Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 34

Thread: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

  1. #1
    Brother Sergeant Watchmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    42

    opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    Since flyers get more important in the 6th edition (or at least some think they are), I wanted to hear some opinions on the Thunderbolt heavy fighter from Forgeworld.

    besides it is a lovely model Forgeworld created (of course!), is it usable?

    I compare it to the Vendetta:
    two twinlinked autocannons and a twinlinked lascannon plus the option of four bombs or hellstrike missiles makes it more versatile then the Vendetta Gunship I belive. the Vendetta is a pure tank hunter with three twinlinked lascannons. the autocannons and bombs make the Thunderbolt better against infantry and light vehicles.

    but AV12 of the Vendetta is better, cheaper by 50 points and has transport capacity.

    so?

  2. #2
    Chapter Master Radium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands.
    Posts
    2,886

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    The vendetta is plain better. The thunderbolt is more awesome though!
    Nemesis Doom Thumb - Castigator
    Eldar Runes of Cheating - Cheeslord

    A single candle that shows the way... RIP Brimstone.

    I'm painting some Eldar again!
    Models bought in 2013: 57; painted in 2013: 47

  3. #3

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    The forgeworld flyers were all assigned points cost under the old AA rules, which saw AA weapons cost significantly more and reduced all AA attack ranges by 12", in addition to the snapfire penalty.

    At its current points cost, no its not competitive. The increased access to quad flak and introduction of hullpoints hurt it bad.

    It's still very cool though.
    Awesome. Awesome to the head.

  4. #4
    Brother Sergeant Watchmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    42

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    maybe this will change with the release of the Imperial Armour Aeronautica end of this week? I hope so...but I think not significantly.

  5. #5
    Chapter Master Radium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands.
    Posts
    2,886

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    I'm guessing the new IA will only update the flyers to the new rules (adding vector dancer and strafing and such to some models), while only slightly adjusting the points costs.
    Nemesis Doom Thumb - Castigator
    Eldar Runes of Cheating - Cheeslord

    A single candle that shows the way... RIP Brimstone.

    I'm painting some Eldar again!
    Models bought in 2013: 57; painted in 2013: 47

  6. #6
    Chapter Master boogle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bexhill
    Posts
    7,270

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    You can make the Vendetta slightly more versatile by swapping out the Lascannons for Hellfury's but then it's not as good as the Valkyrie.

    as for the Thunderbolt - do you like the model? If so then go for it
    Elysians Blog (now with added Deathwatch): http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...25#post5042725

    New Review site, we cover GW/BL/All forms of geekery: http://www.fiftyshadesofgeek.org/, also on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/50shadesofgeek and twitter @shadesofgeek

  7. #7

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    The Thunderbolt's main advantage over the Vendetta is clarity of purpose. While it lacks the Vendetta's punch, it also doesn't need to spend time dropping into hover mode to unload passengers, and can instead focus on its anti-air role (at which it is quite good, if not quite Vendetta-level).

    That said, barring changes in IA:A, it is pretty overcosted. Scuttlebutt has it that it's getting upped to AV11, but who knows.

    I'm definitely getting one once I have the budget for it. Ignoring pure efficiency, it's a much cooler dogfighter than the Vendetta can ever hope to be.

  8. #8
    Brother Sergeant Watchmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    42

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    a good point.

    yes, I do like the model and I always wanted to have one for my Armoured battlegroup.
    i have a Vanquisher and a Deatroyer, three lascannons, which will do the tank hunter job well, I believe. so, a Thunderbolt is the better AA support.

  9. #9
    Chapter Master boogle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Bexhill
    Posts
    7,270

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    Indeed, get yourself a copt of AI when it comes out and see if it fits better with the new rules
    Elysians Blog (now with added Deathwatch): http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...25#post5042725

    New Review site, we cover GW/BL/All forms of geekery: http://www.fiftyshadesofgeek.org/, also on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/50shadesofgeek and twitter @shadesofgeek

  10. #10
    Chapter Master Shamana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Sofia, Bulgaria
    Posts
    2,734

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchmaster View Post
    I compare it to the Vendetta:?
    That's the problem, really. The Vendetta was good in 5th, and in 6th the combination of its previous rules and flier status makes it extremely powerful. Compared to it, very few things are worth its points. We will see how the AI book addresses it, but unless the Vendetta (and to a lesser amount the Valkyrie) is nerfed, pretty much anything has to be buffed to compare to it.

  11. #11
    Brother Sergeant Watchmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    42

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    ....and it is ordered! together with the IA Aeronatica. my consideration was: since I field a siege army, air transport isn´t that important, the Hades can do the job as well and you have the chance to do severe damage with it (and the engineers can move, shoot and assault normally). So adding four bombs to a template-packes army...more is better! Just ignoring the rules, it is a must have model of a fighter!

    At least I get the attention of the others if you field a flyer something not being a Vakyrie or kitbashed Vendetta. I am pretty sure it gets the supersonic special rule, hover mode isn´t a thing a heavy fighter has.
    Last edited by Watchmaster; 24-07-2012 at 21:54.

  12. #12
    Brother Sergeant Watchmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    42

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    can somebody give me the size of the Thunderbolt? (in cm or mm)
    there are no sizes on FW homepage and nothing found by google...thanks!

  13. #13

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchmaster View Post
    can somebody give me the size of the Thunderbolt? (in cm or mm)
    Wingspan 11", length 10" - going by an old thread, don't have one to hand.

  14. #14
    Brother Sergeant Watchmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    42

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    thanks. what would be important to me is the height, too, so I know how to transport it to games

  15. #15

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchmaster View Post
    thanks. what would be important to me is the height, too, so I know how to transport it to games
    With the model on a flat surface the tail was just over 8cm off the table.
    25cm long, 28cm wingspan.

  16. #16
    Chapter Master Dangersaurus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Chico, CA
    Posts
    1,253

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    The only issue with Thunderbolts is if you arm them with bombs. You'll need an Apocalyptic Barrage template to properly use them as it currently stands. Hopefully Aeronautica gives them a more '40k-approved' armament.

  17. #17
    Brother Sergeant Watchmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    42

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by A.T. View Post
    With the model on a flat surface the tail was just over 8cm off the table.
    25cm long, 28cm wingspan.
    many thanks A.T., that will help!

  18. #18
    Chapter Master Treadhead_1st's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    1,696

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    What also might be worth bearing in mind, given the theme of your army, is the new Forgeworld flyer coming out, the Avenger - it's nose cannon is absolutely brutal against other flyers, and it sports a twin-linked Lascannon, and I believe it will get hardpoints for bombs/missiles as well. I personally don't think it is as good-looking as the Thunderbolt (or the Lightning, for that matter - that is one sleek aircraft), but it could complement a couple, and your army, nicely.
    An Inquisitor walks into a bar, =][= Post removed by the authority of the Inquisition =][=

  19. #19

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    the avenger is a great design... i also liked it when it was the Naboo N1 Starfighter!

    lol

    i LOVE the thunderbolt, it looks chunky, mean and VERY IG. the hot rod bits on the nose, everything.

    i just cannot afford it- however i am holding out for a plastic one as that is a rumour that pops up once every six months. maybe more likely with the avenger being the same price point?
    after several years on this forum I have come to the conclusion it is actually the most ridiculous place on the internet.

  20. #20
    Brother Sergeant Watchmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    42

    Re: opinion on 6th edition flyers: Thunderbolt heavy fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by Treadhead_1st View Post
    What also might be worth bearing in mind, given the theme of your army, is the new Forgeworld flyer coming out, the Avenger - it's nose cannon is absolutely brutal against other flyers, and it sports a twin-linked Lascannon, and I believe it will get hardpoints for bombs/missiles as well
    FW gave the Avenger only 2 HP...I dunno why. It can be armed pretty heavily, but I think it is shot down quite fast because its hullpoints and the fact, that your enemy will really dislike the Bolt cannon. that will make it target no.1

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •