View Poll Results: With your main army at 2,000 points or more, how often to you include a Lv. 4 mage?

Voters
228. You may not vote on this poll
  • I always include one.

    88 38.60%
  • I include one often.

    60 26.32%
  • I include one about half of the time.

    39 17.11%
  • I do not include one all that often.

    31 13.60%
  • I do not ever include one.

    10 4.39%
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 86

Thread: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

  1. #41

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Quote Originally Posted by AlphariusOmegon20 View Post
    It depends though if you're playing an army that really NEEDS one.

    Skaven most certainly do NOT need one, a level 3 will get you by.

    Sadly, the Skaven army has no option for a level 3 wizard. Well, some of the special characters, but no one ever takes them.

  2. #42
    Chapter Master Lord Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Idaho
    Posts
    6,702

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Inquisitor View Post
    Is 35 points that worthwhile?

    For 35 points, you get:
    - An extra spell
    - Much increased chance of getting the spells you want
    - +1 to cast
    - +1 to dispel

    If it were a magic item it'd be a steal. +1 to cast and dispel alone is a 70 point item!
    This.

    If you're already investing in a Lv. 3, why wouldn't you upgrade to a Lv. 4? The only argument I can think of would be if a Lv. 3 was more than enough for your army's needs, in which case you should just downgrade to a Lv. 2 and save yourself 100 points.
    The (Rat)Men of (Under)Talabheim! - A Painting Log

    Quote Originally Posted by Sgt John Keel View Post
    That's because GW believes hardcovers should cost more even when they are digital.

  3. #43
    Chapter Master AlphariusOmegon20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    2,787

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rudra34 View Post
    Sadly, the Skaven army has no option for a level 3 wizard. Well, some of the special characters, but no one ever takes them.
    Actually, Skrolk is who I was thinking of specifically.

    And I do take him on a regular basis and do just fine with him.
    "From the fires of betrayal, Unto the blood of revenge, We bring the word of Lorgar, The Bearer of the Word, The favored son of Chaos; All praise be given unto him, For those that would not heed, We offer praise to those that do, That they might turn their gaze our way, And gift us with the boon of pain, To turn the galaxy red with blood, and feed the hunger of the Gods." - Excerpt of the 341st book of the Epistles of Lorgar.

    Waaagh! Gutzag - my first 40K Plog

  4. #44

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    For empire: Level one, lore of metal, dispel scroll, ruby ring of ruin.

    For WofC : Level 2,MofT, Enchanted shield, Infernal Puppet, Lvl 2, Mof T, Spell Familiar,

    For HE: Lvl 4 Spell Familiar

  5. #45
    Veteran Sergeant Skarsnik, the Lord's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    131

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    My armies are Bretonnians, Orcs & Goblins, Ogre Kingdoms and Vampire Counts, and I always have a lvl 4 in my armies.
    "Karkahautti karhiainen, mylleröitti messän herra, kaatu maahan kuninkaana, lävistyipi leppäsille.
    Pejihaiset pijetähän, messäläistä muistetahan, Ukolleki uhratahan, poikoansa palvotahan."

  6. #46
    Chaplain Eyrenthaal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Malmö - sweden
    Posts
    196
    I voted never which isn't true but almost. Sometimes you have to shake things up a little so that your main opponents doesn't know exactly what to expect. But for me it's more about denying my opponent his magic than making use of mine.

    Then I try to kill them off in the other fases... ;-)

  7. #47
    Commander Dante blackfur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Under the Twin Cities
    Posts
    600

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    I often take one, depending on what army i take, in skaven i always do because I love the bell and its one of they're strongest aspects, (Magic, not the bell... ) but in deamons, its 1 maybe 2 lvl 2's at best, I usually run Khorne heavy with a couple Tzeentch Harold's in there for life buffs.
    The Under-city (WIP SKaven Plog)
    Lizardmen of the City of Mists (WIP lizardmen Plog)


    Miniatures bought this year 2013: 17 Miniatures Painted this year: 2

  8. #48
    Chapter Master thesheriff's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    The 7th ed. terror bubble of Tesco
    Posts
    2,914

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Sweet sweet Horrors all the way. The main attraction of a lv.4 being his raw dispel pwoer and his "level-the-field-ness", Horrors fulfil this, as well as havin over 40 wounds, a 4++, many ranks and a **** tonne of static combat res. This is also paired w/ Heralds of Tzeentch, who can take whatever lore (at loremaster) that he needs (life, death, shadow, beasts etc.)

    My wood elevs often take a Lv.4 w/ beasts for some extra bow line firepower and on the spot hero buffing. Or possibly a Treeman ancient w/ Annoyance of Netlings, but more often a lv.4

    And my lizards ALWAYS take the flying Shadow-slann of doom. -D3T + salamanders is brutal

    thesheriff
    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Inquisitor View Post
    I'm Sigmar and so's my wife!
    Quote Originally Posted by LanceSaba View Post
    as a slight bump and through much respect. thesheriff is the law around here when it come to WoC.
    ┏(-_- )┛┗( -_-)┓┗(-_-)┛┏(-_-)┓

  9. #49
    Chapter Master Lord Inquisitor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norfolk, VA, USA
    Posts
    10,001

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    I've been trying to make do for comp reasons with a Level 2 and a Level 1 (daemon prince and slaanesh herald) and man, it really hurts not having that level 4 to dispel with.
    ... and then I won.

  10. #50

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Honetly, I win more games without a L4 then I do with one. People overcommit to magic defense so much that its like having 350 dead points in your list, most of the time. The need for one largely depends on your choice of army, as I think (Daemons aside) any army with mostly T3 and a low model count needs the extra push in the magic phase, both offensively and defensively. If a lore is really good and has a solid signature, I will sometimes take just a L3. Looking at the armies I have commonly run in tournaments the last three years:

    Daemons (Tzeench Slaanesh mix)- I generally just run one Heavens herald and the L3 horror block and thats all I ever really seem to need. Having a L4 Keeper can be awesome, but it just makes losing her to cannons that much more painful. This is an army that can work just fine with L2s.

    Ogres (Ironguts and Maneaters)- I prefer the Tyrant to the SM for various reasons. I run two Firebellies and pop the Hellheart to keep the magic phase in my favor on the key turn I am doing my decisive combats (I do not bring a scroll in this list) and win a lot of games that way. In fact, I think its safe to say that I do better with my Ogres than my Daemons, in terms of win loss ratios.

    Bretts (Mixed army)- This army I bring a L4 Heavens wizard and leave her in the back to guard the peasants, but I have run her as a L3 (Did this at Throne of Skulls last year in vegas) and done just fine with her like that. Ice Shard and one other workable spell are all I really want out of her and this army can take two scrolls, so L3 gets it done. I would not likely take less than that in a competitive environment.

    Night Goblins (all NG)- Not exactly my strongest list, but again I win a lot of games with it with just a pair of L2s. Sneaky Stealing obviously makes them better offensively and the entire army is MMU, so someone sticking a spell on a medium sized unit of goblins is not exactly game breaking for me. I mean, yeah go ahead and dwellers that 30 man spearmen unit; I got four more like it waiting in the wings. Go ahead and miasma my WS2 goblins. Go ahead and Mind Razor. The army just does not care at all, by design.

    So those are my four tourney armies and the one with the lowest win percentage is actually the only one I habitually run a lord level wizard in. If you are not good at managing your magic phases, you might need to play it safe, but having a L4 is not an essential ingredient of a good list, despite what the internet masses might say.

  11. #51
    Chapter Master Lord Inquisitor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norfolk, VA, USA
    Posts
    10,001

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    I think the key feature whether you need a Level 4 is really what your other magic defences are. I find that Ogres can do without a Level 4 as a Rune Maw, Hellheart and a Dispel Scroll are enough to make a mockery of any magical attacks. Likewise Daemons don't really have a problem if they take a couple of Loremaster Tzeentch heralds with daemonic Dispel Scrolls. As I said just above, playing with a Level 2 and no dispel scrolls is just horrific and last game I just got all my heroes splatted by a barrage of death snipes I just couldn't stop. Brets likewise can take two scrolls, which are enough to keep your army going long enough to get to the enemy at least. I can't contemplate not taking a level 4 in a goblin army, it's peanuts really for a level 4. But the armies you list all have substantial access to magic defences.
    ... and then I won.

  12. #52

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    I think it comes down to a cost against benefit thing. Some armies can just eat a bad magic phase for a variety of reasons. Ogres and Daemons can just kind of tough it out and goblins are just so numerous and inexpensive that you can afford to ignore most of the magic phase. On the offensive side, having two L2s generally will use up all your dice in a given turn without making you feel like you wasted points if you get stuffed, provided the wizards serve some other purpose.

    In the case of the gobbos, one bad mushroom roll would end my phase if I had a single L4 (as opposed to two L2s) and having the second wizard lets me cram in the Frog Scroll. Not going bonkers on characters lets me put more raw bodies on the table, which in turn gives me more disposable units that can eat spells I might otherwise need to stop. Having really crappy troops helps, too, since over half the spells out there are effectively meaningless when debuffing goblin statlines.

    In the case of the Ogres, I all bring is the Hellheart for defense, because with all the extra bodies I have by not paying the butcher tax, I can beat down most enemies in the decisive turns without magic interferance. The Firebellies also serve other roles (one has a crown) in the army, so I do not really lose much if a magic phase goes south on me, especially early in the game.

    Daemons, its a little tricky since my army relies on a little push from heavens to offset certain weaknesses, but even then the Tzeench herald is also my BSB and the horrors are my lategame tarpit of doom. Defensively, it hurts a little if something rough gets through, but the army can generally hang in there and wait for the luck to switch sides.

    Bretts very much need a lord level caster and probably both scrolls. They are succeptible to nearly every kill spell in the game and need either the pressure of Comet or the defense of Flesh to Stone to get through certain situations. Even with all that in place, I still tend to lose a lot more with Bretts than my other tourney armies and its usually directly attributable to the magic phase. Magic is fickle and I prefer reliable, but sometimes you have to dance with the girl you came with.

  13. #53
    Chapter Master Lord Inquisitor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Norfolk, VA, USA
    Posts
    10,001

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    I don't know. Spells like boosted Soulblight win games and if anything the spell is more effective against armies with a lot of bodies on the field. I just can't imagine hitting the field with no level 4 and no respectable magic defence.
    ... and then I won.

  14. #54
    Chaplain Brother Haephestus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Sierra Vista, AZ
    Posts
    232

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Depends on your game theme. Are you playing 'regular' armies against your friends, or are you tournamenting and looking for every advantage?

    Against certain armies I will take one (High Elves in particular), but I'm more inclined to take a pair of 2s than I am a 4. I think if I were tournamenting I'd really press to find room for a Lord level sorc, but in friendly games I'm looking for a little more variety in my force.
    New DoC W1/L1/D0

  15. #55

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Well so far I have won one five game event with DoC, with the Horror L3 block being my best wizard and not having any scroll against a pretty strong field of opposition. I won one five game event with my Ogre list with a pair of FBs, Hellheart, and again no scroll, but that event had far less difficult competition. I just got back from QCR, which is probably the best GT in the US, and came in 4th with the Night Goblins with a pair of L2s, but had the scroll there. The year I focused on Bretts I hit four events and generally placed around 2nd to 4th overall, but no trophies to show for it outside one best general showing and that was with a L4. So, clearly it is possible.

    I think its just about threat assessment. I generally pick one spell that I think I will be able to stop and toss the pile and ignore most of the rest. The minute you play like you have to stop every spell is when they sneak the killers through or you put yourself into positions where a minor spell hoses you. I think its a common problem of players dating back to 6th edition that makes them feel like they are entitled to stuff each and every spell that is cast. A well designed army can let the small stuff through and endure it. Death Star lists with few units tend to suffer more. Your soulblight example is a good example of one possible exception, but even then I can weather one turn of that. Daemons will stick around, Ironguts will still rack up kills, Goblins with nets will tread water for a turn and ride it out with steadfast, Bretts cope with static and armor saves, and so on. Funny enough, with my MMU style of play, Comet is the spell I fear most, followed by Ice Shard and Light of Battle, since those spells can wreck most MMU armies.

    I guess it goes back to MMU being the best counter to an unbalanced magic offence. Magic is pretty fickle and there is going to be a turn where they roll bad. Static res and raw numbers are always there and can wait for that moment to tip the scales. With a Lord level wizard, you are just basically sitting there hoping that 6 dicing your kill spell will win you the game without eating your wizard in the process, which is not very tactical or reliable.

  16. #56
    Chapter Master Vipoid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Time for a game of dissappearing bears.
    Posts
    3,231

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Dan View Post
    If you're already investing in a Lv. 3, why wouldn't you upgrade to a Lv. 4? The only argument I can think of would be if a Lv. 3 was more than enough for your army's needs, in which case you should just downgrade to a Lv. 2 and save yourself 100 points.
    It's a fair point.

    At 2000pts I generally use a Lv3 Vampire Lord, because I spend a lot on defence and combat power, and don't have the points to upgrade him to a level 4.

    Although, if i was playing larger games, I admit that I'd defiantly want to try and include a Lv4 Necromancer, alongside my Vampire Lord.
    Quote Originally Posted by Maoriboy007 View Post
    Using Tomb Kings to defend anything in Warhammer is like using the Phantom Menace to defend Attack of the Clones.
    Quote Originally Posted by wyvirn View Post
    If you find that disturbing, you should see how much a comma changes a sentence.

    Let's eat, Grandpa!

  17. #57

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Only time I take a lvl 3, is Vlad.

    The fact that Vlad is only a lvl 3 is kinda bull.

  18. #58
    Chapter Master Vipoid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Time for a game of dissappearing bears.
    Posts
    3,231

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kloud13 View Post
    Only time I take a lvl 3, is Vlad.

    The fact that Vlad is only a lvl 3 is kinda bull.
    To be honest, I don't mind that Vlad is only Lv3.

    It's his 170pt 'Make Vlad Good' tax that bothers me...
    Quote Originally Posted by Maoriboy007 View Post
    Using Tomb Kings to defend anything in Warhammer is like using the Phantom Menace to defend Attack of the Clones.
    Quote Originally Posted by wyvirn View Post
    If you find that disturbing, you should see how much a comma changes a sentence.

    Let's eat, Grandpa!

  19. #59

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lord Inquisitor View Post
    I don't know. Spells like boosted Soulblight win games and if anything the spell is more effective against armies with a lot of bodies on the field. I just can't imagine hitting the field with no level 4 and no respectable magic defence.
    Agree a single hex/augment can easily win a combat and without access to multiple scrolls and magic items for defence a lvl 4 pretty dam good especially since it opens up an entire phase of the game for you. As I have posted before if you add up the amount of dispel and magic dice you get over a game a lvl4 is a down right bargain for points.

  20. #60

    Re: Do you always take a Lv. 4?

    At 2500 and above I always will with chaos dwarfs. Only lord choice is a wizard so I may as well spend the 35 pts.

    Sometimes with tomb kings. More often I wont though

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •