Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: power weapons vs. vehicles

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Librarian
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    482

    power weapons vs. vehicles

    I know AP1 weapons get a +1 on the armor penetration table

    but what about power weapons? I would think that a weapon that ignore armor saves would count at least as an "AP1" weapon but can't find anything in the book to back it up

    so a fig armed with a power weapon is no more able to harm a vehicle than a "regular" grunt?

  2. #2
    Chapter Master Tonberry's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Staines, London
    Posts
    2,239

    Re: power weapons vs. vehicles

    Quote Originally Posted by Bathawk View Post
    so a fig armed with a power weapon is no more able to harm a vehicle than a "regular" grunt?
    Correct. If you want power weapons ripping open vehicles then it's back to 2nd edition. Nowdays that's down to power fists and thunder hammers.

  3. #3
    Librarian Snotteef's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    473

    Re: power weapons vs. vehicles

    This is another case where simple rules have won out over '40k realism.' If it slices through terminator armor, it should slice through dreadnoughts and rhino hatches, but that would be hard to write simple, balanced rules for, so it can't.

    Don't expect realism or consistency from 40k. It is VERY abstract.
    "Pain? Pain is like love . . . like compassion! It is a thing only for lesser men. What is pain to Doom?"

  4. #4
    Veteran Sergeant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tucson, AZ USA
    Posts
    119

    Re: power weapons vs. vehicles

    I'm not a fluff expert but I would think that the difference is in the sheer thickness and durability of the armour plating itself. Regardless of how tough Space Marine ceremite armour may be, there's a reason why they still use a Toughness value instead of and Armour value. The power weapon may well cleave into vehicle armour just as easily as personnel armour, but the force of a persons swing without mechanical assistance can only deliver so much force, meaning it simply can't punch through in any meaningful way most of the time. Rockets, Thunderhammers, Powerklaws, melta bombs ect are made specifically to enhance the anti-vehicle capabilities of personnel. So when you look at it that way, it seems alot more logical IMO.
    "Turning in the saddle, the Nob raised his middle digit in Fast Grubba's direction before hitting the Tau line like a thunderbolt."
    - Codex Orks

    Quote Originally Posted by Klomster View Post
    Imagine an ork with a beard reaching the ground comin' at ya with his weelchair swinging a choppa.
    Awesome.

  5. #5
    Chapter Master Radium's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands.
    Posts
    3,561

    Re: power weapons vs. vehicles

    Isn't this supposed to be in the rules section, where it has been asked numerous times?

    Anyhow, all people before me have the correct answer, power weapons help squat against vehicles.
    Ave applicator paintoris!

    I paint some Horus Heresy stuff.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •