Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

  1. #1

    Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    Hi seers,

    I was reading the entry for T'au skyrays and noticed it comes with a target lock within the points cost, and in it rules set it says that you can potentally fire 2 missiles at 2 diffrent targets per turn

    then I read the FAQ and it says that target lock no longer exists

    does this mean the T'au now have a vehicle whereby it's big selling point in the Heavy section and the big reason everyone looked at them has now been totally made pointless,

    I mean before I used to take 2 skyrays and let off 12 missiles a turn wrecking or immobilizing most of my enemies transports turn 1 and have him walk... this now does not seem possible, and the hammerhead got hit hard to... seems the only viable Heavy's now are broadsides and snipers...

    let me know if I reading this wrong

  2. #2
    As far as I can see and from what I've read it is true target lock c's to exist.

  3. #3

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    true, thats what I thoguht, so even if I mark up 4 targets in 1 round of shooting, i can still only shoot any missile I have at 1 target, even if I have markers left over... so effectivly GW has killed the only reason anyone ever took a skyray... gee thanks...

  4. #4
    Librarian Aertes's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    373

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    Are you sure that's the same Target Lock that the one that was denied by the FAQ (page 28)?

    Could it be that the eliminated target lock was that of the armours, and the one of the vehicles still works?
    Last edited by Aertes; 04-07-2012 at 09:25.

  5. #5

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    Target locks are irrelevant to seeker missiles; they'll fire at their markerlight-designated target regardless. It does nerf the markerlights and secondary weapon system, though. It's an unnecessary, strange, and seemingly random amendment. Of all the things in the game they could've FAQ-nerfed for no reason, they chose Tau Target Locks. Bizarre.
    Quote Originally Posted by DoctorTom View Post
    this is probably the first time in the forum someone had to give a definition for "a". Congratulations.

  6. #6

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    but the codex says the skyray uses the target lock to launch 2 missiles at seprate targets and the target lock on verhicles description sadly, is the same entry for the 1 the FAQ has trashed...

    not only that but without the target lock is that the skyray can no longer fire its own markers at diffrent targets...

  7. #7
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Umeå (but still Älvsbyn), Sweden
    Posts
    1,479

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    Well, the bit about the sky ray firing at two different targets is more that it, on it's own and without support, could fire at two different targets. And still can since they didn't remove the vehicle target lock on page 30, only the non-vehicle version on page 28. A very odd and strange thing to do and I wonder why... I mean, we pay points for it.
    "Morituri Nolumus Mori - We that are about to die don't want to"
    - Rincewind

    My IG paintlog: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=198889

    My Army of Fallen paintlog: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...58#post4397158

  8. #8

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    meaning we can also still take the upgrade for broadsides, even more anti-AV in 6th, awsome...

  9. #9
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Umeå (but still Älvsbyn), Sweden
    Posts
    1,479

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    Well, suits loose their target lock since it is only described on page 28. So I can't see why broadsides would retain theirs.
    "Morituri Nolumus Mori - We that are about to die don't want to"
    - Rincewind

    My IG paintlog: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=198889

    My Army of Fallen paintlog: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...58#post4397158

  10. #10
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Akron, OH USA
    Posts
    2,719

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    Quote Originally Posted by 2nd place View Post
    I mean before I used to take 2 skyrays and let off 12 missiles a turn
    Wait, what? You let off 12 missiles a turn with your 12 single shot weapons?
    Once upon a midnight dreary...
    Quote Originally Posted by Hanska of Kompletely Kroot, May 12 2009, 12:42 PM
    May your enemies taste as sweet as your victories...
    Quote Originally Posted by paddyalexander View Post
    I agree though, gwPLC are not evil. Greedy, incompetent bullies... yes. Not evil, true evil requires intelligence and focus that they've not been demonstrating for the last 6-5 years.

  11. #11
    Librarian acme2468's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Louisville KY area
    Posts
    420

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    Given that the FAQ specified the Target Lock on page 28 while the Vehicle Target lock is another seperate entry on page 31 its pretty clear Vehicles still get theirs. I'm not sure why they Ruled the way they did, why not have it give "Split Fire" USR?



    I'm an Ork .....but I sometimes play Tau
    I Don't Just Play Orks, I Am One
    Quote Originally Posted by tkdarktrooper View Post
    Acme truly is an Ork Warboss [the bigger the badder].
    Quote Originally Posted by Da Reddaneks View Post
    ".... that guy is a real ork. I've never seen anyone that big and loud having that much fun in a game of 40k." Then a couple guys chimed in with "oh yeah, I remember that guy, yeah, he reminded me of an ork that day." etc.

  12. #12

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    @forgottenLore: no I let off 12 missiles turn 1 then use them as mobile SMS platforms

    @acme: the target lock on PAGE 28 refrences the version used by infantry, fire warrior teams, suits still get there's as this os done on page 25 also

  13. #13
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Umeå (but still Älvsbyn), Sweden
    Posts
    1,479

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    @2nd place
    The rules for target lock on page 28 is what they have removed, not the option for them (though taking them without any rules is stupid). So only our vehicles still have the target locks. Just look at how they have changed all other gear, they refer to the place where the rules are written and not where you buy them.
    "Morituri Nolumus Mori - We that are about to die don't want to"
    - Rincewind

    My IG paintlog: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=198889

    My Army of Fallen paintlog: http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...58#post4397158

  14. #14

    Re: Just need someone to confirm my reading...

    I think we should just wait until the new codex arrives, since the Tau have very little of anything effective (Except Railguns and XV8's of course).
    And besides, the Sky Ray sucked pretty bad even before they took the Target Lock away. Command and control node was also pretty good at times.. As was Disruption pod (now its only "good" vs the Manticore)
    At the moment, they seem to be a trick army that is unable to compete with the 5th codex armies well. Especially vs the Imperial Guard, because of the changes to Blast weapons vs vehicles (And the addition of flyers).
    But i have to say i admire those who can still win games with the Tau these days!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •