Eldar - Fear The Rainbow!
My Eldar Painting Log (including Revenant/Phantom/Super Heavies) or direct gallery - random selection of 16 years painting Eldar
Meh, just sharpie out the fluff that hints at losing technology, cause it's dumb. Exarch Bonesinger Tim, who never leaves the craftworld, can just sing up whatever the hell he wants to, and hes got thousands of years of practice doing it. When Tim dies of old age, the next Bonesinger Exarch will inherit all of Tim's knowledge, and all the knowledge of Tim's successors.
So, if anything, the Eldar should be GAINING technology.
My painting log, Alaitoc Eldar and Dark Angels:
http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...89#post5897489
Well, even in epic many, if not most, of the Titans were painted in accordance with their craftworld while their banners displayed their clan, craftworld and weaponry and any other heraldry that is deemed appropriate.
However IA11 doesn't so much change the clan fluff as much as it ignores it completely. For my phantom I created a clan from the ground up as there isn't any fluff I could find about the Ulthwe clans, but from what I could find it most certainly is not a sin to paint them in the craftworld colors or out of them. Though, I will say I may have missed some fluff that creeped up in some small fluff blurb.
I had been really looking forward to more expansive phantom fluff about the clans and such, but they let that chance slip by. However, while they seem to have abandoned the notions of triplets (which are still in Path of the Seer as Phantom Pilots) they did update the language from the original description they put up on-line as an "Exarch" to a "Steersman" in the book.
Fantasy Novels:www.TheEverWar.com
Are you perchance a salt salesman, or do you derive income from salt sales related activities?
See My Ulthwe Plog Now Including a Phantom Titan and Dark Eldar
How To Build A Phantom Titan pdf
My Most Recent Battle Report January 6th 2013
In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only British.
Actual (alleged) girl. Alpha Female.Originally Posted by Jes Goodwin
How is it possible to lose the knowledge of how to construct something when you can literally ask your dead how it was done?
Because your dead might not have possessed that knowledge in the first place. Not all Eldar walk a particular path, and even those who do might not go far enough to learn how to create everything the path has to offer. Some designs might conceivably be restricted to the foremost specialists. Now, if enough of the guys that posses that particular knowledge are lost, they may end up losing the whole design.
Or, alternatively, they could ask the dead for a solution, but the specialized facilities required to manufacture something are either unavailable or come at a high cost, that would be better spent on other, more efficient technologies.
That's like saying that the USA doesn't know how to build an Aircraft carrier because the guys who built the last one died.
The Eldar are advanced, not dumb. They should have some means of strong information such as computers or in the infinity circuit.
Also I found the "it's all a feint to get a Phoenix Lord back" to be inappropriate to the scale of the battle. That's story would've sounded less dumb if it was a small 40k battle, but it becomes silly to waste so many lives, ships, titans and super heavies just to get your Aspect Lord back.
Sort of on topic I found it annoying that the Eldar kept using thier superior speed and manuevrability to charge headlong into the IG gun line. I was hoping for something more like the Tau did in Taros, showing that there can be more to maneuvering than is possible on a 40k table.
Last edited by Vandur Last; 11-05-2012 at 11:09. Reason: iPhone spellcheck
Although i enjoyed reading the story i too agree with Vandur Las points, the kind of operation needed to revive the Phoenix Lord should be more like a special Ops Eldar team appearing near the complex retrieve the Lord and dissapear, something i think Eldar could do without needing a fullscale planetary invasion to be the "distraction".
There are no perfect people in this world, just perfect intentions...
Well, I know how to build Software. I know how Windows operates to the core and such stuff. That doesn't mean I can create one myself or a big group of people on my knowledge will be able to reconstruct Windows 95 exactly the way it was. Windows 95 is just 17 years old and humanity didn't suffer from a destruction of all the core worlds. I'm not sure a guy with a laptop on board of a holiday-cruiser-ship would be able to build up something like Windows 95 either. He lacks various things to complete them.
Bonesinger Exarch or not, but even those guys need training and some systems might be lost indeed. What's the problem? The Eldar suffered from their fall. Why should all technology have survived? And actually we know for fact that it didn't, because Titans had been PRESITGE objects in the past, not used weapons! Wars had been fought autonomously by drones, same like every labor work. Not by living Eldar and not by Wraith-constructs either. One might now argue that Craftworlders don't use that because it lead to the Fall in the first place. Well... I wonder what's better, sending Guardians to the front or drones. I guess even Eldar would be smart enough to differ between dire need and pure lazyness. So... the tech *must* be lost or I overestimate the smartness of Eldar by far.
Eldar - Fear The Rainbow!
My Eldar Painting Log (including Revenant/Phantom/Super Heavies) or direct gallery - random selection of 16 years painting Eldar
Yeah, the scale was a bit off. If they had cut, say, 80% of the action on the book and left it with
@ Hendarion: I'm ok with technology from before the Fall being lost (although the craftworlds were also involved with manufacture as well as commerce), but not so much with post-fall tech. If anything, since the Fall the Eldar should have been consolidating their resources at the craftworlds, scavenging materials and equipment scattered across different planets or wrecks, as well as occasionally either founding something new or adapting old technology to their existing material base. "Losing technology that cannot be replicated" is the Imperial schtick, although they aren't exactly good at keeping to it with all those toys they are constantly getting. The Eldar should have spent the last 15 millenia trying to clean up all their old caches/ruins/ships they can get their hands on and moving everything up on the craftworlds, not losing what little they did pick up before they left.
Last edited by Shamana; 11-05-2012 at 12:07.
So a virtually immortal warrior and his cadre of elite warriors isn't worth mounting a large scale expedition to retrieve? Really not seeing the logic there. I felt the scale was right, they couldn't risk the IG figuring out what was going on so they had to launch a massive offensive to keep their attention fully occupied. In return one of a handful of demi-gods of war is returned to the Eldar people. Honestl I think most of ghe criticism is nitpicking for the sake of it. It could have been much, much worse far more easily then it could have been any better.
I mean if they had just had a spec-ops component and some small scale attacks, if anyone had figured out what had been going on and been able to send troops to stop the Eldar getting out of the caverns, Irrilyth could conceivably have been captured by the Imperium while still 'deceased'. That woudl have been a far greater disaster than losing a few thousand Eldar and a bit of materiel.
Last edited by eldargal; 11-05-2012 at 12:11.
In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only British.
Actual (alleged) girl. Alpha Female.Originally Posted by Jes Goodwin
Nitpicking? You could call it that, but as I was reading the book it kept bothering me that the Eldar doing things that made no sense, from their point of view. Their timing was off, the tactics for the war itself seemed improper, and they sustained casualties that could be avoided. It just didn't feel like what I imagined Eldar to fight like.
Last edited by Shamana; 11-05-2012 at 12:46.
Well the Imperium was the designated protagonist, and they always will be in an IA book. The story is told the Imperiums perspective, pieced together from what records they could find and probably a good bit of conjecture. So I stand by what I said, it could have been a whole lot worse under those circumstances.Sadly FW say they will never write a book from a Xenos perspective. The Eldar achieved their objectives and left, neither side was made to look stupid, I call it a win. There were some annoyances, but honestly I just can't see the scale of the engagement being one of them, especially since most of the other non-GW Eldar fluff is very small scale indeed.
In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only British.
Actual (alleged) girl. Alpha Female.Originally Posted by Jes Goodwin
I was also pretty disappointed by the lack of nuance shown in the book, especially when going back and re-reading the Vraks series. Most of the battles break down to a muddle of "and there was a huge fight with tons of shooting and stuff," as opposed to gritty descriptions of individual units in battle. Strategic maps, while pretty and 3-D, are just a vague series of arrows, and the characters do little except sit around and watch (the inquisitor in the final scene is a particularly egregious example... get off the MIU and shoot some xenos, man!).
That said, I do think the scale was about right. The corsairs are not the most controlled of Eldar forces, after all, so unleashing them in full force probably made for a better distraction.
There's also the fact that Eldar prophecy is far from infaliable. They might not have seen everything they need to. Read ADB's Void Stalker if you want an example
The blog of my eternally wandering mind - I do commissions. Shoot me a PM if you're interested.
They're not randumb. They're similar to humans, only drawn towards obsessive-compulsive behaviour which they keep in check through the Path process. There's no reason for them not to use tactics or behave logically. And the "lol, they're alien" argument only seems to be used to justify Eldar losing because they behaved like idiots.Originally Posted by WD127
Not exactly what I meant.
Eldar are a whole different civilization. While things that are tactically viable for us are generally tactically viable to them as well, I was more referring to their whole set of values. It's precisely their tendency towards extremes that I'm talking about.
For us, it makes no sense that the Eldar are going through all that trouble to accomplish their aims. But to them, achieving the objective of *THAT SPECIFIC* campaign means a lot more than it would to a human. They're willing to go way further than humans would, because they are instilled with the mindset that a Phoenix Lord is the key to their salvation as a race. They would rather kill millions of humans rather than have a small band of Eldar suffer harm. So whatever gets them to actually place their own lives on the line in such a crude fashion has got to be very, very important. Big enough to override their sense of self preservation.
To summarize my point, this is a very scaled up version of an Aspect Warrior sacrificing himself so that a Phoenix Lord may reincarnate.
Which they didn't do. The Eldar deployed a large enough force to force the Imperium to deply all its forces, preventing them from intercepting the Eldar revival squad. They drew out said Imperium forces, then fell back drawing Imperial forces further away from the true prize before up and leaving when they achieved their objective. The very opposite of randumb.
In the grim darkness of the far future, there is only British.
Actual (alleged) girl. Alpha Female.Originally Posted by Jes Goodwin
At the earliest the vast majority of the IOM forces were weeks and month away from being deployed.
A period of weeks passed before the main attack and the moment the IOM sensors were brought down. Plenty of time to have their huge army poped out of the webway closest from the phoenix lord location and take the phoenix lord tomb and leave, before the IOM can mount an effective counterattack. Minimal loses for the eldar, IOM, less bad blood and brigdes burned between the IOM and eldar, allowing the eldar to use the IOM in the future more likely.
What was written the eldar recovery of the phoenix lord was a near loss, the eldar lost lots of their warriors and warmachines, and created unneded bad blood between the IOM and eldar making future relashions more impossible. And all this without being needed for the success of the recovery operation.
It is like the authors want their cake and eat the cake. They want big battles between forces with almost even odds of success, even if realistically ,because of how their army operates , one side would achieve their objectives and leave without the second side being able to do anything to hurt or stop.
Realistically with the eldar advantages they would always win against the IOM on the ground.
And the writers couldn't find reasons for the eldar to delay the completion of the objective(that can be completed in hours) for couple of weeks so that the IOM can bring their forces forward. It is like the eldar stayed to try to kill as many humans as possible even if this was not needed or counterproductive.