No dwarves this year
No dwarves this year
Edit. Misread a post.
I suspected as much. I can't complain though...3 out of 4 isn't bad for AB updates.Originally Posted by 75hastings69
8th Edition Record W/L/D
Warriors of Chaos: 18/9/3
Dwarfs: 4/4/2Vampire Counts: 3/2/1Dark Angels: 0/4/0
Dwarves will be in the next starter, ill bet whatever!
I'll bet no
Thats a tease! haha Do you have an idea of what is?
Oh Pyrovore, you're like the Eeyore of 40K
I've seen that wink before. YOu have an idea of what's in the starter set don't you? Any hints?I'll bet no
We/Brets??????
I heard someone say that 8th edition was supposed to last alot longer than other editions. So GW is still releasing 9th next year?????
Easy there Raven...you're getting a bit frothy.
8th Edition Record W/L/D
Warriors of Chaos: 18/9/3
Dwarfs: 4/4/2Vampire Counts: 3/2/1Dark Angels: 0/4/0
The next starter is over 18 months in the future. I think people should stay patient over that topic. Holding your breath is a non-option.
Good luck with that suggestion Darnok.
What is this...PAY-ShentZ you speak of? In all seriousness I do agree with you.
8th Edition Record W/L/D
Warriors of Chaos: 18/9/3
Dwarfs: 4/4/2Vampire Counts: 3/2/1Dark Angels: 0/4/0
I've heard this from another source I trust enough to say it's true and look a fool if it's wrong. After that it's shooty anime-style; then men in skirts the following month (can't promise a book though as they didn't say and I never ask).
Tau in April/May followed by High elves is not something I would bet against, personally.
Eldar, Lizardmen, and Hobbit ought to round out the back end of the year, with expansions and waves filling in any gaps.
"As I've always said, Wes is wise." - Scryer in the Darkness
"Wes, if you keep this up you'll need to change your name to MajorWiseJanson." - Azzy
"Many boffins died to bring us this information." - Forgeworld Announcement E-mail
"Rest assured, Servitor 13 has your best interests at heart. Now let's fire up the lascannons." - GW changes their web privacy policy.
This should be indeed the schedule up to the summer.
About a month faster/earlier than that. Probably the most intense GW release period there has been, esp as more flying nonsense for circle base folk are squeezed in somewhere as well.
So is this a way of guessing to be uncovered? Can we just keep betting "I bet Wood Elves in the starter" and such to narrow it down?I'll bet no
Wood elves could actually be a good choice for a starter set army, it would increase interest in an not all too popular army and they have some nice choices for something great looking like a plastic treeman. The question would be which army to pit them against? The army would have to be 'evil', probably melee based and perhaps because wood elves are quite elite, a horde army. So perhaps orc's and goblins? Since they are sort of all those things, whilst being a popular/'safe' army to put in a starter set.
Hasting confidence on which army is in the starter set (or perhaps which army isn't) suggests to me that its already decided and the release probably isn't too far away.
I see you are contradicting yourself already.
Bretonnia vs Dark Elves would get my vote.
As a long-time Goblin player, I can reliably inform you that failure is ALWAYS an option.
Painting Log - Circle Orboros - Warpwolves FTW!
Terrain Log - Circle Orboros themed terrain for Hordes
I see the logic (range age, juxtaposition of look and tactics) but I'm not sure. For some reason I can't help but feel Empire will be in the next version. It's been a while since they were a starter game army and the core troops could benefit from the treatment Seaguard/Swordmasters got. I suppose DE could make a good 2nd force especially if GW timed it around a revamp and new book.
I`d say Dark Elves aswell.
Brets vs Lizardmen, to bring a 'classic' back?
We both read the rumour, day and night,
but you read black where I read white.
(After someone claimed he was Phill Kelly) The real Phil Kelly would know how to spell his first name correctly.
Posting Permissions
<
Darnok
