Just today the new Beastman armybook cover has been revealed and while it's not a bad piece of artwork, the general opinion (which includes my own) is that it is not quite as good as the previous editions. In the past i have heard similar things said about the Space Marine codex cover (from 4th-5th edition) and it got me wondering that if a piece of artwork is good enough should it survive a change of edition, or is the rotation a necessary process in order to mark a new edition of the rules and continue to develop the imagery. Are there any bits of artwork that you consider 'too good' to waste in the obscure depths of army books or artbooks? If so- which would you reinstate in their proper position?

Dr Death