Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 262

Thread: New Background in 6e Rulebook

  1. #201

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Veteran Sergeant View Post
    I was merely asking if there's been a clarification on this. It's a fairly glaring discrepancy. If you're seriously trying say that at least 23 allows for there to be 200 since 200 is more than 23, and this technically "at least" 23, and not merely being obnoxious, I feel like you need to slap yourself a few times.
    The chart with the First Founding Chapters in the new book is exactly the same chart that's been used since 2nd Edition, with the exact same footnotes - so the Ultramarines Successors that it names are still the ones from the Apocrypha of Davio (you know, the one which says there are 23 but "fails to name them"). The important word you need to be focusing on here is "Apocrypha": that chart has always been intentionally inaccurate and subject to the ravages of time and Imperial bureaucratic incompetence. It's an in-universe source, not Word of God background.

    Like with the two missing Legions, it's there to give fans a bit of room to play with.

  2. #202
    Chapter Master Hendarion's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Östlich
    Posts
    5,217

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Idaan View Post
    Here's a bigger version of the Xenos picture, courtesy of 4chanAttachment 144518
    Sorry that I didn't read all that stuff here, but what's that in the lower right? The tentacle-thing? Tentacles remind me of only one thing - Enslavers. Is this a new interpretation of 'em?
    Eldar - Fear The Rainbow!

    My Eldar Painting Log (including Revenant/Phantom/Super Heavies) or direct gallery
    - random selection of 16 years painting Eldar

  3. #203
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Akron, OH USA
    Posts
    2,719

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Thommy H View Post
    The chart with the First Founding Chapters in the new book is exactly the same chart that's been used since 2nd Edition, with the exact same footnotes - so the Ultramarines Successors that it names are still the ones from the Apocrypha of Davio (you know, the one which says there are 23 but "fails to name them"). The important word you need to be focusing on here is "Apocrypha": that chart has always been intentionally inaccurate and subject to the ravages of time and Imperial bureaucratic incompetence. It's an in-universe source, not Word of God background.
    This!!!


    I can't understand why anyone has ever considered that chart the be all, end all, word on the number and names of second founding chapters. It was a list of some examples and implies that there are lots more for each legion that aren't listed.
    Once upon a midnight dreary...
    Quote Originally Posted by Hanska of Kompletely Kroot, May 12 2009, 12:42 PM
    May your enemies taste as sweet as your victories...
    Quote Originally Posted by paddyalexander View Post
    I agree though, gwPLC are not evil. Greedy, incompetent bullies... yes. Not evil, true evil requires intelligence and focus that they've not been demonstrating for the last 6-5 years.

  4. #204

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    IIRC the Grey Knights Codex mentioned something along the lines of 400 Second Founding Chapters to have been around in the early days of the Grey Knights.
    My blog: CONTEMPLATIONS OF THE HERETICAL MIND

    Troll Forged Miniatures: A sculptors collective where sculptors can come together!

  5. #205

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Veteran Sergeant View Post
    Ignoring the semantics of "about" vs "at least" (/facepalm), you didn't do so well with math did you?

    If the Ultramarines were around 250,000 before Calth, suffered around 40-50% casualties there, it leaves them around 125-150,000 Space Marines. Then, the fluff maintains they bounced back and very quickly outstripped the other Legions to represent over half of all Space Marines which would put them back in the 200,000 range at least. Now, we get to the math, so break out the calculator if you need one. A modern Codex Astartes Chapter is ~1,000 Marines. 200,000/1000 = 200. Even if we say that they continued to take casualties at the rate equal to their brother Space Marines, and stayed in the 150,000 range, that's still 150 Successors. Now, Know No Fear told us an Ultramarines Chapter was, before the Codex Astartes 10,000 Marines. So it's possible that the original breakdown was 10,000 per Second Founding chapter, which would make sense (230,000/10,000=23). However, we've never been told anything of the sort. So, either the Scouring and Heresy caused tremendous casualties, killing more than 90% of the Space Marines in the galaxy (what would be required to reduce the Ultramarines from 250,000 to 23,000), or the numbers no longer match up. I successfully completed all of the math classes required below grade six, so I'm confident of my numbers.

    I was merely asking if there's been a clarification on this. It's a fairly glaring discrepancy. If you're seriously trying say that at least 23 allows for there to be 200 since 200 is more than 23, and this technically "at least" 23, and not merely being obnoxious, I feel like you need to slap yourself a few times.
    The most extensive account of the Second Founding comes from the in-universe Apocrypha of Davos, and this text only names 23 successor Chapters for the Ultramarines, whilst specifically stating that there may be more unrecorded. This represents the loss of Imperial knowledge through time and the secrecy of the Astartes, whilst also allowing players to develop their own Ultramarines successors in some forgotten sector of the Imperium.

  6. #206

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    I imagine many Second Founding chapters were deleted from history. The Imperium at large doesn't need to know about chapters being lost in the warp, destroyed in war or subverted by chaos. Better for them to have 'never existed' to begin with.
    Sent from my Astropath using Tele Talk

  7. #207
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    The Beach
    Posts
    395

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by ForgottenLore View Post
    This!!!


    I can't understand why anyone has ever considered that chart the be all, end all, word on the number and names of second founding chapters. It was a list of some examples and implies that there are lots more for each legion that aren't listed.
    It isn't about anything other than questioning whether or not there has been a retcon of that bit of fluff.

    I don't know what's so difficult for people to understand about that. It's a pretty simple question. I've been playing this gave since the early 90s, and the discrepancy of numbers created by the Horus Heresy novels is something eventually needs to be addressed and I figured this would be the time they'd do it. Good lord, so much chest puffing over a simple, legitimate question. The Grey Knights codex says just over 400 chapters were in existence at the time of thd Second Founding, so I wondered if the back story had been altered to reflect that. Seems like lazy copy/paste editing ruled the day. Fair enough.

  8. #208

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    I think the point we were making is that the bit of fluff in question isn't "there were 23 Ultramarines' Successors" it's "the Imperium's fragmentary records say there were 23, but the source is untrustworthy enough that even they call it apocryphal" which really has no bearing on anything in the HH novels, since they're an actual retelling of events and this is a source from 10,000 years later.

    So there really isn't a need for a retcon as there's no inconsistency. The records are still wrong - we now know why they're called "The Apocrypha" in fact...

  9. #209
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Commoragh
    Posts
    1,519

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Seems Exterminatuses(Exterminatii? Exterminatices?) have been changed a bit. page154, quote: "Such a command can only come from the highest ranks of the Imperium - a Space Marine Chapter Master, Lord High Admiral of the Imperial Navy, Lord Commander of the Imperial Guard or an Inquisitor."

    It then goes on to explain that the actual means with which exterminatus is performed varies depending on who calls it down. The marines, for instance, apparantly have access to some sort of unspecified device, that can decimate the planet if brought to the surface(some sort of non-droppable bomb, if I'm reading this right). The Navy is capable of unleaching such overkill shelling that the result is, in effect, Exteminatus. The Inquisition keeps using the "classics"(virus bombs, cyclonic torpedoes).
    Quote Originally Posted by Avian View Post
    Never attribute to malice what can be attributed to a shaky grasp of English.

  10. #210

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Thommy H View Post
    the Apocrypha of Davio
    Quote Originally Posted by Fear Ghoul View Post
    Apocrypha of Davos
    Skaros

    And yes, that was my point - there's a very important difference between "at least" and "about". If the chart says "at least 23 Successors" and it looks probable that there were 400, then there is no contradiction. The note in Codex: Grey Knights appears to be written in a more "out-of-universe" style. The exact number is irrelevant, anyway - all it serves to say is "there were a load of Ultramarines Successors created, and now no-one's entirely sure where they all are".
    Last edited by AndrewGPaul; 05-07-2012 at 07:35.

  11. #211

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Veteran Sergeant View Post
    It isn't about anything other than questioning whether or not there has been a retcon of that bit of fluff.

    I don't know what's so difficult for people to understand about that. It's a pretty simple question. I've been playing this gave since the early 90s, and the discrepancy of numbers created by the Horus Heresy novels is something eventually needs to be addressed and I figured this would be the time they'd do it. Good lord, so much chest puffing over a simple, legitimate question. The Grey Knights codex says just over 400 chapters were in existence at the time of thd Second Founding, so I wondered if the back story had been altered to reflect that. Seems like lazy copy/paste editing ruled the day. Fair enough.
    The only change that has occurred is the number of Marines constituting a Legion - previously 10,000 and now closer to 100,000. Neither number is inconsistent with the number of second founding Ultramarine successors named in-universe in an Apocrypha text.

  12. #212

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Thommy H View Post
    The chart with the First Founding Chapters in the new book is exactly the same chart that's been used since 2nd Edition, with the exact same footnotes - so the Ultramarines Successors that it names are still the ones from the Apocrypha of Davio (you know, the one which says there are 23 but "fails to name them"). The important word you need to be focusing on here is "Apocrypha": that chart has always been intentionally inaccurate and subject to the ravages of time and Imperial bureaucratic incompetence. It's an in-universe source, not Word of God background.

    Like with the two missing Legions, it's there to give fans a bit of room to play with.
    Except its not exactly the same. Look again, Soul Drinkers are now finaly accepted as an Imperial Fists successor!
    Quote Originally Posted by Son of Morkai View Post
    You need to buy 5 finecast Karamazovs to get enough non-mangled parts to build 1.

    /bandwagon

  13. #213
    Chapter Master baphomael's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Hullywood/Nottingham
    Posts
    3,880

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    On the subject of the Apocrypha of Skaros, some people shouldn't read too deeply into it. As noted, there's a reason its called the Apocrypha of Shares. It's, well, apocryphal.

    For those unfamiliar with the word, it can variously mean hidden, esoteric, spurious, unreliable texts. In the Christian tradition, apocryphal texts are those biblical texts that are not deemed to be Canonical. Given the imperial faith seems to be modelled on Judeo-Christian influence, particularly a caricature of Roman, medieval and early modern Christianity, the fact that in-universe it is dubbed an apocryphal text says a lot.

    What's more telling, is that its the only real, or at least the primary, source for a 'historical' text on it from an Imperial historical perspective. While it is recognised as apocryphal, the imperious probably doesn't have a better source.
    But yea, its probably best to take all in universr fluff as apocryphal... its a huge part of the theme, the reason several GW writers have said, on the subject of the background, that essentially everything, and nothing, published is true. It's all spurious rumour, questionable content, biased sources, superstitious colouring, mythic retelling. In short, a little bit like pre-modern history.... only ramped up to 11.
    RSPCA - Royal Society for the Preservation of Craftworld Avatars. Put a stop to Avatar abuse. Full stop.


    Quote Originally Posted by Fortheempire View Post
    Plus what could Lorgar possibly be meditating on for 9-10 thousand years? Was he producing Guns N Roses last album?

  14. #214
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    The Beach
    Posts
    395

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Thommy H View Post
    I think the point we were making is that the bit of fluff in question isn't "there were 23 Ultramarines' Successors" it's "the Imperium's fragmentary records say there were 23, but the source is untrustworthy enough that even they call it apocryphal" which really has no bearing on anything in the HH novels, since they're an actual retelling of events and this is a source from 10,000 years later.

    So there really isn't a need for a retcon as there's no inconsistency. The records are still wrong - we now know why they're called "The Apocrypha" in fact...
    To paraphrase the villain from Die Hard, if you steal a thousand dollars, you can just disappear. If you steal ten million dollars, they will find you.

    Losing track of a handful of Chapters is one thing. Losing track of three hundred and fifty (or nearly 88% of them) is somewhat different, lol. I mean, Space Marine chapters keep all these detailed histories, revere all of these ancient heroes, and recount ancient battles. You're telling me they're going to have lost track of all of these successors? Especially the ones which are directly spawned from their original Legion?

    If you're willing to accept the gap with a wave of your hand, be my guest. It seems like something that needs to be retconned for clarity due to the change in fluff. After all, if the entire history of the Necrons can be changed, this seems like a very minor detail to change and hardly sacrosanct.

  15. #215

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Veteran Sergeant View Post
    To paraphrase the villain from Die Hard, if you steal a thousand dollars, you can just disappear. If you steal ten million dollars, they will find you.

    Losing track of a handful of Chapters is one thing. Losing track of three hundred and fifty (or nearly 88% of them) is somewhat different, lol. I mean, Space Marine chapters keep all these detailed histories, revere all of these ancient heroes, and recount ancient battles. You're telling me they're going to have lost track of all of these successors? Especially the ones which are directly spawned from their original Legion?

    If you're willing to accept the gap with a wave of your hand, be my guest. It seems like something that needs to be retconned for clarity due to the change in fluff. After all, if the entire history of the Necrons can be changed, this seems like a very minor detail to change and hardly sacrosanct.
    In 10,000 years it's not particularly difficult to lose such information. We totally lost any ability to read ancient hieroglyphs for 1400 years and still wouldn't be able to read them now if it wasn't for one very lucky find in the Rosetta Stone. We're still missing big chunks of information on the Roman Empire, which was a continental spanning empire which fell in the West only 1600 years ago. Very little is known about massive chunks of England's history from about 400-600. Some of the earliest computer data is unreadable now because we can't read the file formats anymore and that was only like 50/60 years ago (totally stupid but also shows how humans often lack foresight). The point I'm trying to make here it's that it's perfectly possible to lose massive amounts of information over long periods and what we're looking at is nearly ten times the time span of the things I quoted. You should also take account of the decentralisation of the Imperium, Terra might well have lost information on dozens of Ultramarines Chapters but you'd imagine that on Macragge there would be better kept records because it's more important to them. Dozens of those Chapters might well have been destroyed and modern Terra just shrugs it's shoulders because it never knew they existed because their loss has long been forgotten, whereas the Ultramarines will probably remember their loss although even they will probably not have full records. At the same time if Terra has no idea of these long lost or dead Chapters it's not likely to go asking the Ultramarines for any information on them as Terra being Terra will automatically assume it has the best information at hand. It's not really hand waving, it's the nature of the beast, both in terms of poor record keeping over thousands of years and also the character of the Imperium. Sure the real reason is because of the evolving fluff and how the old stuff doesn't link perfectly with it but the in universe explanation works perfectly well also.
    Last edited by Londinium; 06-07-2012 at 01:09.
    Death is nothing compared to Vindication - Konrad Curze/Night Haunter

  16. #216

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    I seem to remember that when the Legions split up many of the Chapters were over-strength. Until natural attrition reduced them to the required level. What else can you do when the survivors are not exactly devisable by 1000. You could have understrength chapters, but also the initial command corp could only be stretched so far.

  17. #217
    Chaplain DYoung's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    277

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Veteran Sergeant View Post
    To paraphrase the villain from Die Hard, if you steal a thousand dollars, you can just disappear. If you steal ten million dollars, they will find you.

    Losing track of a handful of Chapters is one thing. Losing track of three hundred and fifty (or nearly 88% of them) is somewhat different, lol. I mean, Space Marine chapters keep all these detailed histories, revere all of these ancient heroes, and recount ancient battles. You're telling me they're going to have lost track of all of these successors? Especially the ones which are directly spawned from their original Legion?

    If you're willing to accept the gap with a wave of your hand, be my guest. It seems like something that needs to be retconned for clarity due to the change in fluff. After all, if the entire history of the Necrons can be changed, this seems like a very minor detail to change and hardly sacrosanct.
    I think the fact that the Imperium has existed in more or less the same form for 10,000 years is itself fairly amazing. Not to mention that 18 out of the 20 original space marine legions are not only remembered but are still flying around and kicking ****.

  18. #218

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    It doesn't say they've lost track of them. After all, there are plenty of examples of Chapters with unclear antecedents - the Red Scorpions, Minotaurs, Astral Claws and others. All that is lost is a precise record of their founding.

    It appears there are two apocrypha, according to Lexicanum; the Apocrypha of Skaros, which is the earliest known copy of the Codex Astartes and states there were at least 23 Successors of the Ultramarines, and the Apocrypha of Davio, a list of the Second Founding Space Marine chapters made in M33. I don't have a copy of the 4th edition Codex: Space Marines to hand, so I can't check what it says about the latter. In addition, we don't know if either volume is complete - the Skaros document could list twenty-three Chapters and then the next pages are missing.

  19. #219

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    There is a chance they didn't want to keep track of successor chapters. Splitting the legions was meant to break down power bases. Keeping record of such strong ties between chapters wouldn't be helpful in this regard.

    That said, oral tradition is strong and even in 10k years it seems hard to believe a (surviving) second founding chapter would forget it's origin. Based on this thought, could it be that many of the original 2nd founding chapters are now extinct?
    Sent from my Astropath using Tele Talk

  20. #220

    Re: New Background in 6e Rulebook

    Quote Originally Posted by Harwammer View Post
    That said, oral tradition is strong and even in 10k years it seems hard to believe a (surviving) second founding chapter would forget it's origin. Based on this thought, could it be that many of the original 2nd founding chapters are now extinct?
    More than likely this is the case. In the one or two millenniums following the Scouring, chaos was still a very new and very unknown enemy in the galaxy. I imagine a significant minority of chapters ended up falling to chaos through temptation, corruption, or hubris, especially after their Horus Heresy veterans were killed off in battle. These chapters would've been purged and swept under the rug, the rest of the galaxy never hearing of them again. Either that or they escape into the warp and become something far different.

Page 11 of 14 FirstFirst ... 9 10 11 12 13 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •