Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 182

Thread: Early Eldar rumors

  1. #1
    Librarian Stickmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Stratton on the Fosse
    Posts
    386

    Early Eldar rumors

    Hello warseer!

    I have some very early Eldar rumors. First let me start with a very clear disclaimer:

    THESE ARE EARLY RUMORS, CODEX ELDAR IS RUMORED MID TO LATE 2013! I EXPECT MUCH OF THIS TO CHANGE OR EVOLVE FROM WHAT I AM HEARING TODAY!

    Ok, very small list, so on to what Im hearing:

    Aspects all have a way to move to troops. However, some are limited to one unit only. The phoenix Lords are NOT this mechanism supposedly.

    Guardians have a slight points reduction.

    Tanks ( night spinner, fire prism, falcon) have a point reduction.

    Transports are about the same cost.

    Storm guardians are an upgrade of normal guardians.

    Rumor those units requiring a guide (wraithguard , wraithlord) longer sit idle when out side range and rolling a 1. Instead they can make a move towards a warlock or other guide. Engaging these units in cc while they are outside their guides range will have penalties, treat as ws 1, i 1. However, guides will have "buffs" they can give. Reroll to hit, bonus save, etc. (To me this sounds suspiciously like changes to nids and the tervigon)
    <

  2. #2
    Chaplain movin_pics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    A Post Thatcher NE
    Posts
    192

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by Stickmonkey View Post
    Aspects all have a way to move to troops. However, some are limited to one unit only. The phoenix Lords are NOT this mechanism supposedly.
    sounds like this could be based on Autarch (sp?) upgrades...
    As it turns out any 8th ed army book cover can be improved by googlie eyes
    <

  3. #3
    This is way too far out to have any kind of points/rules rumors

    http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...Release-rumors

    Click here for super accurate rumors
    Last edited by The Dude; 11-05-2012 at 03:11.
    <

  4. #4
    Chapter Master Theocracity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    5,892

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Thanks for the rumors Stick! Sounds like interesting stuff.
    /////
    Tales of the Seferim Sector: an ongoing series of narrative battle reports.

    Orks of the Seferim Sector
    <

  5. #5
    Chaplain movin_pics's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    A Post Thatcher NE
    Posts
    192

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost of scubasteve View Post
    http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...Release-rumors

    Click here for super accurate rumors
    Just let the guy post his rumors, if they pan out cool.. If not.. oh well.
    Better to have new rumors to discuss than nothing at all...
    As it turns out any 8th ed army book cover can be improved by googlie eyes
    <

  6. #6
    Chapter Master TheDoctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Louisiana, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,048

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    All the rumors sound fairly logical to me. Of course, this IS GW we are talking about.

    Also, the mid to late 2013 jives with the other rumors we have been hearing about the next couple of 40k releases after 6th/chaos being tau, dark angels, and eldar.
    My painting log, Alaitoc Eldar and Dark Angels:
    http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...89#post5897489

    Quote Originally Posted by Cthell View Post
    Farseers say "make it so". Autarchs make it so
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarian View Post
    Dark Angel USR: Keep it Secret, Keep it Safe - Nobody else can read your Codex to confirm things. If they try, they are Fallen, and you are expected to act accordingly...
    <

  7. #7
    Commander megatrons2nd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Crawfordsville Indiana
    Posts
    899

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Isn't Stickmonkey usually off on dates but close if not spot on with details? Maybe I'm wrong but that is the way I remember it. Thanks Stickmonkey, these sound interesting, but I humbly request a bit of clearing up on the wraithguard/wraithlord bits. Thanks.
    Sanity is just the most common form of insanity

    All the world's a joke and the people merely punchlines
    <

  8. #8
    Chapter Master MajorWesJanson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    12,976

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Autarchs make the most sense moving Aspects to troops. Maybe depending on wargear upgrades?
    Tanks cheaper, Guardians cheaper, Storm Guardians as upgrades to guardians all make sense.
    Seers for Wraith units giving buffs makes sense, especially as that is what warlocks are for. Let warlocks be a unit upgrade, and cast the buff powers, and have farseers do the offensive powers.
    "As I've always said, Wes is wise." - Scryer in the Darkness
    "Wes, if you keep this up you'll need to change your name to MajorWiseJanson." - Azzy
    "Many boffins died to bring us this information." - Forgeworld Announcement E-mail
    "Rest assured, Servitor 13 has your best interests at heart. Now let's fire up the lascannons." - GW changes their web privacy policy.
    <

  9. #9
    Commander megatrons2nd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Crawfordsville Indiana
    Posts
    899

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by MajorWesJanson View Post
    Let warlocks be a unit upgrade, and cast the buff powers, and have farseers do the offensive powers.
    I would prefer the Farseers to mess with my opponents ability to deploy, redeploy me, hinder my opponents reserve, and actually have a means to enhance the army, not just a squad or two. Maybe even have a power for illusionary terrain to remove cover saves from opponents, or add to my army.

    Adding a battle psycher of similar prowess would be nice though.
    Sanity is just the most common form of insanity

    All the world's a joke and the people merely punchlines
    <

  10. #10
    Chapter Master AlphariusOmegon20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Chicago IL
    Posts
    2,750

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by megatrons2nd View Post
    Isn't Stickmonkey usually off on dates but close if not spot on with details? Maybe I'm wrong but that is the way I remember it. Thanks Stickmonkey, these sound interesting, but I humbly request a bit of clearing up on the wraithguard/wraithlord bits. Thanks.
    Yeah, That's the way I remember his rumors also. I remember he tends to be a bit late with his time frames, but the info is spot on.

    So I'm taking a grain of salt with it and expecting it early to mid 2013, instead of mid to late 2013.
    "From the fires of betrayal, Unto the blood of revenge, We bring the word of Lorgar, The Bearer of the Word, The favored son of Chaos; All praise be given unto him, For those that would not heed, We offer praise to those that do, That they might turn their gaze our way, And gift us with the boon of pain, To turn the galaxy red with blood, and feed the hunger of the Gods." - Excerpt of the 341st book of the Epistles of Lorgar.

    Waaagh! Gutzag - my first 40K Plog
    <

  11. #11
    Chapter Master
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    2,219

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by Stickmonkey View Post
    Guardians have a slight points reduction.
    I have long said that with an 18" range catapult a Guardian is worth around 7pts so hopefull they get a buff AND a pts reduction. Still, I would like to have seen them improved to bring their abilities in line with their current cost as any less it very cheap for an Eldar unit. I guess I would be okay with it if they are moved firmly into a support role.
    <

  12. #12

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Thanks Stick, much appreciated.
    Also heard that they have played with Wave serpents Energy Shields becoming weaker, in that they loose there negative effects against melta etc. Still these are playtesting rumors at this stage so subject to a huge variable of change.

    Cheers,
    Rom
    Last edited by Romanus; 12-05-2012 at 23:57. Reason: The Dudes warning below
    <

  13. #13
    Chapter Master The Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    10,204

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by ghost of scubasteve View Post
    This is way too far out to have any kind of points/rules rumors

    http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...Release-rumors

    Click here for super accurate rumors
    This point has now been made. It does not need to be made again in this thread.

    I don't want this to devolve into a Hater/White Knight slugfest and will shut this thread at the merest HINT that this is happening.

    Thank you all for your cooperation.

    The Dude
    The Warseer Inquisition
    The Tale of Guilders

    That's just... like... your opinion, man.

    #| ||||||||||||||||| W ||||||||||||||||| |#
    <

  14. #14
    Brother Sergeant
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    55

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Thanks for the rumours, can I ask about the inclusion of the hornet and warp hunter?
    <

  15. #15
    Chapter Master TheDoctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Louisiana, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,048

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by dæl View Post
    Thanks for the rumours, can I ask about the inclusion of the hornet and warp hunter?
    Hasn't GW stated that they aren't going to take any more things from Forgeworld and put them into codexes?
    My painting log, Alaitoc Eldar and Dark Angels:
    http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...89#post5897489

    Quote Originally Posted by Cthell View Post
    Farseers say "make it so". Autarchs make it so
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarian View Post
    Dark Angel USR: Keep it Secret, Keep it Safe - Nobody else can read your Codex to confirm things. If they try, they are Fallen, and you are expected to act accordingly...
    <

  16. #16
    Brother Sergeant
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    55

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by TheDoctor View Post
    Hasn't GW stated that they aren't going to take any more things from Forgeworld and put them into codexes?
    I figured they would at least bring the firestorm over if there's going to be fliers all over the place, although I suppose eldar would gain air supremacy with interceptors.
    <

  17. #17
    Chapter Master The Dude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Adelaide, South Australia
    Posts
    10,204

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    They'd be more likely to make up something new IMO
    The Tale of Guilders

    That's just... like... your opinion, man.

    #| ||||||||||||||||| W ||||||||||||||||| |#
    <

  18. #18
    Commander easternheretic's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    522

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Thanks Stickmonkey for the rumors!

    In regard to the warp hunter and hornet, I'm under the vague impression that there is a ruling in the new IA books that certain units are for apoc only and certain units can also be used in normal point games as well as apoc.

    Unfortunately i can't verify, as it was an off hand remark made by a friend when he was scanning through his new IA book and I haven't actually read the book myself.

    Does anyone have the new version of IA and can verify for us please? Thanks.

    Cheers
    Last edited by easternheretic; 11-05-2012 at 03:49.
    Quote Originally Posted by eldargal View Post
    Hot as Lelith's thighs, but far more accessible and considerably safer.
    Funniest/coolest line I've read on Warseer! And a pretty good description of the plogs above.
    <

  19. #19
    Chapter Master TheDoctor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Louisiana, U.S.A.
    Posts
    1,048

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    Quote Originally Posted by easternheretic View Post
    Thanks Stickmonkey for the rumors!

    In regard to the warp hunter and hornet, I'm under the vague impression that there is a ruling in the new IA books that certain units are for apoc only and certain units can also be used in normal point games as well as apoc.

    Unfortunately i can't verify, as it was an off hand remark made by a friend when he was scanning through his new IA book and I haven't actually read the book myself.

    Does anyone have the new version of IA and can verify for us please? Thanks.

    Cheers
    Without getting into the debate of whether Forgeworld is legitimate or not, most of the stuff without the Flier or Super-heavy rules have a "40k approved" stamp, which means it can be used in regular games. Stuff like super-heavies and fliers have the "Apoc only" stamp, which obviously means apoc only.
    My painting log, Alaitoc Eldar and Dark Angels:
    http://www.warseer.com/forums/showth...89#post5897489

    Quote Originally Posted by Cthell View Post
    Farseers say "make it so". Autarchs make it so
    Quote Originally Posted by Tarian View Post
    Dark Angel USR: Keep it Secret, Keep it Safe - Nobody else can read your Codex to confirm things. If they try, they are Fallen, and you are expected to act accordingly...
    <

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Östlich
    Posts
    7,054

    Re: Early Eldar rumors

    No, wrong. The Eldar flyers (Phoenix [both versions] and Nightwing) have normal 40k rules and an "official" stamp on them in IA11 - they are like DE flyers in that regard. They also have a sentence saying they might be used as real flyers in apoc games without any point increase. So they are legit already.
    <

Page 1 of 10 1 2 3 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •