Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 30

Thread: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

  1. #1
    Commander Lord Squidar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Helsingfors, Finland
    Posts
    612

    A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    OK so the new model is awesome, and huge, and I think I understand why they went in this direction. Two armies at the moment have griffons, the High Elves, and the Empire.

    High Elves: They get their griffons from the Annullii mountains. I believe that the griffons, while tame, are allowed to roam free, as do the high elf horses. There are no stables and breaking in of the beast, they are free range. When the lord needs to ride his horse or griffon, he calls it, and talks to it in animal speech, and off they go. Its more of a contract of use than a master/beast relationship. Thus the griffons would be closer to their natural form, so example a mustang horse. Smaller and faster.


    Now to the Empire. They have been using griffons for a long time, but do not have the animal speech and rearing skills of the high elves. The griffons are kept in stables, and probably broken in, much like any horse would be. Since they can't just sing to the air and have their friends arrive, they are are bred in the stables. Like any breeding program that lasts at least 2500 years (Sigmar's time), it has a severe impact on the animals themselves. As armour got heavier, the animals needed to be stronger and bulkier, and selective breeding would have brought this about. Where High Elves ride Mustangs, the Empire ride those massive muscled Norwegian horses x 10.

    It makes sense to me, and although the stats are the same, a human warrior and an orc have the same strength stat, so its not such a big deal
    Chaos Daemons 40K 6th Edition: W = 2, L = 3, D = 0.

  2. #2
    Chaplain
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Leicestershire, UK
    Posts
    221

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    I think your theory holds water. But the true reason is probably GW's love for making big things at the moment. I don't like the new griffon myself, I was hoping it would be more like the high elf griffon from island of blood.

  3. #3

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    The high elf griffin is very cool- but also rather more falconiform than past griffin models.

    The imperial griffin being more eagle-like as well as bulkier, might have to do with it being a different subspecies: "Old World Griffin" compared to the "Annulli Griffin"

  4. #4

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    That explains why it got bulkier, but why did it's head shrink?
    Love Coffee. Hate Starbucks. dirty tax avoiders

  5. #5

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    As far as I can tell it didn't- the body grew but the head remained the same size, so to speak.

  6. #6
    Chapter Master Col. Tartleton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,568

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Griffons, Hippogryphs, Pegasi, Chimeras, Manticores, etc. are chaos creatures.

    Ulthuan has far less chaos taint than the Empire because of the Vortex. So they're less mutated. The new Imperial Griffons are prone to mutations like two heads. But on the plus side they're the size of houses, it would be silly not to use them. That's why you might see a Jabberslythe in Imperial territory but not in Ulthuan.

  7. #7

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    I thought someone said the Imperial Griffons being bred in captivity was mentioned in WD or the army book? Hope that is true. I rather like the idea of the Empire breeding griffons to be bigger, stronger and more vicious than their wild counterparts.
    In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only British.
    Actual (alleged) girl. Alpha Female.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jes Goodwin
    They breed more anyway, its a pretty rough place, Commoragh, there's a lot of it going off.

  8. #8

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    It's definitely in the White Dwarf- haven't seen the army book yet since its not out and the local stores don't have an early copy.

    On differing head size relative to body- compare Shetland ponies to carthorses. If you selectively breed an animal for size, the body might tend to grow more than the head does.

  9. #9
    Brother Sergeant Jape's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Liverpool Hive
    Posts
    26

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Plenty of good logic - High Elves are hippies and the Empire are eugenicists. Just as it should be.

  10. #10

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Quote Originally Posted by Iron_Lord View Post
    It's definitely in the White Dwarf- haven't seen the army book yet since its not out and the local stores don't have an early copy.

    On differing head size relative to body- compare Shetland ponies to carthorses. If you selectively breed an animal for size, the body might tend to grow more than the head does.
    Well carthorse is not a very good example because they don't have particularly shrunken heads relative to size. Also a carthorse is a beast of burden, whereas a griffon is a fighting beast, hence a strong head and jaws (or beak in this case) would be more important.
    Love Coffee. Hate Starbucks. dirty tax avoiders

  11. #11
    Chapter Master TheDungen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    3,278

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    While it feels right that empire griffons should be bulkier than the high elf versions it feels wrong that an imperial griffon should be mightier than an elvish one. Arent the griffons of charce descibed in like the 6th edition army book to be the most powerful of their kind?

    Quote Originally Posted by Col. Tartleton View Post
    Griffons, Hippogryphs, Pegasi, Chimeras, Manticores, etc. are chaos creatures.

    Ulthuan has far less chaos taint than the Empire because of the Vortex. So they're less mutated. The new Imperial Griffons are prone to mutations like two heads. But on the plus side they're the size of houses, it would be silly not to use them. That's why you might see a Jabberslythe in Imperial territory but not in Ulthuan.
    Ulthuan does not have less chaos taint than the empire Ulthuan is the grounding rod of the warhammer world. The anulli is often decribed as being a part of another world. you could propably see demons manifest there.
    They are also creatures of chaos descent not chaos creatures. They are beings created by chaos during the time of chaos but each individual griffon is born from other griffons rather than a mutation from a lion and an eagle (which the first griffons were). same goes for the other creatures you described.

  12. #12

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Arent the griffons of charce descibed in like the 6th edition army book to be the most powerful of their kind?
    Probably, but then every troop type is described in every army book as the mightiest of their kind these days.

  13. #13
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Western Australia
    Posts
    1,070

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    One could argue that the griffons of the old world are simply larger and more ferocious due to evolution and the enviroments in which they live?

    There are far more natural prey and larger prddators in the old world as opposed to ulthuans relativley peaceful island that there creatures are more gracefull as opposed to stronger and more violent old world variants.

    This combined with an imperial breeding program would ensure that old world griffins are innately more vicious and once mature are far more imposing than there HE cousins.

  14. #14

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Quote Originally Posted by Craze_b0i View Post
    Well carthorse is not a very good example because they don't have particularly shrunken heads relative to size. Also a carthorse is a beast of burden, whereas a griffon is a fighting beast, hence a strong head and jaws (or beak in this case) would be more important.
    It's more noticable when you compare carthorse to Shetland pony- or better yet, miniature Shetland pony.

    Compare a Scottish Terrier to a Great Dane
    Compare a domestic cat to a Siberian Tiger
    Compare a goldcrest to a Raven
    Compare a pygmy owl to an eagle owl
    Compare a falconet to a gyrfalcon

    Consistantly, the smaller animal will tend to have a larger head (relatively) than the bigger one.

  15. #15

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    But why would you compare carthorses and shetland ponies? One is not evolved from the other.

    It's not about size its about purpose.

    On balance however I don't think anymore the head is as small as it looked from first appearances, it just looked small from angle of the photo that leaked on the rumour section.
    Love Coffee. Hate Starbucks. dirty tax avoiders

  16. #16

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Quote Originally Posted by Craze_b0i View Post
    But why would you compare carthorses and shetland ponies? One is not evolved from the other.

    It's not about size its about purpose.
    A few hundred years of selective breeding isn't necessarily going to increase a creature's head size much. Quite apart from eagles killing with their claws rather than their beaks- and griffins being modelled on eagles.

    The point I was trying to make is- regardless of evolution- larger land creatures will tend to have smaller heads relative to their bodies than smaller creatures do. Even if both are of the same species.

    it may have to do with the laws of physics- as a creature scales up, it becomes more difficult to manage a heavy head- since mass is cubed, but neck area is only squared.

    That's why giant sauropods have tiny heads, compared to their ancestors.

    Or it may have to do with neotony- little dogs retain "puppylike" proportions into adulthood, but big ones don't.

  17. #17

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Incidentally, Cruddace confirms centuries of selective breeding created the imperial griffon, in the Empire video on the GW website. Just if there was any doubt.
    In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only British.
    Actual (alleged) girl. Alpha Female.
    Quote Originally Posted by Jes Goodwin
    They breed more anyway, its a pretty rough place, Commoragh, there's a lot of it going off.

  18. #18
    Chaplain
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Bristol
    Posts
    190

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Squidar View Post
    So example a mustang horse. Smaller and faster. High Elves ride Mustangs
    As far as I can remember Elven steeds are supposed to be huge powerful beasts...

  19. #19

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    ...but not significantly larger or more powerful. You've been reading some new fluff eh? heheh..

  20. #20
    Chapter Master FashaTheDog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    The Bureaucracy of Anarchy with the Space Monkeys in the Mischief Committee of Project Mayhem.
    Posts
    1,887

    Re: A theory on the Imperial Griffon

    Why are Imperial griffins' heads so small? Probably all the steroids they take.

    As for breeding them to be that different in such a short time, you need to take a note from Red Mage; once you've maxed out your animal husbandry skill and shot magic into their chromosomes until they turn inside out, such a thing is child's play.
    Wear a monocle and Bob Schieffer will laugh at you on the evening news.

    Hurricanes are not the best way to keep crime down, Mr. Bloomberg.


    “Well, I’ve got two pythons and a tiny guy in a rhinoceros costume with an obsession with disco,”

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •