|
| HOME FORUMS GALLERY NEWS RUMOURS SEARCH |
|
|||||||
| 40K General Discussion From the Imperium to the encroaching Tyranid swarms, this is the place to talk about everything 40K related. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Veteran Sergeant
|
Now, I know even speaking of the CSM Codex is a very sensible topic, so I want to make clear that I dont want to complain about the codex or start a flame war or a whinge fest with this thread.
Simple question: If GW continues its normal way in updating codices, when would the CSM get a new one? (I dont believe that I will ever see a legion codex but not going off topic here) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Chapter Master
|
There is no regular cycle, it depends on too many factors.
Does anybody in the studio want to do it? Does it make financial sense to do? Is there a new model range to promote? Does a new Edition make a new codex essential (applies to main codex loyalist marines only)? etc etc
__________________
In the Grim Darkness of the far future, there is only...inadequate FAQs, sloppy proofreading, and minimal playtesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Brother Sergeant
|
I know people do believe that 6 years between updates is a good practise, and it is. However there have been times when Games Workshop has updated a book much sooner then the 6 year mark. Look at when the 3rd edition Chaos Space Marine Codex was released and then look at when the 3.5 version was released. It was 3 years. I'm not saying that thats what going to happen now, I'm merely stating Games Workshop has had occasion to replace a problematic codex relatively quickly. I'm in no way saying the codex will be next year, merely its a possibility (though early 2011 is my guess)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Chapter Master
|
__________________
'Do Astartes Dream of Genetically Modified Sheep? - Both Loyalist and Traitor': http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=227853
'The Lost Legions PT.II - Legio XI': http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=230565 'The Age of Scouring - A Galaxy In Flames': http://www.warseer.com/forums/showthread.php?t=231454 |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Chapter Master
|
going by GW's track record
2E CSM book 1996 3E CSM book 1999 3.5E CSM book 2002/2003 4E CSM book 2007 I'd expect the next one in late 2011 or 2012.
__________________
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT. 57th Krieg Panzergrenadiers (Mechanized Imperial Guard Death Korps of Krieg Grenadier/ST IG army, Infantry, Tanks, The whole army) IV Astartes Legion: Iron Warriors Chaos Space Marines 7th Grand Company. (Painting Log Here Update Oct.11) 19th Tau Vior'la Pacification Force, Log (suspended)Here. 9th Haalvak Legion. Mechanized Infantry. Log (updated Oct.2) |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Chapter Master
|
Apparently it is 2010, second half of the year.
__________________
*Things I've Done For Retail Sales *40K Project Log- Dark Angels, Orks,Word Bearers, Tau, IG *Vampire Counts Project Log Airbrush Information & Advice Current 40K Armies: Dark Angels Word Bearers Orks Tallarn Imperial Guard Tau Currentl WFB Armies: Vampire Counts Bretonnians |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Chaplain
|
I'd love to be able to have fun with the around 10k points of Chaos that I have.
__________________
W/L/D with Black Templars: 1/1/2 The REAL reason my Dark Elves are so good: |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Solitaire
|
The majority of the posts in this thread were off topic and have been removed. Kindly stick to the subject at hand.
- The Moderators |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Brother Sergeant
|
Are there values that exist independently of mankind? No, subjective/objective cannot be used to win arguments anymore. My subjective perception, independent of yours, has acquired various sensory perception with which it forms a judgement upon the subject (4.0). This judgement is based upon my self-serving needs in relation to a chaos codex. These self-serving needs, unsatisfied by 4.0 in so many diverse ways (I have gone on at length about Icons) therefore lead me to a negative valuation of 4.0 as a whole. Yes, a subjective one. But tell me, can any such valuation be "objective"? If not, why then is the absent absolute seen to actually devalue the value? Ah, but then it is only my "opinion" and carries less weight. The power of the absolute in the form of "objectivity" is such that it has .... authority ..... among certain minds. And whether the OP likes 4.0 or not is no skin off my nose .... Or, GW need to stop supporting them and let them die. They've been in a sort of purgatory/limbo for years ..... Last edited by PariahX; 04-11-2009 at 08:23. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|