Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 22

Thread: Watchers in the Dark

  1. #1

    Watchers in the Dark

    A paragraph from Descent of Angels caught my eye:



    What do you think? Is the cabal here same as Cabal in Legion and Deliverance Lost?
    Order. Unity. Obedience.

  2. #2
    Brother Sergeant
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    leicester ,uk.
    Posts
    29

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    could be.
    although the watchers in the dark seem to all be the ame shape and size ,whereas the cabal in legion was very patchwork.
    STILL in need of spare land raider tracks.
    OR space marine bike parts
    please pm me if you're interested in offloading some.

  3. #3

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    Plus the watchers seem to be very focused on Caliban while the Cabal in Legion is a bit more big picture. They could always be a splinter group though, the Inquisition has factions with different takes on how to deal with problems, the Cabal could have had similar internal differences.

  4. #4
    Chapter Master TheDungen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    3,258

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    They could be the warp echo of the cabal i suppose?

  5. #5

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    I think it's certainly possible, if not likely. It seems a little unlikely that the Cabal has a constant meeting on the go, or that all the member races are always represented at the meetings. Sometimes Jawa Dave the Watcher can't make it and sends his apologies, other times it's someone else. As long as they can get in touch psychically, they need not ever be in the one spot even. So aye, they very well could be.

  6. #6
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    meep moop
    Posts
    1,528

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    I think people are generally putting too much weight on the name "The Cabal" for that group of Xenos in Legion, assuming that whenever the "cabal" is used in the 40K setting since it referes to that specific group*. It is just a word.

    Still, of course, it could be that group they are referring to, we'll have to wait and see. My bet is on a "no" though, the Watchers are doing their own thing, the cabal here being the conclave of other Watchers.

    *Like how an entry in the leaked release list now had people riled up over models for them when it is likely just something for a cabal of chaos cultists...

  7. #7

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    There could be a possible connection.
    It is mentioned in Legion that they tried to work with the Dark Angels before going with the Alpha Legion but they were already corrupted or something. IIRC.

  8. #8
    Chapter Master Askil the Undecided's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Shoreham, West Sussex, UK
    Posts
    1,867

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    I thought it was fairly obvious they were guarding the taint in Caliban on behaf of the Cabal.
    Quote Originally Posted by Spider-pope View Post
    Also, i think Askil should be hired by GW immediately and take over all future fluff development for 40k.
    Quote Originally Posted by blackcherry View Post
    I think this [...] goes to prove that if nothing else, Askil really should be in charge of the background for Chaos. He clearly gets just gets it.

  9. #9
    Chapter Master Chem-Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Tantonis IV
    Posts
    5,518

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    Quote Originally Posted by Askil the Undecided View Post
    I thought it was fairly obvious they were guarding the taint in Caliban on behaf of the Cabal.
    This.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scalebug View Post
    I think people are generally putting too much weight on the name "The Cabal" for that group of Xenos in Legion, assuming that whenever the "cabal" is used in the 40K setting since it referes to that specific group*.
    Ok, assume two disparate factions of Xenos are fighting "The Great Annihilator", with the kind of knowledge and ability each possess it would be nearly impossible to say these groups are not aware of each other. If they are aware of each other and are fighting towards the same end why aren't they cooperating as a single coordinated group?

    I understand where you're coming from when you're talking about applying too much meaning to the use of the word but there's also a risk of attaching too little significance. It's entirely possible for the term to have specific in-universe meaning above and beyond that of the dictionary definition of a word (especially in a setting that's so free and easy with metaphor and simile) and this is an example of it in use, the Watcher uses more than one term in the explanation of their mission all of which would have been sufficient without that word.


    Like how an entry in the leaked release list now had people riled up over models for them when it is likely just something for a cabal of chaos cultists...
    Unless these Cultists also have taken it upon themselves to use the names of established in-universe xenos species, I'm not buying this (whilst maintaining a certain level of scepticism about the "leak").

    At the risk of a tangent.... and for the sake of offering a different spin.
    Initially I was pretty incredulous that GW would give a BL plot progressing faction an "On table" presence but switch it around.

    It's possible that GW had a disparate group of lesser alien factions in the works some time ago (it's been a topic of discussion pretty much since WHFB's Dogs of War was first sighted, it would be doing them a disservice to assume none of the design team had considered it), maybe at the time Dan Abnett was writing Legion it was little more than a name, or a side project without much meat to it but it could have been there all the same. GW are pretty good at seeding the setting with hooks for use later (C'tan for example) this could represent the next evolution in that, put a faction in the middle of the Heresy and you have them solidly anchored into the setting ten thousand years ago.
    Far fetched? Maybe, but consider the 6th Edition Psychic disciplines. Exactly the same as the disciplines devised by Magnus on the governing principals of how he understood the Warp as described in Thousand Sons.

    Chicken or Egg? It could be that the BL writers' are starting to have a tangible influence on the development of the game itself, the Psychic disciplines exist because of Thousand Sons, the Cabal (if legit) are the expression of what appeared in Legion.
    Either way, it makes it interesting to look at the Heresy series again and wonder what other things are in there because they're being inserted to the setting at ground level. Knights and Robots, please for the love of the Omnissiah. Knights and Robots

    Now back to your scheduled programming....
    40K spend '09: £205.70.'10: £87.50.'11: £29.00. '12: £89.00. '13: £6.00
    Models painted in 2013: 0.5

    Brimstone. Gone but not forgotten.

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    meep moop
    Posts
    1,528

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    I'd say you are seeing patterns where there are none...

    The diciplines there, they are, apart from being rather intuitive fields, something that has been in fantasy gaming for decades... even if you are not going further than GW themselves, they are the same that were in Inquisitor (2000) and Necromunda (1995).

    Unless these Cultists also have taken it upon themselves to use the names of established in-universe xenos species, I'm not buying this (whilst maintaining a certain level of scepticism about the "leak").
    Well, that was my point - It isn't a name... A cabal is a group of conspirators (and in fantasy fiction, wizards and such). The Dark Eldar are organised in cabals (though spelled with K...), Ahrimans gang that helped him with the rubric and got exiled alongside him was a cabal of senior sorcerers, etc...


    My guess is that we are rather going to see the Cabal (capital C, and a "the" there to note the specific group...) destroyed, by either the traitors or lojalists, or something like an Eldar faction that don't agree on their plan, before we get to the end of the Heresy series. It just feels like something that would fit, dramatically, otherwise they are just these guys who's plan didn't work out, and they are still shuffling around in the shadows a bit embarresed 10.000 years later. Which would be anticlimatic.

  11. #11
    Chapter Master TheDungen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    3,258

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    except the watchers are localised to Caliban right? so if the Cabal have never been to Caliban they wouldnt know about each others existance.

  12. #12
    Chapter Master Idaan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    2,983

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    The Cabal implies that it tried to recruit a Legion to their cause and failed. If they thought XX Legion presented an opportunity, it's pretty plausible that they tried with I Legion first.
    Quote Originally Posted by Hellebore View Post
    I've wanted to do a diorama of some space marines holding a step ladder Iwojima style whilst Marneus Calgar is on the top Punching the Forgeworld avatar in the face.

  13. #13
    Chapter Master Chem-Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Tantonis IV
    Posts
    5,518

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    Quote Originally Posted by Scalebug View Post
    I'd say you are seeing patterns where there are none...
    Suggesting only. I remain sceptical, but not closed minded to the posibility that a company can plan it's fiction ahead of time.

    The diciplines there, they are, apart from being rather intuitive fields, something that has been in fantasy gaming for decades... even if you are not going further than GW themselves, they are the same that were in Inquisitor (2000) and Necromunda (1995).
    You are, of course, right. I had actually largely forgotten about the Inquisitor disciplines and, as a devout Cawdor, my experience with them extends purely to using them as fuel that, and I'd forgotten about them



    Well, that was my point - It isn't a name...
    The name I was clumsily alluding to was "Cabal Tarellian Cotor with Dragontongue". The Tarellians are an established non-playable faction (at the moment), you're suggesting that the Cabal units mentioned in the Hobbit dump could merely be a Chaos Cult thing, if this were the case (and the dump is legit) we wouldn't have them labelled as a known Xenos species.

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDungen View Post
    except the watchers are localised to Caliban right? so if the Cabal have never been to Caliban they wouldnt know about each others existance.
    The Cabal are a multi species effort, it'd be pretty likely that one of the umpteen species of the Cabal would be aware of Caliban and it's denizens, if this were true, having a similar cause would most likely generate the occasion to at least offer of resource pooling or membership of the Cabal. I also doubt the Cabal would have had much difficulty getting to Caliban prior to the Lion's ascendancy and the coming of the Emperor. Might be a little more dangerous after then but we know the Cabal have a good number of human representatives.
    Both groups are also pretty good at telepathic communication, meaning that physical presence may not be necessary to have some kind of discourse.
    40K spend '09: £205.70.'10: £87.50.'11: £29.00. '12: £89.00. '13: £6.00
    Models painted in 2013: 0.5

    Brimstone. Gone but not forgotten.

  14. #14
    Chapter Master TheDungen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    3,258

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    occam's razor chem. The explanation that requires the least amount of assumptions is the most probable one. The assumption that they simply happen to use that word against all the assumptions you just made?

  15. #15
    Chapter Master Chem-Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Tantonis IV
    Posts
    5,518

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    Which bit? I addressed three different topics.
    40K spend '09: £205.70.'10: £87.50.'11: £29.00. '12: £89.00. '13: £6.00
    Models painted in 2013: 0.5

    Brimstone. Gone but not forgotten.

  16. #16
    Chapter Master TheDungen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    The Frozen North
    Posts
    3,258

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    oh thats what i get for skimming trough it =P

  17. #17
    Brother Sergeant Atia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    67

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    Quote Originally Posted by Idaan View Post
    The Cabal implies that it tried to recruit a Legion to their cause and failed. If they thought XX Legion presented an opportunity, it's pretty plausible that they tried with I Legion first.
    This. After their fail with the alpha legion, they thried it with the dark angels.
    >> Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? <<

    Space Wolves: Logan Grimnars Great Company http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...arhound-titan)

  18. #18
    Librarian aim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Middlesbrough, England.
    Posts
    363

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    Quote Originally Posted by Atia View Post
    This. After their fail with the alpha legion, they thried it with the dark angels.
    Other way around. They imply in the book that AL is their second attempt because they're the newest legion and the most likely to not be completely propoganda brainwashed.

    I'm with Chem-Dog here. There seems to be a group of people who insist on railing against what the background is clearly trying to imply because it is not explicitly spoonfed to them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Watchers
    Hi we are part of an alien cabal that works against chaos
    Quote Originally Posted by Cabal
    Hi we are a cabal of aliens that works against chaos, the older legions are too ingrained and indoctrinated to listen to us so we came to you
    Quote Originally Posted by Random_Forum_Goer
    ITS JUST A MASSIVE COINCIDENCE, IT DOESNT SAY IN BLACK AND WHITE THAT THEY ARE THE SAME CABAL! THEY ARE TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ALIEN CABALS THAT ARE WORKING AGAINST CHAOS! STOP BEING SILLY, JUST BECAUSE THEY BOTH USE THE WORD CABAL, BOTH FIGHT CHAOS, BOTH ARE COMPRISED OF PSYCHIC ALIENS AND IT IS HEAVILY IMPLIED THAT THE CABAL IN LEGION HAS HAD CONTACT WITH OTHER MARINE LEGIONS DOES NOT MEAN THEY ARE THE SAME, YOU ARE CLUTCHING AT STRAWS!
    Um yeah, OK, I'm inclined to follow the hints as opposed to assuming that everything is a complete coincidence and that the two writers of the books accidentaly both had the same idea and used the same wording by mistake without meaning there to be any link.

  19. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    meep moop
    Posts
    1,528

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    Quote Originally Posted by Chem-Dog View Post
    The name I was clumsily alluding to was "Cabal Tarellian Cotor with Dragontongue". The Tarellians are an established non-playable faction (at the moment), you're suggesting that the Cabal units mentioned in the Hobbit dump could merely be a Chaos Cult thing, if this were the case (and the dump is legit) we wouldn't have them labelled as a known Xenos species..
    Ahh! OK, my mistake, somehow I missed that line and just saw the "Cabal Alpha Psyker" under it... which, by its lonesome sounded a lot like something fitting a cabal of chaos cultists.

  20. #20
    Chapter Master Chem-Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Tantonis IV
    Posts
    5,518

    Re: Watchers in the Dark

    Quote Originally Posted by Atia View Post
    This. After their fail with the alpha legion, they thried it with the dark angels.
    Pretty sure the Alpha Legion were approached after the Dark Angels were. Though I admit to having a little trouble with the general timeline.

    Quote Originally Posted by aim View Post
    I'm with Chem-Dog here.
    All the cool kids are
    (Cheque is in the mail.....)

    Um yeah, OK, I'm inclined to follow the hints as opposed to assuming that everything is a complete coincidence and that the two writers of the books accidentaly both had the same idea and used the same wording by mistake without meaning there to be any link.
    Given the fairly regular "High Lords of Terra" meetings the authors have, I'm inclined to believe there's a very large amount of cooperation and inter-author chat about these things.
    Which is why I suggested the Cabal as a deliberate insert as a retroactive "always been there" faction.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scalebug View Post
    Ahh! OK, my mistake, somehow I missed that line and just saw the "Cabal Alpha Psyker" under it... which, by its lonesome sounded a lot like something fitting a cabal of chaos cultists.
    Funnily enough, I went into that thread to copy the name for use in my post above, saw the Alpha Psyker and thought to myself "If it were only an Alpha Psyker listed, it'd be a good guess"

    @TheDungen
    40K spend '09: £205.70.'10: £87.50.'11: £29.00. '12: £89.00. '13: £6.00
    Models painted in 2013: 0.5

    Brimstone. Gone but not forgotten.

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •