders. The white scars are almost all mounted troops in one way or another. The Imperial Fists fight to the death rather than surrender. These are not 'clone' chapters. All of these are rolled into the vanilla codex, along with many other examples which are characterful and unique in their own way. As it stands there is no reason why Dark Angels can't do the same. What I would like to see is a more balanced marine book with several pages of fluff on all of the major chapters included, and enough characters to make a fluffy list for a selection of different chapters. It makes much more sense from a development perspective to have less books to update rather than try to think of new unique units for each one. Eldar don't get books for different craftworlds, Tau don't get books for different septs, in fact they wait their turn for updating in favour of marine books with different coloured power armour.
    Quote Originally Posted by Splagbot
    I personally don't like Tau because of the way they look, every thing looks like it's been designed by a child in some sort of Blue Peter competition.
    The Kilifreth trip.

    http://www.28dayslater.co.uk/forums/...ad.php?t=47459

  5. #45

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    As a new 40k player who plays DA I would only accept DA being rolled into the marine codex IF they also rolled the rest of the marines into it. If BA, SW deserve their own codex then the first legion do too. I probably would not have taken up the hobby (yes hobby!! it's not a sport!) if it wasn't for the DA. I can't stand SW/BA as everyone who plays them are basically only interested in winning and not actually playing for fun. Like I've said before, if people just took the hit about winning all the time and played to the fluff then you would see loads more variety pretty quickly.

    TBH, when I see any marine force that's not mainly made up of tactical marines then the player is playing against their fluff as tacticals are supposed to be the backbone of the army.. not just something you have to put up with.

  6. #46
    Chapter Master carlisimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Fremont, CA
    Posts
    1,312

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    It’s like the OP was talking to people who were holding their hands up to their ears.

    There are three things that could happen to the Dark Angels and Black Templars:

    1. BA/SW/GK treatment: unique codex, new units, lots of development time.
    2. Roll into SM codex, which keeps the special characters and force org manipulation but denies them unique units. Also takes much less development time.
    3. Current treatment: unique codex with nothing unique but the fluff (or if anything is unique, it won’t be after the next SM codex is released). Doesn’t really add development time because if anything new happens, it’ll save time spent developing the next SM book.

    If both of the old-codex chapters get the BA/SW/GK treatment, we xenos players are going to be increasingly vocal about drowning in marines. If you were on 40k-related forums 5 to 10 years ago, you’ll remember what it was like. It’ll be worse if they turn out to be top-tier. That would mean that pretty much all the recent Space Marine chapters are top-tier or close to it, and none of the xenos releases have been... so new players will gravitate towards MEQ armies more than frickin’ ever. I would be happy for the existing DA players, though.

    Option 2 would mean less fluff, unless the next SM codex is monstrously large. Given what recent fluff has been like, it might not be a bad thing. I don’t think the DA would lose anything besides that fluff. If you don’t like this option, you had better be able to argue that I’m wrong about that.

    Option 3 might happen if GW has extra resources to spend on new figures, but not on rules. The codex+model release would basically be filler in the schedule while they work on other stuff.

  7. #47

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Rolling the Dark Angels into the Space Marines codex would not result in any additional stuff for non-Marines.

    Marines don't dominate the release schedule because they have so many variant armies to support. Marines dominate the release schedule because Marines sell extremely well. You could roll all of the variant books into Codex Space Marines, and that book would be a million pages long, and Tau and Orks and Craftworld Eldar still wouldn't get any extra stuff. What you'd get instead would be more second and third waves of Marine models and more regular revisions of the codex book itself. Xenos don't get as much support as Marines because they don't sell as well, it's as simple as that.

  8. #48

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Chem-Dog View Post
    I honestly think we can expect to see a handful of "DA Only" units, Space Wolves get TWC, the "Wolf Pack" and WG Terminators, Blood Angels have The Sanguinary Guard, Death Company, Furioso Dreads and the Baal Predator it's reasonable to expect that there are some special units that only the DA's can have. Personally I hope for something a little more than New-Tank, Bespoke Bikes and Terminators.
    I'm sure you will, my point is that its desirable for GW to have some overlap, because it keeps the generic space marine kits going.

    Quote Originally Posted by Chem-Dog View Post
    I don't think any Space Marine Faction that's been around or as long as the Dark Angels is ever going to be a risk, people pick them up because they have retro appeal, because they represent the IN to somebody's hobby career and because they like the background.

    I'm sure they prefer it when people see the army and build a whole new army for it
    I don't think DA would be risk either but by having multiple marine fractions its even less of a risk for them, whereas most xenos releases have a lot more kits take nids people were wary of them even before they got released and the perception was that the faq killed them.

    I'm also sure they would like to see people build whole new armies, but honestly I think GW just wants to keep selling you models they don't care why (unless it help them sell more).

    Quote Originally Posted by soviet View Post
    Rolling the Dark Angels into the Space Marines codex would not result in any additional stuff for non-Marines.

    Marines don't dominate the release schedule because they have so many variant armies to support. Marines dominate the release schedule because Marines sell extremely well. You could roll all of the variant books into Codex Space Marines, and that book would be a million pages long, and Tau and Orks and Craftworld Eldar still wouldn't get any extra stuff. What you'd get instead would be more second and third waves of Marine models and more regular revisions of the codex book itself. Xenos don't get as much support as Marines because they don't sell as well, it's as simple as that.
    I agree, the one thing I think GW could that would affect xenos sales, would be making multiple starter sets because orks did build up quite a following with AoBR and the intial costs for 40k are fairly OTT.

  9. #49

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    And exactly how would you roll BT in with the vanilla?

    They have even less in common with the vanilla than DA do, and I would not be for rolling them into the main codex either.

    I would be all for them being the new 'poster boys', and some UM players would also be pleased to have the lime light taken off them.

  10. #50
    Chapter Master carlisimo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Fremont, CA
    Posts
    1,312

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by soviet View Post
    Xenos don't get as much support as Marines because they don't sell as well, it's as simple as that.
    Making all the top-tier armies Imperial has something to do with that!

  11. #51

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    DA will not get merged into Codex: SM. Won't happen. They will get the SW/BA treatment to make them more unique.
    Kitwise, I expect a 5 pack Deathwing Terminator kit, likely a Plasma Predator variant, likely the new SM not-stormraven flier, and maybe a mortis dreadnought kit. If plastic mini-spures, then probably an interrogator chaplain in that format.

    Posterboys, I can see it happening. Crimson Fists were 1st, then Blood Angels, then BT, then UM for two editions. I doubt they will change the packaging, but new marine kits will probably be painted as DA on the front.
    "As I've always said, Wes is wise." - Scryer in the Darkness
    "Wes, if you keep this up you'll need to change your name to MajorWiseJanson." - Azzy
    "Many boffins died to bring us this information." - Forgeworld Announcement E-mail
    "Rest assured, Servitor 13 has your best interests at heart. Now let's fire up the lascannons." - GW changes their web privacy policy.

  12. #52
    Commander Carlosophy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Sheffield, UK
    Posts
    699

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by ErictheGreen View Post
    See my previous post. I'm more than aware of the awesomeness that is the Dark Angels background. That background doesn't change if Dark Angels are part of a unified Marine dex. It's still there, it's still awesome.
    Raven Guard, White Scars and Imperial Fists have pretty awesome fluff as well and yet get relegated to a footnote and one character. I feel even sorrier for Iron Hands players. They have no character at all and their Primarch was the first to bit the bullet

  13. #53
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    795

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Carlosophy View Post
    Raven Guard, White Scars and Imperial Fists have pretty awesome fluff as well and yet get relegated to a footnote and one character. I feel even sorrier for Iron Hands players. They have no character at all and their Primarch was the first to bit the bullet
    Even more reason for Dark Angels to get rolled in. The Space Wolf and Blood Angel fluff had always been quite divergent in terms of organisation.

    It is short sighted to ride the marine wave to the point that other armies don't sell. It dilutes your game.

    I think part of the problem has also been 5th edition. If you see less protection for vehicles, you may see a drop off for marines as that rhino isn't just a great investment anymore (good, but not great). 5th edition is a good ruleset and with a few tweaks will be a very good ruleset.


    Quote Originally Posted by althathir View Post
    I'm also sure they would like to see people build whole new armies, but honestly I think GW just wants to keep selling you models they don't care why (unless it help them sell more).
    This is very accurate.

  14. #54
    Librarian Abaraxas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    337

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    I think something like the old angels of death codex book would suffice for all the "different" loyalist marines, and have the space marine codex too.

    With only 2 marine books they could get other factions brought up to speed faster.
    (why exactly things have to be "updated" has puzzled me since 2nd was updated to 3rd)

    Id be more than happy for the dark angels to be the poster boys, they are the first.


    Although I dont wish for them to get the dumbed down "update" treatment that the space wolves and blood angels have recieved (space wolves space marines riding thunderwolves, etc etc etc)- I wouldnt want them to now become "the jetbike guys", seems a Dark Angels army is usually Deathwing or Ravenwing anyway...ummm anyway I hope they do make them the poster boys and that that leads to rules and in particular miniatures for chaos cultists and what have you.

  15. #55
    Chapter Master Sir_Turalyon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Torun/Krakow, Poland
    Posts
    2,343

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by ErictheGreen View Post
    Even more reason for Dark Angels to get rolled in. The Space Wolf and Blood Angel fluff had always been quite divergent in terms of organisation.
    Actually, wrong. Blood Angels were always described and represented in rules as more codex than Dark Angels. In short, BA are codex chapter with psycho problem and unstable geneseed; while they have to solve these problems with suicide squads and specialist priest apothecaries, otherwise they try to follow the codex as closely as possible. DA, OTOH, are a non-codex chapter that follows the codex organisation on the surface, just enough to not attract attention and be left alone. While this fools casual observers or paper-pushers inspecting company rosters, the closer you look at them, the more you see they follow their on doctrines and organisation. Ruleswise, Blood Angels were always Ultramarines with Death Company, psychotic problem and modified vehicles. Dark Angels were always ones that use codex units in non-standard ways. "Troop" Land Speeders with non-standard loadout in 2nd edition, Tactical squads with Devastator weapons in 3rd, even elite scouts - DA army lists were always the ones turning the codex organisation on its head while pretending to follow it; there is much potential in that theme.
    I thought I was elitist. Then my wife said she's willing to enter 40k, but she wants a Squat army .

  16. #56
    Chapter Master Yodhrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Corner of No and Where.
    Posts
    1,740

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by soviet View Post
    Rolling the Dark Angels into the Space Marines codex would not result in any additional stuff for non-Marines.

    Marines don't dominate the release schedule because they have so many variant armies to support. Marines dominate the release schedule because Marines sell extremely well. You could roll all of the variant books into Codex Space Marines, and that book would be a million pages long, and Tau and Orks and Craftworld Eldar still wouldn't get any extra stuff. What you'd get instead would be more second and third waves of Marine models and more regular revisions of the codex book itself. Xenos don't get as much support as Marines because they don't sell as well, it's as simple as that.
    Have you heard the phrase "self-fulfilling prophesy"? It applies. Non Marines will never sell the same as Marines, that's true, it's simply a function of demographics and the background material, but GW exacerbates this disparity by giving such a ludicrous amount of support to Marine armies. There's a difference between having a flagship product, and having a product you push to the exclusion of everything else in your range; one is sound business, the other is daft from any angle.

  17. #57
    Librarian gutsmaka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    australia
    Posts
    451

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    dark angels and chaos legions in the starter set?! when was this? last I heard there was fall of damnos with necrons and ultra SMurfs! and here I was looking forward to a unique necron unit
    is rumored to be an indoctrinated necron slave

    Quote Originally Posted by Maarten K
    everybody knows thats dwarves and elves are the male and female versions of the same race, hence the perceived lack of female dwarves and testosteron toting elves, plus their constant bickering....

  18. #58
    Commander
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Basingstoke, UK
    Posts
    795

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Sir_Turalyon View Post
    Actually, wrong. Blood Angels were always described and represented in rules as more codex than Dark Angels. In short, BA are codex chapter with psycho problem and unstable geneseed; while they have to solve these problems with suicide squads and specialist priest apothecaries, otherwise they try to follow the codex as closely as possible. DA, OTOH, are a non-codex chapter that follows the codex organisation on the surface, just enough to not attract attention and be left alone. While this fools casual observers or paper-pushers inspecting company rosters, the closer you look at them, the more you see they follow their on doctrines and organisation. Ruleswise, Blood Angels were always Ultramarines with Death Company, psychotic problem and modified vehicles. Dark Angels were always ones that use codex units in non-standard ways. "Troop" Land Speeders with non-standard loadout in 2nd edition, Tactical squads with Devastator weapons in 3rd, even elite scouts - DA army lists were always the ones turning the codex organisation on its head while pretending to follow it; there is much potential in that theme.
    I'll hold my hands up and call truth on this one, though Blood Angels have always had a penchant for more jump pack equipped troops than footslogging tactical squads.

    Re-read Angels of Death last night. Good times.

    This thread has pretty much run its course for me. Some people agree with me, some disagree (for valid reasons). Lots of people didn't bother to read the OP and went of on a rant. Guess that's the internet in a nutshell.

    cheers, folks.

  19. #59

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by Cricket1982 View Post
    TBH, when I see any marine force that's not mainly made up of tactical marines then the player is playing against their fluff as tacticals are supposed to be the backbone of the army.. not just something you have to put up with.
    without trying to derail the thread, that is a very short sighted attitude. What about White Scars and "biker" chapters? they used to have WD rules which let them take bikers as troops. How about a force based on a first company strike force, with infiltrating scouts? How about a devestator company?

    Just because they're the backbone of some, even most chapters does not mean all army lists must be, or should be based around them.

    Dark Angels are Dark Angels. they have a history of a unique codex. roll with it. personally, i just wish they had 4 battle companies, instead of 3 along with the reserve, scout, deathwing and ravenwing companies.

  20. #60
    Librarian DEADMARSH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Evansville, IN, USA
    Posts
    461

    Re: Why It Wouldn't Be A Bad Thing for 40K if Dark Angels Become the Poster Boys

    Quote Originally Posted by ErictheGreen View Post
    OK, so quick heads up, this will be a long post. I'm hearing a lot of chatter about "Inner Circle Squads", "Plasma Predators", "Jetbike Units" and such in wishlisting threads for the new Dark Angel codex (which we've heard naff all about).

    So far, gathering rumours, we have the following;
    - Dark Angels and Chaos will be in the starter box for 6th
    - Dark Angels may, or may not be a Chaplain heavy chapter, with specific chaplain units offering bonuses like Sang. Priests or Wolf Guard.
    There is nothing else. GWs new rumour policy has hit us all. No confirmation that anyone is working on a Dark Angels book.

    Now. As far as the fluff goes, the Dark Angels are a Codex Adherent Chapter with the exception of the Deathwing and the Ravenwing.

    The Vanilla Space Marine book, though showing its age compared to Grey Knights and some of the newer books is still a competitive book (if only at tier 2) and is capable of a wide variety of armies.

    So, given GW's predeliction with releasing a Marine codex very close to a new edition release, to capitalise on "Little Timmy" wanting to be an 8ft tall superwarrior, it is a fair bet that both Chaos Legions and a marine codex of some description will come out just before or just after 6th edition hits. As Dark Angels are confirmed in the box set, this would mean the aforementioned Marine codex should be Dark Angels.

    Or would it?
    For a stand alone Dark Angels codex to be viable, there needs to be significant divergence from the current regular Space Marine codex or any one in the future. Ravenwing will need to be comparable power wise with White Scar bike armies (they currently aren't) and the tactical marines would have to be significantly different to justify a Dark Angels "Greenwing". This divergence brings with it complexity.

    Complexity is the issue. At first glance, Codex: Space Marines is a simple book. Tactical Squads at its core, battle company ethos. ATSKNF makes them more forgiving, combat tactics looks like a nice trick. The basic building blocks of the game are in this book, because they have to be. Most new players of the young variety will be picking Space Marines. As you know more about the game, then you can squeeze the power out of the book with Vulkan, Shrike and Khan, avoiding some of the more underpowered units in competitive play.

    A Dark Angels codex that is divergent enough to justify its own existence will not be like this, so it makes little sense for GW to put this up as the poster boy.

    [EDIT] By poster boy, I mean the chapter that gets "the push". In the box set, on the starter set of paints etc.

    It also means the following;
    - Black Templars, Space Wolves, Blood Angels, Dark Angels, Vanilla Marines
    - Imperial Guard, Tau, Orks, Eldar, Dark Eldar, Tyranids, Necrons, Daemons, Chaos Space Marines
    - Grey Knights
    - Sister of Battle

    16 factions. Given the design time needed on a book is upwards of 6 months (closer to 12 is my guess), your factions get updated less often, their models go through peaks and troughs of sales. This is ignoring any development on WHFB.

    Rolling the Dark Angels into the Vanilla Space Marine book frees up design time. That means better (and more regular) Xenos updates. Which means Space Marine players have a reason to buy another army, rather than just another codex. While the Space Marine line is hugely profitable and units go across the books, having players invest in another faction with guarenteed more regular updates would go a long way to GW developing a cross sell strategy.

    So how difficult would it be for Dark Angels to be incorporated into the current incarnation of Vanilla Marines? Well;
    - Tactical squads, predators, dreadnoughts, assault marines, librarians, masters (captains), devestators, land raiders, vindicators, whirlwinds, land speeders and scouts all get a straight port across (with the requisite points and options adjustments)
    - company veterans become sternguard or vanguard, respectively
    - Sammael is added as a special character with his jetbike or land speeder. He replaces combat tactics with scout.
    - Belial goes straight across. He replaces combat tactics with fearless and allowing terminator squads as troops (he gets a points bump)
    - Terminator squads no longer split into assault and tactical. The terminator squad costs X points (less than 200) for 5 terminators equipped with 4 powerfists, 1 power sword and 5 storm bolters. Upgrade to chainfist for 5 points per model. Upgrade to lightning claws for 5 points per model, upgrade to THSS for 10 points per model. Cyclone missile launcher, assault cannon and heavy flamer stay the same price. In this way, your THSS equiped squad is going to cost you more than it does now (and should appease some of the moaners), but you gain tactical flexibility. And if you want a mixed squad, you have to buy 2 kits (bonus for GW)
    - Ravenwing no longer exist. They are absorbed into the bike squad entry.
    - maybe room for a third DA special character, as we are the poster boys (Ezekiel or Azrael) who grant Stubborn in place of combat tactics, or in addition. Lose a couple of the lesser played UM SC - sicarius, the librarian. I'd keep Khan, but he may go also.

    So you get a codex with deathwing, a better ravenwing, can still build an army based on tactical marines thats effective and you don't affect the current space marine codex in a horrendous way.

    I appreciate everyone wants to be a unique flower, but when looking at the constraints on the design team already (who have to balance 16 factions in 40k and however many else in Fantasy), it makes sense from a business perspective and for the good of the game system to roll Dark Angels into the new Space Marine codex.

    [EDIT] Seeing as a lot of replies have been SOLELY related to my pointing out of the weaknesses of the Dark Angels book, I've removed it. It's not relevant to the argument.
    You make some valid points, but a lot of assumptions too, OP.

    Long story short though, it's all plausible because it's all up to GW what to do. If the powers-that-be want DA to be divergent, they will be. If they want them to be adherent, they will be.

    As for the whole "poster boy", I could see it. I think part of the reason that Ultramarines were "chosen" to be the current poster boys is because blue is extremely easy to get right and UMs have very little detailing. I have nothing to back this up other than my opinion, but if you think about the other poster boys in the past as have been mentioned several times previously in this thread, UMs would be much easier to paint for a person new to the hobby than any of the others. I have to assume somebody at GW thought of this too. I've never painted up any DAs, but I have to figure dark green must be about as easy to get right as blue.

    That being said, if GW is considering what current players might want and not just new players, DAs aren't a bad choice there either because maybe the new models will be interesting enough current Ultra players buy some DA stuff rather than repaint, or maybe the DA will have some interesting new rule/ model, etc. If nothing else, it will be cheaper to start DA than any other Marine army because of their inclusion in the box set and the relative value of the box (esp. if the player is interested also in starting a non-marine [read: Chaos or whoever the opponent is] army at some point).

    I've not been into the hobby nearly as long as some folks, but I have been into it for about 8 years now. Personally, I'd be surprised if GW make a combined Codex: Space Marines/ DA. If we were having this conversation back at the eve of 5th, you could have talked me into it, but it seems as though the pendulum has swung back the opposite way with making armies very different from each other again after all the combining and streamlining of 5th ed codexes. As unique as the Space Wolves and Blood Angels codexes are(not to mention GKs who effectively are just another Marine army now as opposed to being the DHs they were in the past), I'd have a hard time believing that GW would suddenly roll DAs into the vanilla codex.

    Would I be shocked? Well, nothing GW does flat out shocks me as they appear to have a very... unique means of making business decisions it seems, but it would surprise me, yes and it would go against the current line of thinking they've exhibited lately.
    Last edited by DEADMARSH; 22-03-2012 at 14:06.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •