Wooly Mammoth Sighting

[Dargon]

More likely its clear or in focus because its a childs toy in the snow. Look at the graininess of the snow.

I had the same thought. The snow shouldn't be that grainy at such a (supposed) long distance. The snow was definitely shot really close, which makes that mammoth teeny-tiny (no wonder no-one has seen them).

[Angelwing]

Going off how clear the image is, I'de say it was a CGI rendering and he's lying about the date it was taken.

More likely its clear or in focus because its a childs toy in the snow. Look at the graininess of the snow.

but I agree on the lies

I'd better explain myself I think. Yes, the photograph was taken in 1987, and in Berkshire, England. (Crowthorne to be precise). The camera used was similar to this.
The picture is a bit blurry because the camera was not designed to achieve such shots. The 'hard copy' photograph was scanned into digital form when I scanned all my old pictures last year. To preserve my sanity I had to choose a resolution that compromised between detail, file size and speed (I did 1500+ photo graphs...).

The 'mammoth' is a plastic childs toy from this range, of which I have collected since 1983 and have the complete set stood on a shelf in my lounge as we speak.

[ctsteel]

Oh My God there's a ghost's face in the background!

[Easy E]

Oh My God there's a ghost's face in the background!

Ghost face! Call Michael X. Cohen... oh wait... he only does cryptozoology.

A ghost face. Who should I call??????

[Angelwing]

Ghost face? You've got me looking carefully at my curtains now.

[Dylius]

Who should I call??????

GHOST BUSTERS!

You always have to reply when someone says that.

[El_Machinae]

It's probably a Cretian Mammoth in a really tiny stream!


edit: curious people then searched the term "Creatian Mammoth" and squeed.

[Jedi152]

CGI, and bad CGI at that.